ADVERTISEMENT

Favre: 'We did what we had to do'

By ASSOCIATED PRESS   Monday, October 5, 2009 - 11:18 p.m.
ADVERTISEMENT

MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — Brett Favre proved to the Green Bay Packers he has plenty of fire left inside, and in his right arm.

Favre’s first game against his former team was all fun for the Minnesota Vikings and all frustration for the Packers, as the graying quarterback connected for three touchdown passes and 271 yards in a 30-23 victory on Monday night.

Favre went 24 for 31, without a turnover. He did an awkward body bump with kicker Ryan Longwell, also a former Packer, and stayed poised in the pocket all night.

“Lot of fun. It was a big win for us,” Favre said. “We did what we had to do.”

The Vikings (4-0) sacked Favre’s replacement, Aaron Rodgers, eight times. Jared Allen was credited with 4½ of them, a career high, including a safety in the fourth quarter that stretched the lead to 16. Rodgers had his first two turnovers of the season, and Favre turned both of them into vintage touchdown passes in the first half.

Favre hugged Rodgers, Donald Driver and several other Packers once the game was over. Rodgers tried to engineer the kind of drive his predecessor is famous for, but he came up short.

Favre also had plenty of time to throw throughout the game.

Rodgers had the exact opposite experience. He finished 26 for 37 for a career-high 384 yards, many of them in desperation down the stretch, and two touchdown passes.

The Vikings were relentless in their rush, particularly Allen on left tackle Darryn Colledge, who left in the third quarter with a right knee injury. Colledge moved from left guard two weeks ago when Chad Clifton got hurt.

Rodgers’s receivers let him down, too, though. On fourth-and-goal at the 1 in the third quarter, Rodgers found tight end Donald Lee open in the end zone. But the ball bounced off Lee’s chest and onto the turf, as Rodgers snapped his head back with his hands on the sides of his helmet.

Pink wristbands, cleats and sideline caps for breast cancer awareness gave the game a different look, but nothing altered the color scheme as much as Favre in purple. This was his sixth game with Minnesota, counting the preseason, but the sight of the guy who led Green Bay to a Super Bowl trophy and took only one losing record in 16 years there wearing the rival team’s jersey was still strange.

This was a highly anticipated and heavily hyped game. Everybody in the stadium stood all the way through the Vikings’ first possession, instead of sitting after the first few snaps like usual. Cameras flashed constantly.

Favre was clearly uncomfortable this week with all the attention on this reunion, trying to downplay the significance and stumbling through denials that his main motivation to unretire last year was revenge on general manager Ted Thompson for not letting him come back and compete for his old job with Rodgers.

“My statement has been what I’ve done over my career,” Favre said. “One game does not define my career good or bad. I know what I’ve done. I’m proud of what I’ve done. I know I can play. I wanted to do what it takes to win.”

One of the most excitable players football has ever seen, Favre’s history in emotional games has been mixed. In 2003, on Monday night against Oakland after the death of his father, Favre threw for 399 yards and four touchdowns. In 1999, though, he went 14 for 35 with four interceptions in his first game against Mike Holmgren after the head coach took over in Seattle.

The Packers (2-2) stuffed Adrian Peterson with their new 3-4 defense, holding him to 55 yards on 25 attempts and even turning one short gain directly into points. Rookie Clay Matthews joined a gang tackle and ripped the ball out, returning it 42 yards to tie the score at 14.

Favre trotted right out and took the Vikings down the field, though. He fired a 43-yard pass to Percy Harvin to give the Vikings first-and-goal at the 3, then caught a break when Charles Woodson’s interception in the end zone was wiped out by a pass interference penalty. Replays showed Woodson making minimal, if any, contact with Sidney Rice, but Peterson plunged in for a touchdown on the next play to make it 21-14.

Then came an eight-play, 80-yard drive that stretched the lead to 14. Favre found Bernard Berrian wide open from 31 yards for the score, but the setup was more impressive. Favre had six or seven seconds to throw, and found backup tight end Jeff Dugan for a 25-yarder.




reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(61)
Katy
Oct 10, 2009 at 5:25 p.m.
Suggest removal

AndrewJackson: Since when is knowledge about Professional Football a prerequisite for having an opinion about the Packers-Vikings game? This is what I do know: I hated football until we moved to Wisconsin at about the same time Green Bay acquired Brett Favre. My husband grew up a Packer Fan and I was forced to watch the games. I was soon a Packer Backer and along the way learned to tell a first down from a field goal.

All these years I thought I, too, was a Packer Fan. But when Brett Favre was forced out of GB, I realized that I was, in fact, a Brett Favre fan and always had been. Two weeks ago, I had more fun watching five minutes of Viking game highlights on SportsCenter than the entire Packer game all afternoon. Yesterday, my husband brought home a Favre Vikings jersey for me and I was overcome with joy. GO BRETT!

As for the Monday night showdown, it was really fun to watch him in action again. He is sometimes poetry in motion, sometimes a gunslinger, sometimes an interception producer but always, ALWAYS he is entertaining.

AndrewJackson
Oct 9, 2009 at 11:56 a.m.
Suggest removal

SarahB1, are you here to instigate or are you here to comment on the source article?

AndrewJackson
Oct 8, 2009 at 9:56 a.m.
Suggest removal

SarahB1, I said absolutely nothing to you. Unless you are one of the bandwagon types I was refering to. In that case, I stand by what I said.

AndrewJackson
Oct 7, 2009 at 11:20 a.m.
Suggest removal

curtaincall. YOU shouldn't post until you can prove me wrong. If you can read and comprehend that won't be until IF and WHEN the arrogant, conceited turncoat plays in a playoff game. That, my uninformed friend, is a long way down the road. Match NFL wits with ANY of you bandwagon types any time of any day! Your legs must be killing you from jumping on the Jets wagon, then down, then up on the Vikings and more than likely down soon.

JohnDoe
Oct 6, 2009 at 11:35 p.m.
Suggest removal

2nd place is the same as LAST PLACE to the winner.

JohnDoe
Oct 6, 2009 at 11:34 p.m.
Suggest removal

When the dust settles...the only thing that matters is...who won on February 7, 2010?

Arodge12
Oct 6, 2009 at 2:41 p.m.
Suggest removal

I grew up watching #4 play and just like most people just loved him, I still love watching him play. The guy is an arrogant prick though. Those who think TT "pushed" him out of town are crazy. The guy talked about retiring for a couple years before the first "real" retirement, they had a new starting QB, then he wanted back and they said he'd have to compete and thats when favre blew a gasket. Last nights game was a bit crazy with the penalties (or lack there of) on the queens, but really the packers cost themselves with continuing to drop passes just as they have all year and not being able to score in the redzone. Yeah rodgers could have thrown some balls away, but give the guy credit after being roughed up after the first 5 sacks or so he still hung in there and made plays.

pharm
Oct 6, 2009 at 1:08 p.m.
Suggest removal

87, as long as the receiver has control of the ball, it can hit the ground. It was not a blown call.

chainsawchuckie
Oct 6, 2009 at 12:01 p.m.
Suggest removal

Job Well Done!!!!

garyprimer
Oct 6, 2009 at 11:33 a.m.
Suggest removal

The Vikings have a new quarterback and he's pretty good.

cookiedough
Oct 6, 2009 at 10:47 a.m.
Suggest removal

Agree with all you said MrScott. I can't wait to see in a few weeks from now the vikes at lambeau. If Rodgers can learn how to throw the ball away instead of taking sacks all night long and Kampman and the rest of the D-line can put a pass rush on #4 along with the offensive line protecting rodgers more, I do believe the Pack has a very good chance to win at lambeau. But, all 3 must be better for them to beat the vikes.

Kleej
Oct 6, 2009 at 10:40 a.m.
Suggest removal

"curtaincall"... Right on!

mabusejuvenalis
Oct 6, 2009 at 10:31 a.m.
Suggest removal

Rogers was good - on paper and during the doesn’t count any more down-time. But it is game spirit, gaminess (eg, eluding at least some sacks) and the ability to play above your team when they do poorly that separate Favre and Rogers.
*
Also I do not understand the anti Favre and "traitor" rhetoric some use against him. It was HE being rejected by THEM - not vice versa.
*
And as for being indecisive, the battering he took at the ends of seasons recent would lead anyone to hesitate, at least in part in modesty, till the new-year love of the game kicks back in.
*
GB was small potatoes in the ways they treated both Mike Sherman and Brett Favre. The boys in the office all want to be Lombardis and they have no clue of the underlying humanity, intelligence, courage, and dedication that really made the man great. They not only lack the modesty to make an analysis, they’re not even Steinbrenner Light.
*
Until wisdom comes to the top, and humanity, I have surrendered my half-century Packer faith. It’s now Favre or, as a loyal midwester, even the Bears!

vandilynn
Oct 6, 2009 at 10:24 a.m.
Suggest removal

Isn't it strange how much time favre had to throw the ball, wow! I could had eaten a sandwich in the time that Favre recieved to throw the ball. I still say shame on the whole packer team for leaving their guy on his own. Nice tribute to Favre, but Rodgers is the packer QB, not Favre. Would had been nice to have someone protect our QB, so he could had had a chance to show his talent too. If Rodgers would had had the team work the vikings gave to their QB, we may had had a different outcome. Come on Pack, Get into the program.

curtaincall
Oct 6, 2009 at 10:22 a.m.
Suggest removal

andrewjackson, you might want to try not posting then, take your own advice.

Kleej
Oct 6, 2009 at 10:19 a.m.
Suggest removal

916WI , The only ill will that comes of this is the ignorance of the fans! On both sides of the ball!

Kleej
Oct 6, 2009 at 10:17 a.m.
Suggest removal

How about them Packers?!

I love them Vikings! (twice a year, that is!)

AndrewJackson
Oct 6, 2009 at 10:06 a.m.
Suggest removal

Can't wait to see how Brent what's his name will throw away the ball and a game in the playoffs! People that know very little about professional football should comment very little. Yes, it shows people!

87
Oct 6, 2009 at 9:57 a.m.
Suggest removal

JozeMozes, you blame the Packers loss on the refs? Also you say the interception in the endzone should have been good? Remember the Packers were also offsides on that play so it wouldn't have counted anyway. The only missed call was the tipped ball that the Packers got the first down on, it hit the ground but the Vikings did not challenge it. I think it was a great game, Favre played great, the Packers stopped 28, J.Allen played great. I am a Vikings fan and have always been a Favre fan even when he was with the Pack.

curtaincall
Oct 6, 2009 at 9:54 a.m.
Suggest removal

The press did seem to forget there was another quarterback in the game.

AlwaysaMom
Oct 6, 2009 at 9:52 a.m.
Suggest removal

One of the reason's I stopped watching the Packers was I was tired of the Farve Show. It's not all about one player. When he left I was back. Last night it started again. Rodgers did a wonderful job, as all the Packers did. Shame on the press for making all about Farve.

curtaincall
Oct 6, 2009 at 9:31 a.m.
Suggest removal

what the heck did thompson do in the office season? Pick out that pink tie?

curtaincall
Oct 6, 2009 at 9:30 a.m.
Suggest removal

Tomtom sorry nobody in the NFC North is going to the Super Bowl.

MrScott
Oct 6, 2009 at 9:15 a.m.
Suggest removal

spark, no matter how good or bad the offensive line, a QB has to make decisions which can have a significant impact on the game. Rodgers was sacked I believe 8 times, on at least 3 or 4 of those sacks he could have thrown the ball away instead of losing significant yards on a sack. As a QB, he can't hold on to the ball so long as to try and find an open receiver when there aren't any. Most NFL QBs are taught that you do NOT hold onto the ball for more than 3 seconds, and many of the sacks came after those 3 seconds...that mistake is on the QB. Fumble, safety - he needs to know where he his and make smarter decisions with the ball and not just hold onto it, period.

carlitosway
Oct 6, 2009 at 9:05 a.m.
Suggest removal

The Better QB won the game and the statistics show at this time who is the better one and are sure not in rodgers favor read em and weep. I am a packers fan and I will always be a Favre fan as I watched him play from day one and have seen many other QBs play but none have the records the MAN has and set more last night. What can you say but they outplayed the pack and I hope the Pack can get it together and play like they know they can.

vandilynn
Oct 6, 2009 at 8:57 a.m.
Suggest removal

OMG, It was as though to me anyway, that the Packer's whole team were definitly on Farve sticking it to the management. Sorry, but no one protected our QB,Rodgers, and the poor guy was out there on his own, without alot of support if any. All I seen was players missing opportunity on purpose, and then giving the whoops!!!!!!!!!! oh darn, I should had caught that ball and made that play. It was total in time !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

tomtom
Oct 6, 2009 at 8:52 a.m.
Suggest removal

Sorry. I meant I am amazed! Must correct myself before some "do good" does.

I will cheer for Brett at the Super Bowl.
the Packers won't be there with the defense we have and lack of a offensive line!!

tomtom
Oct 6, 2009 at 8:46 a.m.
Suggest removal

I am amazing. What has happened to all the Favre bashers????
I am a Packer fan, but will always be a Brett Favre fan. He had a great game.
Thompson should be fired for not spending some money and recruiting some "players". The offensive line is a "joke." How much more can Rodgers take??? Getting sacked 6-8 times a game! He has been playing well. No protection!

spark
Oct 6, 2009 at 8:43 a.m.
Suggest removal

And if don't think having time to throw the football as a quarterback makes a difference, you need to educate yourself on the game of football. The Vikings clearly beat the Packers and it was all about protecting the most important man, the quarterback.

spark
Oct 6, 2009 at 8:41 a.m.
Suggest removal

Lost_city - It was an exaggeration, try not reading into things so much. You get the point. It's all about the offensive line. That game proved it.

curtaincall
Oct 6, 2009 at 8:33 a.m.
Suggest removal

I hope Ted Thompson feels like a complete fool, because its clear Brett still ' has it.'

curtaincall
Oct 6, 2009 at 8:31 a.m.
Suggest removal

HE never had minutes. Fix your watch. But yes the Vikings did play better.

Lost_city
Oct 6, 2009 at 8:25 a.m.
Suggest removal

Really? He had minutes to throw the ball, he had time, but not minutes. Let's not make this out to be more than what it was. The Vikings just played better overall.

curtaincall
Oct 6, 2009 at 8:25 a.m.
Suggest removal

I think Rodgers is the better quarterback, no doubt. Favre just had a better night, if Aaron was not having to run for his life all night, and could stand there for minutes at a time we would have kicked their butts. But that's not what happened, but I think when they come to Greenbay we will return the favor.

spark
Oct 6, 2009 at 7:53 a.m.
Suggest removal

Those of you saying it was Favre playing better than Rodgers show how little you know about football. They are both great quarterbacks and both are beyond capable. It has everything to do with an offensive line and if you can't see that watching a game, you're getting up too much for a bathroom break. The Packers offensive line is absolutely horrible. Favre has practically minutes to throw the ball, Rodgers has seconds.

916WI
Oct 6, 2009 at 6:51 a.m.
Suggest removal

Favre is an incredible player on so many different levels. Even after all of these years it's quite clear that he just loves to play the game. Hopefully he keeps up his winning ways with his new team! It really was cool to see that no ill will exists between Brett and his former teammates as well......

BikerJoe
Oct 6, 2009 at 6:31 a.m.
Suggest removal

The Packers are an embarrassment to football, I see my Sons Middle School team play with more heart and enthusiasm..

curtaincall
Oct 6, 2009 at 5:54 a.m.
Suggest removal

Brett played a great game . Aaron is still the better quarterback. Maybe if he was not running for his life all night, and had the time like Brett did we would be 4-0. Give credit to the Vikings they came to play, we came to see if Brett would really wear purple. I loved seeing him and Donald Driver hugging and laughing after the game.

miltonalum
Oct 6, 2009 at 5:49 a.m.
Suggest removal

rodgers ia a better QB than brett right now, the packers just dont have any offensive line whatsoever. look at the time Favre had to throw the ball. The QB for janesvilles gladiators could have put up those stats with that much time to throw.

JozeMozes
Oct 6, 2009 at 1:51 a.m.
Suggest removal

Sigh, where will all the Favre fans be when he proves once again he is the king of choke come 4th quarter if the Vikes can get into the playoffs. Some of you sound exactly like those lousy ESPN analysts. Only football you have watched all year eh?
-
You call Minnesota on all the face masks and give Woodson his pick back before halftime and we got a different ballgame I am afraid. Anyone else feel like the that horrible defensive pass interference against Woodson was the proverbial sail being deflated?
-
Good teams find ways to win. Period. The Packers outside of the offensive line played a great game today and the better team prevailed.
-
I miss the old days where you didn't have referee's micro managing football. Sure more people were hurt, that was football. Starr, Cecil, Butkus, Lott, Bradshaw and the Iron Curtain! Bring it back!

carlitosway
Oct 6, 2009 at 1:08 a.m.
Suggest removal

YES BRETT was a class act and he had humility in the end and true packer fans know how he feels as he stated after the great game. TEDDY eat your heart out. Rodgers did well also he was just out played by one of the greatest QBs to ever play the game and the records he has set shows what he really is The Best QB and he deserves that title.

MrScott
Oct 6, 2009 at 1:01 a.m.
Suggest removal

And by the way, what good are those extra 100 passing yards when you're going to fumble the ball away, throw and INT, or get stuffed on 4th down on the 3 yard line?

MrScott
Oct 6, 2009 at 12:59 a.m.
Suggest removal

I'm looking at the stats. Favre passer rating 135.3; Rodgers rating 110.6. Favre TD - 3; Rodgers TD - 2. Favre INT - 0; Rodgers INT - 1. The ONLY statistic Rodger led in was passing yards 384-271, with most of those extra yards coming during a few "big" plays and junk time yards when the Vikings weren't playing their normal defense near the end of the game.

JohnDoe
Oct 6, 2009 at 12:37 a.m.
Suggest removal

Brett would have been out for the year if he had to fend for himself behind what the Packers call an offensive line.

Just listening to Rodgers after the game shows what a class act he is.

MovedOutFromUnderTheRock
Oct 6, 2009 at 12:29 a.m.
Suggest removal

Sore loser Rex. Brett played better ball than Aaron did, just face it the packers pick the wrong one to keep. Go Brett Go.

MrScott
Oct 6, 2009 at 12:23 a.m.
Suggest removal

Oh rexy, I figured a bitter Packers fan would come ruin the fun. Get a good night sleep and you'll feel better in the morning.

rexkramer
Oct 6, 2009 at 12:12 a.m.
Suggest removal

"Brett Favre is a class act, simply the best! Only wish I could shake his hand and tell him congrats!"

No, he's still a narcissistic, attention starved diva with no regard for anyone but himself. That said, he had immaculate pass protection tonight and made all the throws he had to make, when he had to make them and his receivers actually hung on to the ball. It also helped that the Packers' offensive line still can't get out of their own way. Perhaps this should serve as a wake up call to Ted "I'm a genius, just ask me" Thompson that trying to build an offensive line out of duct tape and bailing wire doesn't work, you actually have to draft and/or sign quality players. I thought Rodgers did as well as could be expected considering he was wearing Jared Allen for most of the night.

Spunkmeyer
Oct 5, 2009 at 11:37 p.m.
Suggest removal

WOOOOOOOOOOO! He's STILL the man! And Jared Allen is becoming one of my faves to watch. :)

dragonfly
Oct 5, 2009 at 11:25 p.m.
Suggest removal

Brett Favre is a class act, simply the best! Only wish I could shake his hand and tell him congrats!

MrScott
Oct 5, 2009 at 11:22 p.m.
Suggest removal

Beautiful! Jared Allen roping the cattle all night, Favre passing all over the Packers D, and Rodgers running around like a scared little girl. What happened to Favre trying to force passes? Rodgers was the one trying to make something out of nothing. He could have thrown away half the balls on plays he got sacked but chose to run around trying to force a play. It's too bad for the Packers that they took one of the best defensive ends in the NFL(Kampman)and put him at linebacker where he did nothing! Can't wait for the showdown at Lambeau! Go Vikes!

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT