Department: Only Congress can recognize Wis. tribe
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Department of the Interior says it cannot acknowledge the Brothertown Indian Nation of Wisconsin as an Indian tribe under federal law because Congress once terminated its tribal status.
Brothertown is based in Fond du Lac, Wis. The tribe has been seeking federal recognition since 1980 when it had 3,137 members.
A reservation for the tribe was established in 1832. But the department’s research shows that in 1839, the tribe divided its land among members with permission from Congress and gave up tribal status to do so.
The Interior Department says in its Friday decision that its rules forbid it from recognizing tribes Congress has terminated. And the department says only Congress can restore Brothertown’s tribal status. The recognition would restore the tribe’s government-to-government relationship with the U.S. government.


Sep 10, 2012 at 11:58 a.m.
Suggest removal
actually mteg, the signs up north still have the word "reservation" in the Greeting and Departure signs. Drive by them frequently. May not be the case for all tribes. Seems reservation would sound better as in land reserved for them versus mission as in a place to send aid to.
Sep 10, 2012 at 10:20 a.m.
Suggest removal
Actually, they don't refer to them as reservations anymore...they call them missions.
Sep 9, 2012 at 9:28 p.m.
Suggest removal
Thank you, janesvillean.
Sep 9, 2012 at 6:34 p.m.
Suggest removal
Rmoney gives recognition and says: "corporations are people too".
Sep 9, 2012 at 5:30 a.m.
Suggest removal
JANESVILLEAN - Good research on Brothertown Indians & that is the same info I would recommend others to read and understand. They really do not deserve the negative comments from those that do not know the historical facts. More historical info below...
"Brothertown History"
http://www.mpm.edu/wirp/icw-157.html
Sep 8, 2012 at 9:15 p.m.
Suggest removal
Anyone been to Lac du Flambeau lately? Have you seen the wonderful new clinics, schools, etc. being built? I was pretty impressed with what the tribe was doing with profits from the casino until I discovered it was all being built with the Federal Stimulus money. Oh ... the one tribe was upset about the wolf hunt so the DNR gave them half the permits in the northern part of the state (not just on reservation land). Have not seen any more complaints written about from them. Guess the firewater and guns of 1939 were the stimulus and wolf permits of today. Guess we need the President to stay home and do a reservation by reservation apology tour instead of spending the time early in his term doing a world wide apology tour for all the bad things the United States has done. That is if he isn't too busy asking the Russian ambassador to get Putin to back off on complaining about the European missle defense plans until after the election so that he can more freely negoitiate with Putin. Seems Chamberlain did that with Germany before World War II. That did not work out so well either.
Sep 8, 2012 at 8:50 p.m.
Suggest removal
Fedup wrote..."Maybe Obama can just wave his hand and reinstate them. He seems to like to make his own rules as he moves along."
Did he learn from Scooter Walker ?...or vice - versa?
Sep 8, 2012 at 11:34 a.m.
Suggest removal
The Brothertown Indians were not originally from Wisconsin. They had voluntarily moved here -- most were Christian -- but faced objections from existing Wisconsin tribes and continued pressure from white settlers, who lobbied the federal government to "remove" Indians (at gunpoint) farther and farther West, even if they had just arrived. The Brothertown (the name indicated their desire to live as a Christian brotherhood) gave up sovereignty believing it was the only way to keep their land here in Wisconsin, i.e. as individual property-owners. Dual citizenship for Native Americans was not to come until 1924, so it was an either/or choice.
http://www.mpm.edu/wirp/icw-157.html
.
The idea that all Indians were rooked out of their land because they were ignorant, dumb, greedy, or drunk is, to be polite, itself showing limited understanding of the topic. Often the Indians were facing stark choices as people and made pragmatic and difficult decisions to give up lands and rights because they held very little power and the United States had shown few compunctions about killing Indians who did not submit. See also: The Black Hawk war of 1832. In other words, just as the Brothertown arrived in Wisconsin, they saw a tribe that had taken new lands itself across the Mississippi and found it could not survive in the different conditions there destroyed and defeated because they sought to remain on their old lands -- lands sought by white settlers.
Sep 8, 2012 at 10:47 a.m.
Suggest removal
I know this about native Americans; We took full advantage of them to grow our great nation.
In the year 1839 not a lot of native Americans understood the ramifications of giving up their status when the white man was offering firewater and thunder sticks.
Sep 8, 2012 at 10 a.m.
Suggest removal
Or I should say-yes,Please enlighten us on what anyone know's about being Native American.
Sep 8, 2012 at 9:58 a.m.
Suggest removal
Please enlighten us Gary.
Sep 8, 2012 at 9:38 a.m.
Suggest removal
What do some of you know about being a Native American?
Sep 8, 2012 at 8:52 a.m.
Suggest removal
RAF Maybe you can as you think you know it all. The congress as we know them, will not recognize anyone that does not have millions. Maybe we should not recognize the GOP congress as they have divided themselves from our Country by REFUSING to work together with OUR PRESIDENT and have said so themselves.
Sep 7, 2012 at 10:35 p.m.
Suggest removal
Perhaps the dem running for the US Senate in Mass will recognize them. After all she has claimed to be an Indian her whole life but refuses to meet with, or submit proof to, the tribe she says she is from.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.