Fixing the Jackson Street Bridge
A few critics have been vocal about the city of Janesville’s foot-dragging when it comes to rebuilding the Jackson Street Bridge. That’s understandable, given the bridge’s unsightly condition. It’s not just that concrete pillars on the railing are crumbling or missing. Heck, a lengthy section on one end of the western railing is missing so many pillars that a guardrail has been secured over the gaping hole. I got a closeup look at all this in a visit to snap a few photos on Monday. Perhaps, since the bridge is no longer in a high-traffic area now that traffic from General Motors isn’t traversing it daily, it has taken a back seat to other more pressing infrastructure plans in the city.
Some critics wonder if the bridge is even safe, particularly after the 2008 flood, but apparently it is. The bridge’s rating in an inspection required by the state this past summer, however, did find the 92-year-old bridge’s rating had dropped low enough that the city qualifies for federal replacement funding.
That’s good because the project is expected to cost about $6.7 million, and city taxpayers will only have to pay about $1.2 million of that directly. I read about all this in a front-page story by Rick West in our sister publication, the Janesville Messenger, on Sunday.
Of course, unlike those planned roundabouts at the Racine Street intersection of Interstate 90/39, don’t expect the Jackson Street Bridge project to get underway at the first sign of spring. The concrete on that bridge will have to not only survive the rest of this winter but the freeze-and-thaw cycles of next winter, as well.
When it is rebuilt, starting in 2014 and continuing into 2015, the bridge will retain the historic sand hill arch structure. It will not replicate the current design but instead look similar. The two traffic lanes in each direction will be reduced to one, however, and the sidewalks will be widened to better accommodate foot and bicycle traffic.
In its heyday, the bridge was a much-photographed icon of Janesville. Today, not so much.
Greg Peck can be reached at (608) 755-8278 or gpeck@gazettextra.com. Or follow him on Twitter or Facebook

Jan 10, 2013 at 2:39 p.m.
Suggest removal
The damaged balusters are a safety issue for pedestrians, especially children. The city wouldn't allow balusters like that on a private deck, they shouldn't be allowed on a public bridge.
Jan 10, 2013 at 11:30 a.m.
Suggest removal
The spalling of decorative concrete balusters is not an indication of the structural soundness of the bridge. It's ugly, but it isn't unsafe. What holds the bridge up is the steel frame.
.
The city did defer maintenance, with the intention of putting together an overhaul or rebuilding. There's no benefit to fixing decorative elements on a bridge that will be replaced in a few years. That WOULD be a waste of tax dollars.
.
I'm not really certain why some people were all up in arms about this. It's unfortunate that its appearance was becoming upsetting when viewed up close, but the city also had other things that were more important. Still, it's good it will be replaced, as it's beyond the typical 50-year lifetime of road bridges.
Jan 10, 2013 at 11:11 a.m.
Suggest removal
Why did it get this bad?? Oh that is right we need round about studies.
Jan 10, 2013 at 8:01 a.m.
Suggest removal
Kudos to Billy McCoy for pushing this project forward for many years.
.
Don't let the door hit you in the a** theone.
Jan 10, 2013 at 7:26 a.m.
Suggest removal
Greg does that 1.2 million include our portion of the federal share. I don't think it does.
Jan 10, 2013 at 6:57 a.m.
Suggest removal
???
Jan 10, 2013 at 6:13 a.m.
Suggest removal
Because the city has no idea how to manage it. They elect people that look pretty in the paper yet have zero management skills.
Jan 9, 2013 at 8 p.m.
Suggest removal
This is just one more episode in the deterioration of Janesburg.
Do all the studies you want...Janesville is on the downward slide.
Jan 9, 2013 at 7:01 p.m.
Suggest removal
The spindles in the railing on the Milwaukee st bridge are in far worse condition than this.
Jan 9, 2013 at 5:15 p.m.
Suggest removal
Sorry. I cannot enter it into the comments properly. There should be NOT http:// in front of it. It is just my wordpress blog. NO http:// just jacksonstreetbridge.wordpress(dot)com If you want to go to the blog, you'll have to type it in. Sorry!
Jan 9, 2013 at 5:12 p.m.
Suggest removal
UGH! This page automatically messes with the link I am posting.. Try it again - jacksonstreetbridge.wordpress.com
Jan 9, 2013 at 5:11 p.m.
Suggest removal
*sigh* sorry... try the link again: http://jacksonstreetbridge.wordpress.com...
Jan 9, 2013 at 4:59 p.m.
Suggest removal
Http://jacksonstreetbridge.wordpress.com... has the schedule and info concerning the contracted future replacement.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.