Paying the price

A yellow-gray haze stains Midwestern skies. Fueled by years of drought and record-setting heat, smoke from the annual devastation of Western wildfires mixes with that from fires spreading across Wisconsin and Minnesota’s north woods.

Tired of running on an indoor treadmill since May, a young man from Detroit joins his friends for a pick-up street basketball game. But hazardous levels of air pollution trigger another asthma attack, and he’s rushed to the nearest hospital.

A heat dome builds over Milwaukee. Despite more than 25 days exceeding 100 degrees Fahrenheit, the urgent need to replace flood-damaged infrastructure forces construction crews to work. After an entire crew falls ill with heat exhaustion, one of them dies before doctors can rehydrate her.

At the end of the season, a young farmer in Western Minnesota looks out over small, parched corn in his fields. It’s rained precious little this summer and not at all in the past several weeks. The soil—once a rich, tillable dark brown when he was a child watching his grandfather plow—is now the color of sand. He finally admits to his family that he’ll have to sell the farm, which has been in his family for four generations.

While some of these future scenes may appear unrecognizable, others already feel too familiar. However, they are all based on projections for the Midwest in 2050 included in this year’s Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). This report clearly indicates that if we fail to meet the globally accepted climate targets of no more than 1.5 or 2 degrees Celsius by century’s end, such impacts and worse are much more likely to happen.

It has become obvious to almost everyone we’re now feeling the effects of climate change. But what is less widely known is that these current climate disasters—both here in the U.S. and around the world—are already exceeding scientific projections from earlier IPCC reports.

However, there is hope in this recent IPCC report: Because a linear relationship exists between greenhouse gas emissions and climate impacts, every ton of carbon dioxide we emit produces a predictable increase in global warming. Put another way, this means that every ton of carbon we don’t emit reduces future climate change. So in a very real way, we only “fail” once we stop trying.

Right now, Congress is considering two pieces of legislation that will help. One is the bipartisan infrastructure package; the other, the budget reconciliation package. If passed, these bills will do much to address the root causes of climate change and protect Americans from its worst impacts. Together, they clean up our power supply, incentivizing the transition from fossil fuels to clean energy. They create opportunities for clean energy manufacturing jobs, which will return to Midwestern communities that were left behind. They replace increasingly vulnerable infrastructure and improve the reliability of the electricity grid.

Now imagine some alternative scenes from a future in which we passed these bills and prioritized curbing climate change. Fresh out of technical college, a young woman moves to Lansing, Michigan, for a job at a new battery manufacturing plant paying a living wage. The promise of the green economy provides a secure future for her and her family.

A grandmother living in St. Paul boards a high-speed rail train. Four and a half hours later, she’s in Chicago to meet her son and baby grandson. A farmer near Decorah, Iowa, celebrates the one-year anniversary of leasing his grazing land for wind turbines. He uses this income to improve the profitability of his family farm. Meanwhile, our power grid hums in the background, unnoticed because it lasted through previously destructive storms. Over time, global temperatures begin to stabilize as we approach zero net emissions.

We have a choice about the kind of world that we and future generations will inhabit. But achieving it requires bold investments and a rethinking of our priorities to meet our values. And it requires that our representatives in Congress consider a future beyond their next election.

Dr. James Boulter is a chemistry professor in UW-Eau Claire’s Public Health and Environmental Studies program. He received a Ph.D. in analytical chemistry with an emphasis in atmospheric sciences from the University of Colorado-Boulder.


Recommended for you