A Taxing Problem in Milton

By JIM LYKE   Sunday, August 16, 2009 - 8:48 a.m.

One of the things I’ve always liked about Milton was its relatively low cost of living.

When my wife and I moved back here in 1992, we weren’t the only ones lured by the city’s many charms. Affordable houses were being snapped up almost as quickly as they went on the market. During one memorable week, we had set up seven weekend appointments to look at houses, but by Saturday, every single seller had already received an offer.

When we did finally get our house here, not only was it relatively inexpensive, but so were the property taxes; no small feat considering the sterling reputation that the Milton School District has.

Unfortunately, all good things must come to an end. Over the last few years, taxes have risen sharply, and they are about to again.

The first big hit came a couple of years ago, when garbage pickup was broken out of the city’s portion of the property tax and charged as a separate “fee.” (Important note to aspiring politicians – apparently the term “fee” has a less negative connotation than “tax.” You will especially need to know this if you are elected to the State Legislature or as the Governor.) This garbage fee is still itemized on the property tax bill. Even though the City of Milton portion of my property taxes did slightly lower during the first year, the net effect was a tax increase of about $80. For my 2008 property tax bill, the fee was $120.

Then last year, the city of Milton won the prize among the taxing jurisdictions with a 14.6% increase, which in my case, translated to $116 in additional taxes. The Milton School District weighed in with a reasonable increase of $17, to bring my total increase to $133.

Tomorrow (Monday, August 17), the school district is voting to increase the tax levy by 10 percent. According to an item on page 3A of today’s Janesville Gazette, this means the mill rate for district property owners will increase 74 cents per $1,000 of equalized value. In my case, coupled with a $2,500 increase in my assessment, I’m going to get stung for an extra $121 on my tax bill next year. Even if my property assessment (which my wife and I unsuccessfully questioned) hadn’t changed, I’d still be getting hit for an extra $101.

A big part of the reason that this is happening is because of the State Legislature. In the new state budget, our legislators greatly decreased state aid to local school districts, leaving the local school boards to be the bad guys when they were left holding the bag. The state revenue cap – which dictates the maximum amount that the district can take in annually – hasn’t changed, but with less state aid, the local school board is left to fill in the gap. So the plan that Governor Thompson put in place years ago to keep local property taxes from soaring has essentially been blown up. And if you think state taxes or “fees” are going down to make up the difference, well, you’ve got another think coming.

One can argue that the local school board doesn’t have to fill in the entire gap and tax to the legal maximum revenue amount allowed by the state. And it’s true, they don’t have to. But if they don’t, the state penalizes them in future years, because the state of Wisconsin calculates the new revenue cap based on the previous year’s actual revenue amount rather than the previous year’s cap. Yes, you are reading that right. Local school boards are incented by the state not to be fiscally responsible.

Some politicians, including former Rep. Debi Towns, became aware of this ridiculous provision and passed a bill to try to end the practice. Unfortunately, along the road to passage, the Towns bill got watered down and the resulting law only provides a one-year opportunity for a local school district to go back and regain their full state revenue level.

I hate to sound defeatist, but I don’t think there is a thing any of us can do about it. I have several friends on the school board who are competent and well-meaning, and I know that the last thing they want to do is stick it to the taxpayers.

As bad as Milton’s levy increase is, Edgerton just voted to jack theirs up 20%. And as fellow blogger John Eyster noted on his “We The People” site , only a few people showed up at the budget meeting to even question that. Perhaps they feel as I do, that there is probably not much that can be done except open your pocketbook.

Besides the expected $121 hit from the school budget, the Milton City Council is about to enact a storm water utility. If you’re a Milton resident, I’m sure you’ve been hearing about this. If you’ve been vacationing for a couple of months, the link in the previous sentence will fill you in.

Again, a state mandate is forcing this cost upon local taxpayers, this time thanks to the Department of Natural Resources, which considers Milton to be part of Greater Janesville. If the ordinance creating the storm water utility is approved as proposed on Tuesday, August 18, local residents will immediately start getting charged $92 a year. So between this and the increased school taxes, I’m looking at, at least, a $213 increase in my property taxes next year. And that’s before Rock County, Blackhawk Technical College and the State of Wisconsin have their day with my wallet.

Fortunately, a couple of Milton City Council members are trying to soften the blow, but even if they succeed, it will only save me $37. Though I would certainly welcome any reduction.

With one teenager preparing to enter college and another two years behind, the large increase in taxes - coupled with a decrease in student financial aid - is especially troublesome to me. It seems like a vicious circle of paying more to get less.

About a decade ago, I served on a committee that studied the space needs of the Milton School District. Our committee’s final report concluded that there were several problem areas, particularly at the Milton Middle School. Those issues were never addressed at the time, which became painfully obvious when my children had a converted janitor’s office for a classroom when they attended MMS years later.

Now, a plan is in place to build a new Milton High School and convert the current high school to a middle school. This multi-million dollar referendum hasn’t made it to the ballot yet, wisely delayed by the school board due to the current state of the economy and the uncertainty of the district’s actual future growth.

If and when it does come to a vote, it will be a difficult sell. With taxes already increasing by hundreds of dollars per year, it’s going to be hard to get voters to willingly increase them some more, regardless of the need.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(10)
Rocky
Aug 17, 2009 at 9:33 p.m.
Suggest removal

You missed something, Jim. The city stormwater utility is charging the school district about $33,000 per year (about 10% of the total levy for the city), so a good chunk of your school tax increase is really going to pay the stormwater utility increase.

JWEyster
Aug 17, 2009 at 8:47 p.m.
Suggest removal

I appreciated YOUR blog, "A Taxing Problem in Milton" as I stated in my comment earlier... NOW, Jim, I am wondering whether I did NOT recognize you at the ANNUAL MEETING of our SD-Milton... we had a LARGER attendance than last year (about 4 times more people) with a SOLID DISCUSSION (healthy discussion with civility!)... There were 42 valid ballots with the result: 22 YES and 20 NO. NOW the Board itself makes the FINAL decision at the end of October. I commend the Milton Board for emphasizing this year that this is ONLY AN ADVISORY VOTE. I believe we need to revise WI state law so that an ADJOURNED ANNUAL MEETING of the school district would let WE THE PEOPLE (voters & taxpayers) actually SET the property tax levy when ALL THE DATA is complete late in October. WHY NOT? What's your perspective, Jim? Yes, I'll be reading your blog posting with special interest.

Here we go... John

Ealing
Aug 17, 2009 at 7:09 p.m.
Suggest removal

Not sure you real point Jim. Are you complaining? What about all those people you laid off at your company. At least you have a job to pay the increases. They don't!

sannio
Aug 17, 2009 at 3:02 p.m.
Suggest removal

So, are you angry yet?
What are you going to do about it?
Vote Democrat? Vote Republican?
Is there a difference?
http://www.lp.org/issues

Timing
Aug 17, 2009 at 12:01 p.m.
Suggest removal

Jim, sobering, but very well done. I have always toyed with the idea of a "resident tax". A tax for all adults to pay regardless of whether or not you decided to buy a home or not. This tax would apply to everyone over the age of 18 who was not a full time student (prorated for part time students), and was reduced significantly upon retirement age (65 or so). This would eliminate the property tax on your primary residence only. I feel and will always feel that others and myself who chose to invest the majority of our incomes on a home are taxed simply for that reason. Someone who owns a $250,000 house does not use any more or less of the services provided from property tax than one who owns a $125,000 house. I know life is not fair, but there is no reason everyone who lives in a certain political subdivision should not be obligated to pay the same amount to enjoy the fruits of that community. Sorry if I strayed off topic, but I felt it was related. Good work Jim!

janesvillecomments
Aug 17, 2009 at 1:53 a.m.
Suggest removal

Mr. Lyke, I suggest you start campaigning now for Milton residents to consider a Monolithic Dome structure when the time comes to build a new school building. It has the advantages of being cheaper to build than a conventional school building, uses half the energy to heat and cool as conventional stuctures, is tornado-proof (several smaller communities have invested in them for their ability to do double duty as a community disaster shelter), and even earthquake-proof.
http://www.monolithic.com/topics/schools...

JWEyster
Aug 16, 2009 at 5:05 p.m.
Suggest removal

KUDOS to JIM for focusing his blog re. SD-Milton school tax INCREASE on the core/basics! Easy to understand!

The bad news bottom-line is that there is NO REASON WHATSOEVER for anyone to attend the SD-Milton ANNUAL MEETING or any other local school district ANNUAL MEETING in WI because it is a "CHARADE." The ANNUAL MEETING does NOT have authority to do anything! The reality is that the SCHOOL BOARD will actually set the Property Tax Levy in October when the "rest of the story" - all the numbers are available. That will be the ACTUAL PROPERTY TAX LEVY! So, YES, Jim, OPEN YOUR WALLET and PAY UP!

I continue to be MUCH concerned that IF our SD-Milton Board does NOT put PAY FREEZE on the table in NEGOTIATIONS with MEA (teachers' union) it will be NEGLIGENT in its duty to serve both K-12 students and property tax payers. In the midst of this ECONOMIC DEPRESSION our elected representatives on the Board need to do MORE than spend OUR money!

WE THE PEOPLE will have ability to speak with reality when the APRIL 2010 school board election comes. That's really the ONLY point of accountability for our SD-Milton Board... or any other local school board.

Take heart, REMEMBER: The Board for the Blackhawk Technical College and ALL OF OTHER technical college district boards are NOT elected. Their action to INCREASE PROPERTY TAX LEVY is totally and completely exempt from ANY input by WE THE PEOPLE - voters and taxpayers! That's why technical college districts have the HIGHEST PROPERTY TAX INCREASES year-after-year-after-year. This is, as I see it, "TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION!" Blackhawk Technical College Board rubber-stamped the administration's proposed budget with EXORBITANT PAY INCREASES for the administrators and other employees. There is NO FREEZE on compensations in the Blackhawk Technical College District!

Here we go, Jim! Be sure your wallet is FAT! Keep up the good work!

John

metromilton
Aug 16, 2009 at 2:15 p.m.
Suggest removal

If the amount was $400 it has to Evill...they give out a 10%-30% tax hike EVERY year to thier taxpayers.....

cardtrader
Aug 16, 2009 at 10:16 a.m.
Suggest removal

gallon76 you make a comment but then you don't say where you live?????

gallon76
Aug 16, 2009 at 10:06 a.m.
Suggest removal

Don't feel bad about your taxes going up in Milton. What they went up is nothing compared to what mine went up last year. Mine went up $400.00, so quit your wining.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT