ADVERTISEMENT

City, developer at odds

By JIM LEUTE ( Contact )   Friday, September 18, 2009 - 5:58 a.m.
ADVERTISEMENT

The latest installment in a feud between the city and property owner Jim Grafft includes fresh concerns over the Monterey Hotel and a raft of code violations at a Grafft-owned building on the city’s south side.

The city on Wednesday sent Grafft an “order to correct” four violations at the vacant hotel in downtown Janesville that’s considered a key property in downtown redevelopment efforts.

The city says the violations target broken windows, piles of building materials and other trash and a leaking roof that already has caused one ceiling to collapse in the six-story building.

Grafft said he’s become a favorite target for city officials and that he’s spent hundreds of thousands of dollars over the years battling the city.

For a full story, read Friday's Janesville Gazette, read online in the Gazette’s E-Edition or check back at GazetteXtra.com.




reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(26)
janesvillean
Sep 18, 2009 at 6:22 p.m.
Suggest removal

TheJoker, two years ago Grafft talked up his plan to convert it into luxury condos with a rooftop garden and perhaps a pool overlooking the Jeffris site, which would be an L-shaped parking lot. No surprise that financing has been an issue in this housing market, but that's not an excuse for the condition of the property.

usaret
Sep 18, 2009 at 2:26 p.m.
Suggest removal

He makes a deal he can't afford or complete and then complains about being a target and then pretty soon, the city is stuck to finish in some way or other, that which he started.

wow1234
Sep 18, 2009 at 1:52 p.m.
Suggest removal

I wonder what training Stan Milam has in building safety that he is an expert on what should be required of a property owner. I wonder what would happen if someone got hurt in one of Graffts buildings-then who would be at fault?? I bet Stan would be the first one to say that the fire inspector should have done something about it.

His show is nothing more that a radio sound off show where facts don't need to be confimed. Ridiculous!

gazettefan
Sep 18, 2009 at 11:27 a.m.
Suggest removal

The photo of the rubble in back of the Monterrey and the theater was taken just a few feet from the back of an apartment building. Children live in that building.

gazettefan
Sep 18, 2009 at 10:38 a.m.
Suggest removal

Also, once city employees become aware of dangerous properties, the city instantly becomes liable for the harm to people that could come from the dangerous conditions.

This is true of Grafft's Monterrey and was true of B'moon's shack.

gazettefan
Sep 18, 2009 at 10:27 a.m.
Suggest removal

True, spikesmom.

City employees don't have the time to police every property in town. However they must respond to complaints about blighted properties and when blighted properties are clearly visible to everyone -especially city employees, themselves. This is the situation with the Monterrey as it was the case with B'moon's shack.

TheJoker
Sep 18, 2009 at 10:11 a.m.
Suggest removal

Does he have a plan for the Monterey Hotel? It seems like he started to work on it and then stopped.

janesvillean
Sep 18, 2009 at 9:57 a.m.
Suggest removal

bobb1951, the city council discussed quite a bit last year how code enforcement was going to be stepped up and they eventually budgeted for two inspectors (one part year full time, the other full year part time, I think) to do proactive inspections. Grafft is not being singled out as this property has been under scrutiny for some time and there's really no excuse for leaving it in the condition he has. An order to correct is simply that, a letter saying that they have documented a violation and it needs correction.

spikesmom
Sep 18, 2009 at 9:56 a.m.
Suggest removal

I think if this man actually cared about the city of Janesville, what that building used to mean to Janesville and what it could do to revitalize downtown, and Janesville, he would actually be putting in some serious time renovating it and less time whining about the city. If you took all that money you have spent fighting the city and put it into the building, it might be done now.

localmatters
Sep 18, 2009 at 9:23 a.m.
Suggest removal

thanks Gatr.

gazettefan
Sep 18, 2009 at 9:14 a.m.
Suggest removal

Never mind.

I don't believe the city targets people. Grafft, like B'moon, are the sources of their problems.

gazettefan
Sep 18, 2009 at 9:11 a.m.
Suggest removal

Why is this story so hard to find now?

gatr
Sep 18, 2009 at 9:02 a.m.
Suggest removal

Local matters, he also owns the oldetowne mall with partners, fairview mall, the Nunn Busch shoe factory in Edgerton and other properties

e

beeferer
Sep 18, 2009 at 8:54 a.m.
Suggest removal

It's too bad. A six story buildings downtown could have a lot of potential.

tiredofhearingit
Sep 18, 2009 at 8:53 a.m.
Suggest removal

localmatters; How about the strip mall across from Jvl mall on Milton Ave, Cargill Bldg, Fairview Mall, old Jvl Med Center (Mke St), old Sentry Store (W Court), old HUFCOR bldg (Jackson st).... just to name a few.

jeremy1123
Sep 18, 2009 at 8:37 a.m.
Suggest removal

Why not just spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to repair the building instead of battling the city?Its a to bad that that building is so dilapidated because that could be a key building in downtown development.Its to bad he just sits on that building.Guessing that its too much of an undertaking for him to repair and doesn't want to admit defeat to the city.

gazettefan
Sep 18, 2009 at 8:32 a.m.
Suggest removal

Briargrafft

localmatters
Sep 18, 2009 at 7:51 a.m.
Suggest removal

No bash, just a question for more knowledge -- What has Mr. Grafft developed? I know he's mothballed the Monterey, partially knocked down the old theater and the city dozed the old jail. What has been rehabbed and developed into a sustainable and viable building?

BBB
Sep 18, 2009 at 6:41 a.m.
Suggest removal

Go Jimmie.

localboysince1968
Sep 18, 2009 at 6:41 a.m.
Suggest removal

If you have ever owned some property/building by somebody who "thought" they knew what they were doing, you are glad for codes. I have seen some nasty, cheap, shoddy work in my lifetime. Jim should have saved his hundred of thousands he used battling the city, or given it to charity and just went along with the program. My only question is; what about the old Marling property at the corner of Beloit and Delavan drive? That place looks like a education facility for code violations....

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT