How do you promote Super Bowl specials without using “Super Bowl”?
A few weeks ago, one of our advertising sales ladies, Marci McCarten, was stumped. She wanted to encourage restaurants and groceries to promote their Super Bowl specials this weekend but couldn’t use the term “Super Bowl.”
You see, use of that term in an ad, without paying for the rights, infringes on the National Football League’s trademark. The NFL also has a trademark on the term “Super Sunday.”
Marci asked me for advice. I turned to my creative colleagues in the newsroom with an e-mail explaining Marci’s plight.
Editor Scott Angus was thinking about an idea using the number 44, because this is Super Bowl XLIV, until I reminded him that the Super Bowl logo also wouldn’t be on the ad because of the copyright law and most readers probably wouldn’t connect the number 44 to the Super Bowl.
“Super Fork, or Super Knife and Fork, maybe with football helmets on the ends of the cutlery,” reporter Frank Schultz suggested.
Or, he suggested, “Super Goal, with a football flying through the uprights and a cornucopia of prizes on the other side.”
Reporter Kayla Bunge suggested “Big Game Bites.”
I suggested these:
“Get your gridiron grub”
“Fixin’s for football” or “Fixin’s ‘n’ football”
“Pigskin party time”
A 2006 article in the Washington Post chronicled this dilemma for advertisers who don’t want to pay the NFL millions for the rights to call it the Super Bowl or use the NFL and team logos. You can “call it the Championship, the Big Kahuna and, most certainly, the Big Game.” You can read the full story by clicking here.
So what labels and terms did Marci choose?
Watch for ads in this week's Gazettes with these labels: "Big Game Bash," "Sunday Game Plan" and "Get Your Game On with Super Specials."
Greg Peck

Feb 5, 2010 at 10:36 a.m.
Suggest removal
I drove by Taasbag last night. "Super Bowl specials Sunday" on Marquees(sp?). I laughed.
I still don't get how they can have right to something. It is just the name of the game. It is a noun. How do you get rights to a noun?
People shouldn't be able to name their kids after people w/o paying money to them. Same stupid concept if you ask me!
Feb 5, 2010 at 8:26 a.m.
Suggest removal
Businesses should substitute "Toilet Bowl" for "Super Bowl". With the exception of plumbers and building supplies companies, the unusual context should make it plain enough what is being referred to.
If enough businesses did that, the NFL might consider some type of "Conditional Use" policy to avoid looking ridiculous.
Feb 5, 2010 at 7:12 a.m.
Suggest removal
Sounds rediculous as the NFL's Big Screen restriction.
Feb 5, 2010 at 12:53 a.m.
Suggest removal
kio-Very true. I remember that "SUPER BOWL" (feels good to be able to actually say it!) and they were the most boring commercials in the history of any of the "Big Games". The ones that were entertaining, when you tried to talk about them seconds afterward, you couldn't even remember the product, website, any kind of name or brand, just the funny parts of the skit. What a HUGE waste of advertising/branding dollars.
I've even had a University tell me that their colors were protected and couldn't use their two colors together within the same ad. I ignored that challenge. Colors, as far as I have been made aware, cannot be protected. That was two years ago and....whew! I think of it every time I design an ad using those particular colors, and chuckle at the thought that they think they have an exclusive on two very simple colors.
Feb 5, 2010 at 12:02 a.m.
Suggest removal
"You see, use of that term in an ad, without paying for the rights, infringes on the National Football League’s trademark. The NFL also has a trademark on the term “Super Sunday."
WOW; what a farce!
Like the NFL is not making $$$$ HAND OVER FIST now. If they had any smarts they would just publically support legalized betting on the game, and take a %age of that as well!
.
I see our governmnet has blown $50 million or so throwing a US census ad in there! REAL SMART use of tax payer $$$ there! The 1st oman that your company is on the road to bankruptcy is placing an ad in the super bowl! Remember all the dot com ads that flooded the thing in 99? I once did a study on ROI (Return On Investment) that you would have got if you held all the stocks short (making profit when the price declines) of all the companies that placed a super bowl ad that year. The return often would have blew away most any fund out there for the year! It's literally thee biggest waste of $$$ a company can possibly do.
Feb 4, 2010 at 10:29 p.m.
Suggest removal
I run into this problem year-round :O)
Feb 4, 2010 at 9:30 p.m.
Suggest removal
Marci here! Some great ideas all around, thanks! I'll put them to use next season. You all make it sound so easy.
Gilly-That's awesome! While I didn't know the teams that were going to play at the time of designing the ads, I did know they were playing in Miami. Guess it's true, sometimes you can't see the forest for the trees!
Feb 4, 2010 at 8:35 p.m.
Suggest removal
Out here in all of our casinos they call it "The Big Game."
Feb 4, 2010 at 5:16 p.m.
Suggest removal
How ‘bout “NFL Championship Game”, or is that also protected? If so, just “Football Championship”, “Pro Football Championship”, or “Saints-Colts Championship Game”? Or hit it a bit obliquely, “Superior Sunday Football Specials.”
Oh yeah, I just trademarked all these, so before you use them, send me a cheque.
Feb 4, 2010 at 4:37 p.m.
Suggest removal
"Watch the SUPER BOWL here we have specials".
Sorry Janesvillean I still think it is stupid.
Feb 4, 2010 at 3:59 p.m.
Suggest removal
frogger, you can SAY "Super Bowl" in a news story or headline. You cannot ADVERTISE using the name, e.g. the Gazette could not run a page of restaurant ads and call it "Super Bowl Sunday Specials", nor could the restaurants put anything like that in their own ads, signs, or menus.
.
The NFL has only recently (the last few years) been aggressively enforcing this, but federal trademark law is pretty crystal clear.
Feb 4, 2010 at 3:18 p.m.
Suggest removal
Is there i different way to spell Super or Bowl?
Super Duper Soup Bowl Party.
Feb 4, 2010 at 3:16 p.m.
Suggest removal
I don't understand why you cannot use the term "super Bowl".
I hear on WCLO when they talk about Green Bay Packer and they cannot say it.
Isn't there is new issue with WHO DAT. Guess you better arrest any folks with a cannot think of the term for when you mess up the English language by the way you speak.It is sorta like dialect.
Kid- Super Bowl. That is just something you use every night. Maybe you should sue THEM for the rights!
Is their any other group that uses initial NFL- they should sure them.
To big for their britches and greedy bastards is what I think.
So we cannot have a "super Bowl party" at our home?
Gazettefan- you could get sued because you have stolen ever "gazettes" paper name!
Opps ideas
We are having a SUPER Party on SUNDAY!
Feb 4, 2010 at 1:37 p.m.
Suggest removal
I heard that a recent government study reveals that the NFL is now more powerful than Canada.
Feb 4, 2010 at 1:29 p.m.
Suggest removal
Kid, exactly when does that party begin?? ;)
Feb 4, 2010 at 1:08 p.m.
Suggest removal
id stick with using super bowl, and if the nfl comes calling just tell them it was meant for a party at thekids crib:)
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.