Today - Iowa Caucuses launch voting for US President

By JOHN EYSTER   Tuesday, January 3, 2012 - 4:38 a.m.

Today - Iowa Caucuses launch voting for US President.

Countdown starting today:


ONLINE COUNTDOWNS

Our US GENERAL ELECTION DAY will be on Tuesday, November 6, 2012. We will elect our US President as well as all 435 members of our US House and 1/3 (this year it is 33 on rotation and may increase with retirements) of our US Senate.

In WI, we will elect ALL 99 members of our State Assembly and at least half of the 33 members our State Senators. This year that is 16. We elected 17 in November 2010. Retirements may increase the number of Senate seats up for election.

There are RECALL elections anticipated in 2012... those dates will depend on the filing of successful RECALL PETITIONS and then the setting of the RECALL ELECTION DATES. Time will tell...

If you are interested to follow the PUBLIC OPINION POLLS related to the elections, there is the "PollingReport.com" website which compiles various polls.

Right now, they have posted the most recent (Dec. 27-30, 2011) Des Moines Register Iowa Poll for the Republican Presidential Preference with comparison to the Nov. 27-30, 2011 poll. Very significant shift in the poll among the Republican candidates.

Surfing the website, I was amazed at the wide-range of polls. Take a look!

With the Iowa Caucuses today, it is valuable to understand how they work. The REPUBLICANS and the DEMOCRATS follow VERY different processes in the caucuses. I recommend the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel’s editorial posted yesterday which has a VERY helpful chart of the Iowa caucus process, “Caucus critics miss point; retail politics really matter.”

The editorial makes a strong case for “retail politics” clarifying disagreement with the general argument that caucuses are unreliable predictor of the presidential race (especially on the Republican side). Too few people participate. Iowa is not representative of the nation.

The editorial asserts, “Today's Iowa caucuses and the coming contests in other small states provide a necessary and welcome close look at the candidates.”

Interesting perspective shared by the editorial from Democratic strategist Carter Eskew who wrote on The Washington Post's website the other day that the caucuses have three main functions: to winnow the field, to wake up complacent front-runners (recall the message sent to former President George H.W. Bush in 1988); and to serve as a catapult for candidacies (think Jimmy Carter in 1976 and Barack Obama in 2008).

The JSOnline editorial asserts, “The extensive retail politicking required to prevail both in Iowa and New Hampshire counts for something in an era of glossy television ads and hands-free campaigns in which candidates seem to want as little actual contact with voters as possible.”

And then says, “We'll go with what Craig Robinson wrote back in May on the website Iowarepublican.com: "’The proper role is not picking the candidate who will win, but instead, vetting the candidates, whittling the pack, and picking the candidate who has done the most to win the voters with his or her ideas.’"

The final conclusion of the editorial, “That's what happens in Iowa every four years - much to the chagrin of other states and the usual coastal observers who wish it weren't so.”

What do YOU wish?

Here we go...

Mr. E.

John Eyster lives in the Edgerton area. He is an adjunct professor of political science at UW-Waukesha and an advocate for democracy/civics education in Wisconsin high schools. John is a community blogger and is not a part of The Gazette staff. His opinion is not necessarily that of the The Gazette staff or management.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(10)
kiowamohican
Jan 4, 2012 at 5:12 a.m.
Suggest removal

Romney by 8 votes! HAHA
I should not laugh, because a very close friend bet on Santorum at 1137/1 back when he was polling at under 1% in Iowa! That's what you call a BRUTAL way to lose out on very big windfall!
Any thinking person who wants something other then Obama would obviously vote for ANYONE BUT ROMNEY. However; the dumb shulbs of the GOP will follow the big $$ backed train, and the utter nonsense being put out how only Romney can win. In reality he is the one with ZERO chance of beating Obama. Just another John Kerry type...An out of touch, arrogant, flip flopping, say anything, BIG $$$ Massachusetts insider. People will never learn.

Gagzette
Jan 4, 2012 at 4:22 a.m.
Suggest removal

John McCain came in 3rd in Iowa, I don't think Iowa says a thing about who will win. It's just something for the media like John Ester to write an article about because the media only has reporters and no more journelist... It's to easy for John and the rest of the media to follow in line instead of going their own path and creating a debate of who we should choose and why. Like how Ron Paul is the ONLY canidate that stands for Liberty, Peace, and Prosperity.. Why don't you here that coming from the other canidates including Obama? Oh yeah that's right because they all want another WAR... With Iran.... Gosh... If the majority of society was right and smart then why the heck don't you hold the wealth, then why don't you have your dream job, why don't you have everything you dreamed of as a kid? BECAUSE YOU'R NOT SMART, BECAUSE YOU DON"T KNOW EVERYTHING, BECAUSE YOUR SELFISH, SELF CENTERED, and only care yourself and your family. Remeber the tear of a stranger is only water so who cares if you neighbor is wrongly searched cause of the Patriot act, as long as you can sleep at night the world is A-O-K right?

NVgrf
Jan 3, 2012 at 7:14 p.m.
Suggest removal

You know what they say? "As goes Iowa, so goes Iowa."

emac
Jan 3, 2012 at 6:27 p.m.
Suggest removal

Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Michelle Bachman should team up together. They both believe if it comes out of their mouth that makes it the truth.

wislady
Jan 3, 2012 at 6:10 p.m.
Suggest removal

Failed Promises: Iowa Edition

http://youtu.be/5vmuc4Z5Oqk

wislady
Jan 3, 2012 at 6:07 p.m.
Suggest removal

@cynicaleye
Clowns on parade....Occupiers and Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz in Iowa.

cynicaleye
Jan 3, 2012 at 12:36 p.m.
Suggest removal

Clowns on parade in Iowa. Woo Hoo!

garyprimer
Jan 3, 2012 at 8:38 a.m.
Suggest removal

The only thing relevant in Iowa is how well Romney does.

Badgerlvr
Jan 3, 2012 at 8:38 a.m.
Suggest removal

According to WCLO this morning, Iowa will prove "nothing". But then again, what does WCLO know?

poobah
Jan 3, 2012 at 7:34 a.m.
Suggest removal

John, no prediction for Iowa? About the only polling that has remained stable, and a bit surprising, in Iowa is the more MODERATE nature of this years most likely Republican caucus goer as compared to nationwide Republican voters. This could bode well for Romney and is a key factor for Romney deciding rather late to invest more time and money in Iowa than originally planned. Then again, FOX News has been trying their hardest to reframe the debate in Iowa to boost the chances of Santorum. Has Rupert finally met his match in Mitt?

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT