Man accused of beating Wis. mayor pleads insanity
MILWAUKEE (AP) — The man accused of attacking Milwaukee's mayor will undergo a mental-health evaluation after his lawyer entered an insanity plea on his behalf Monday to four charges, including first-degree reckless injury.
Anthony J. Peters, 20, of Milwaukee is accused of attacking Mayor Tom Barrett on Aug. 15 after the mayor intervened in a domestic dispute.
Defense attorney Anthony Cotton entered pleas of not guilty and not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect. There are multiple pleas because a trial could be split into two parts — first determining whether Peters is guilty and then whether he is capable of bearing responsibility.
Cotton said Peters has struggled with bipolar disorder and perhaps even schizophrenia.
"There's certainly a long history of mental-health issues," Cotton said.
Judge David Hansher ordered a doctor to evaluate Peters and file a report with the court by Oct. 5.
The criminal complaint against Peters said he was tussling with the grandmother of his 1-year-old daughter when Barrett tried to intervene and call 911. Peters responded by attacking Barrett with a metal object, leaving the mayor with head, mouth and hand injuries, prosecutors said.
Peters is charged with felony counts of first-degree reckless injury and theft and misdemeanor counts of disorderly conduct and bail jumping.
The charges carry a maximum sentence of 36 years behind bars and a $136,000 fine. Peters appeared in court in an orange prison jumpsuit, his hands shackled at his waist. He did not speak.
Barrett had two teeth knocked out in the attack and needed staples to close a gash on the back of his head. He has undergone several surgeries, and the 55-year-old mayor has said he worries he may never regain the full use of the middle finger on his battered right hand.
The mayor's younger brother, Milwaukee County clerk of circuit court John Barrett, sat quietly during the arraignment. Afterward he said he was optimistic about his brother's recovery, and added that a member of Peters' family had apologized to him during the hearing.
"I'm grateful they felt the need to do so," John Barrett said.
Cotton said Peters' mental-health concerns were not receiving adequate attention in jail.
"He hasn't received his medications and he hasn't seen a doctor," Cotton said. "We've made repeated requests to the jail."
The Milwaukee County sheriff's office, which runs the jail, did not immediately return a message seeking comment Monday. Prosecutor Mark Sanders said he was aware of Cotton's concerns and said "anybody in custody ought to have access to health care."
Barrett was elected Milwaukee mayor in 2004 and re-elected last year with nearly 80 percent of the vote. He also served in the U.S. House of Representatives from 1992 to 2002.

Sep 14, 2009 at 11:32 p.m.
Suggest removal
ah yes, thank God for the Ammendments! Actually, I do, but I sure wish so many criminals didn't get a smoother ride than their victims. I don't know anything about the Mayor, but I would like to say that going to the aid of a victim, regardless of personal/political gain is admirable and someone I would want in my corner! I'm very glad he is beginning the healing process, but the thought of living with permanent damage and the assailant claiming insanity is preposterous...although I agree with janesvillean. Less than 1% of all insanity pleas are found to have merit.
Sep 14, 2009 at 9:07 p.m.
Suggest removal
truth1, reckless driving is not intent to kill or maim and will never be punished as such. English common law has recognized intent as a factor in justice for something like 1000 years.
.
If someone tries to run someone down, then they are using their vehicle as a weapon. If someone just hits someone with their vehicle, they are not using it as a weapon and will not be punished as if they were. It has nothing to do with how much the vehicle weighs.
Sep 14, 2009 at 7:58 p.m.
Suggest removal
dub- A tree is not capable of going 60mph.
Sep 14, 2009 at 7:07 p.m.
Suggest removal
I beg to differ..A vehicle IS a weapon.
Try telling families of those killed by them that they're not.
Sep 14, 2009 at 3:37 p.m.
Suggest removal
He was mad at his girlfriend and beat up the first person to try to stop him.. That is the actions of a normal attitude case that deserves jail.. Hope he get's screwed.
Sep 14, 2009 at 3:35 p.m.
Suggest removal
An insanity defense is much more of an uphill battle than popular opinion assumes. He will need to be evaluated by psychiatric experts representing both the defense and prosecution, and the question will not be whether he is mentally ill in a medical sense, but whether he knew what he was doing was wrong and was capable of controlling his actions. Even then, the outcome could be civil commitment.
Sep 14, 2009 at 3:02 p.m.
Suggest removal
Wow, I bet nobody saw this coming.
Sep 14, 2009 at 1:33 p.m.
Suggest removal
Funny how that works...attack someone with a two pound weapon(if that) and be facing those penalties....KILL someone with a 3000 pound weapon and get far less than that.
Sep 14, 2009 at 12:39 p.m.
Suggest removal
Boy, it would be tough for someone in politics to no longer have use of their middle finger.
Sep 14, 2009 at 12:01 p.m.
Suggest removal
Of course he's going to use the insanity defense. What else does his lawyer have?
Sep 14, 2009 at 11:37 a.m.
Suggest removal
you attacked a man with a metal object. OF COURSE you are expletive crazy sir. that doesnt mean you didnt know what you were doing.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.