ADVERTISEMENT

Wisconsin company to appeal losing $15M contract

By ASSOCIATED PRESS   Friday, February 15, 2013 - 7:34 a.m.
ADVERTISEMENT

MADISON -- The Wisconsin company that lost out on a $15 million contract to run a student information system in the state's schools planned to file an appeal Friday, arguing that the process was flawed and should be reopened.

Skyward Inc., of Stevens Point, launched a very public and high-profile campaign after the state announced on Feb. 1 that the contract was going to Infinite Campus of Blaine, Minn. Skyward ran full-page advertisements in newspapers across the state Sunday and Tuesday saying it will have to leave the state if it doesn't get the contract.

The ad listed the 220 Wisconsin school districts that Skyward already serves and urged people to contact Gov. Scott Walker and the state Department of Public Instruction.

Also this week, three Democrats and one Republican in the state Legislature introduced a bill that would allow for more than one company to provide the service to schools, meaning Skyward could continue to operate in Wisconsin.

The new data tracking system is designed to make it easier for DPI to track information and for districts to collect and share information about students, including academic performance and demographic information.




reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(17)
wislady
Feb 16, 2013 at 2:56 p.m.
Suggest removal

Here is the link to the summary of scores, which was in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.

http://media.jsonline.com/documents/Copy...

HighRoad
Feb 15, 2013 at 5:12 p.m.
Suggest removal

Skyward employs 2700 people in Stevens Point. Skyward will bluff that they are leaving Wisconsin and Walker will cave at the prospect of losing 2700 more jobs and give them what they want.

UrbanAchiever
Feb 15, 2013 at 4:40 p.m.
Suggest removal

The main reason Skyward lost is that it was outscored by Infinite Campus on a majority of evaluated areas (something like 29 of 32 areas if I recall from a report my administrator read). Janesville has two systems (Oasys and Skyward) that track student behavior and academic records. These systems do not speak to each other. One common system that can do both will make things easier among schools and transferring students. Plus, the cost for a district paying for one system instead of two should be lower.

janesvillean
Feb 15, 2013 at 2:45 p.m.
Suggest removal

"If Skyward is such a great company, each district should be able to use what ever data portal they want."
.
That's the point. They have been doing this, but the state is now requiring a standardized system. All the existing Skyward contracts in Wisconsin will be terminated and handed over to the state's chosen contractor, the Minnesota-based company.
.
DPI appears to be out of the loop on the decision process, which seems to have involved in equal measure the Department of Administration, the Wisconsin Economic Development Corporation, and the Governor's office directly (which interfered in the bid process by changing the deadline, claiming to be concerned about the process used by *its own* WEDC). The DPI only set the criteria that were used and purportedly applied fairly.

wislady
Feb 15, 2013 at 2:35 p.m.
Suggest removal

Skyward also had the inferior product.

JoyM
Feb 15, 2013 at 11:45 a.m.
Suggest removal

Who is the person responsible for awarding the job? Is it DPI or Scott Walker? Because I really don't think those two are on the same page - don't blame Walker for this if he didn't make the decision.

BuzzMcPhearson
Feb 15, 2013 at 11:19 a.m.
Suggest removal

Not mentioned in the article is that Skyward had the lowest bid.

old_badger
Feb 15, 2013 at 11 a.m.
Suggest removal

Why do we need one State system? Oh, so we can track student performance with teacher performance so we know which teachers are the bad ones. Boy the GOP are smart.

woody
Feb 15, 2013 at 10:53 a.m.
Suggest removal

Did Infinite Campus donate to the Walker campaign?

wislady
Feb 15, 2013 at 10:30 a.m.
Suggest removal

Skyward was given tax incentives in 2004 and 2010' maybe they are just used to getting the job, without proving they can provide the best service.

Is Skyward claiming they can provide a better service? The data used in comparison was posted in the Milw Journal,.

wonders
Feb 15, 2013 at 9:43 a.m.
Suggest removal

916WI Do you have solid information or are you just guessing?

old_badger
Feb 15, 2013 at 9:07 a.m.
Suggest removal

Capitalism at work.

Ezoner
Feb 15, 2013 at 9:03 a.m.
Suggest removal

Its a competitive bid process. The media and how pople feel -- does not factor in. If you lose -- you dont get a redo.

916WI
Feb 15, 2013 at 8:59 a.m.
Suggest removal

Offering Skyward a $12 million tax break is throwing them under the bus?? Huh?? Was the relocation of Infinite Campus to Wisconsin part of the contract deal they negotiated?

my_3_kids
Feb 15, 2013 at 8:32 a.m.
Suggest removal

Our district has been using "Infinite Campus" for at least 5 years, and we have had no problems with it.. If Skyward is such a great company, each district should be able to use what ever data portal they want.. I just hope they will wait until next summer ( 2014) to change because my child has one more year left in school .. I am used to this system

BuzzMcPhearson
Feb 15, 2013 at 8:31 a.m.
Suggest removal

Walker's administration was willing to offer Skyward a 12 million dollar tax break if they got the bid, so I have to wonder what kind of deal Infinite Campus is getting. Does this have anything to do with the "border war"? Is Walker willing to throw a Wisconsin business under the bus just to get a Minn. business to move to Wisconsin? Walker's WEDC board has been a failure since the day he started it.

916WI
Feb 15, 2013 at 8:18 a.m.
Suggest removal

I would hope that this contract is reopened and reconsidered. It makes no sense to have the state outsource services that can be done more efficiently and cost effectively in state.....

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT