Regional wind-energy proposal gets mixed reaction
MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — A proposal for a high-voltage power line that would transmit wind energy from sparsely populated areas of the gusty Midwest to some less-windy parts of the country is getting mixed reaction in Minnesota.
ITC Holdings of Novi, Mich., wants to build a 3,000-mile, 765-kilovolt power line that would stretch from the Dakotas through Minnesota to Chicago. The line, estimated to cost $10 billion to $12 billion, would help the Midwest feed the nation's appetite for renewable energy. The project has been dubbed "The Green Power Express."
But while wind power is seen by some as a jobs-producing, renewable source of energy, transmission lines have drawn opposition from local landowners, environmentalists and even some renewable-energy advocates.
Minnesota is No. 4 when it comes to wind-producing states. The state has ambitious goals for producing renewable energy — but some say it won't be able to meet those goals unless there are more and bigger transmission lines.
Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., said she hasn't made up her mind on the project yet, but she sees exporting wind power as a way to boost economic development, and she doesn't want the Green Power Express to pass through Minnesota without carrying some state-produced wind energy.
"We want to be part of the action," she said.
Most renewable energy advocates say poor transmission is stifling plans to bring resources to the mainstream. But others say the push for high-voltage lines is expensive and unnecessary.
The support for big projects like the Green Power Express will override state regulations that call for the least-cost alternatives, say critics including David Morris, vice president of the Institute for Local Self-Reliance, a Minneapolis think tank that supports wind power but not high-voltage transmission projects.
"I would call it a 'runaway express train' rather than the Green Power Express," he said, adding that individual states have enough renewable resources to create their own clean energy. Through conservation and the use of "smart grids" that are smaller and more efficient, the nation could avoid building many high-voltage transmission lines, he said.
While the debate over the Green Power Express is just beginning, another transmission project in the works might indicate what lies ahead.
In southeastern Minnesota, landowners and residents organized to oppose a transmission project called CapX 2020 that would crisscross the state with three 345-kilovolt lines. CapX 2020 is backed by 11 regional utilities and is expected to cost $1.4 billion to $1.7 billion. The state Public Utilities Commission is expected to make a decision on the project in the next few months.
The Citizens Energy Task Force was created to fight CapX 2020, and also opposes the Green Power Express.
CapX officials, who come from local utilities concerned only with strengthening Minnesota's grid, don't consider the ITC project a competitor. The ITC lines are too powerful to make it easy to deliver power within the state, according to CapX co-director Terry Grove.
"It's strictly for export," he said.
But Doug Collins, executive director of ITC Midwest, a subsidiary of ITC Holdings that's managing the project, said the project could serve "load centers" such as the Twin Cities and Madison, Wis.
"We need robust systems, and as the amounts of power needed for further growth increased, the need increased to transport them further away to load centers," Collins said.
The American Wind Energy Association, a Washington, D.C.-based trade group, agrees.
"We have almost 300,000 megawatts of wind projects on paper in the interconnection queues, and they won't move forward until more transmission is built," said Rob Gramlich, the energy association's policy director.
National Wind of Minneapolis is endorsing the ITC project. Jack Levi, co-chairman of National Wind, believes construction of the Green Power Express could give the company a road to market.
"The more lines planned, the more projects get built," he said.

Mar 9, 2009 at 4:45 p.m.
Suggest removal
Spain is building the largest solar power plant in the US... they've been working/supporting on the tech. for years in thier country
Mar 9, 2009 at 4:44 p.m.
Suggest removal
of course only one MFG is US based, foregin governments have been supporting their industry. THEY/VOTERS knew oil would decline and price would rise and polution would pollute... the same is true for Solar Power.
Mar 9, 2009 at 1:35 p.m.
Suggest removal
Actually dogs_rule, much of the technology that made it possible to develop energy from the wind was begun here in the States back in the late '70's due to rising energy costs. When our energy prices came down, European companies acquired our technology since their energy prices remained high. Now, 30 years later, we are buying back a much improved product based on the technology we developed. I guess instead of offering subsidies to fossil fuel based energy providers to reduce our cost of energy we would have been further ahead giving the subsidies to solar and wind energy producers. Maybe we'll get it right this time.
Mar 9, 2009 at 12:54 p.m.
Suggest removal
CapX for Minnesota's grid? HUH, look at their big picture, starting in the "coal fields of North Dakota" (their words, in 2005 Technical Report) into mid WI to tie in at Columbia or W. Middleton. Green Power Express? It's the commercial application of the Joint Coordinated System Plan, which is indeed export eastward, as is CapX, GPE and JCSP just take it further. Thankfully, New York ISO and ISO-New England know better, that they've got their own renewable development going on, that there may be better ways than long distance transmission, and they recognize that there's a lot of new coal inherent in the JCSP plan and so withdrew their support. For more info, search for any of these terms at www.legalectric.org Illinois has over 7.000MW of wind in queue, so, as with New York and New England, it's just not needed, they have their own. This is for marketing coal , and we don't need it or want it. NoCapX 2020!! www.nocapx2020.info
Mar 9, 2009 at 12:51 p.m.
Suggest removal
Just heard this morning, out of the top ten manufacturers of wind turbines and all of there components, only one is in the USA!
Mar 9, 2009 at 12:14 p.m.
Suggest removal
The 3000 mi figure represents a network, not just a single line.
http://www.thegreenpowerexpress.com/conc...
.
Ultimately "green power" will be generated locally, as transmission results in a loss of as much as 40% of power generated. At least with wind power this doesn't represent 40% of pollution.
Mar 9, 2009 at 11:21 a.m.
Suggest removal
A 3000 mile line from the Dakotas would travel much farther than Chicago.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.