ADVERTISEMENT

Wisconsin touts new economic development programs

By ASSOCIATED PRESS   Friday, July 10, 2009 - 5:08 p.m.
ADVERTISEMENT

By SCOTT BAUER

Associated Press Writer

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Wisconsin came up empty in the competition to land a new General Motors Corp. car plant, but tax breaks that were a part of the state’s pitch may end up helping other businesses stay or expand.

“Coming in second or third on this GM plant may turn out to be a long-run blessing,” said Tom Still, president of the Wisconsin Technology Council, which advises the governor and Legislature on economic development and other issues.

GM closed its production plant in Janesville in April, cutting about 1,200 jobs. The state lobbied the auto giant to reopen the plant to make a new line of small cars, but GM chose a Michigan plant instead.

Janesville residents who hoped the plant would reopen might find it hard to believe that losing might really be a win. But the incentives designed for the automaker may end up luring other, more attractive businesses to Wisconsin, Still said.

New tax breaks, some of which were included in the state’s $195 million pitch to GM, were passed by the Legislature this year despite a $6.6 billion budget shortfall.

Republicans have criticized the Democratic-controlled Legislature as bad for business because it balanced the state budget in part with $3 billion in higher taxes and fees. But Democratic Gov. Jim Doyle’s administration says it has overhauled the state’s economic development incentives to make Wisconsin a leader in keeping and retaining jobs.

The new tax breaks, which emphasize investment and research and development, give Wisconsin “one of the most powerful economic development tools in the country,” said Zach Brandon, executive secretary of the state Commerce Department.

There was news Thursday of a success story. Small Minneapolis biotech startup VitalMedix Inc. announced it was moving to Wisconsin thanks to the state’s network of angel investors — those individuals who provide startup money for businesses in return for partial ownership.

“They just seem to understand the deal better,” the company’s president, Jeffrey Williams, said of Wisconsin’s economic development officials and investors.

Brandon said the news was an example of how successful Wisconsin’s programs are.

But praise for the new economic development tools is getting lost among a sea of criticism from Wisconsin’s business community over higher taxes included in the state budget, in particular a doubling of taxes on capital gains.

“On balance, our thought is that there’s a lot more bad things for economic development or things that will negatively impact economic development,” said Jeff Schoepke, director of tax and corporate policy for Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce. The group has about 4,000 members representing large and small Wisconsin businesses.

WMC has criticized the budget even though it includes many of the group’s suggestions for economic development. Those included consolidating economic development programs, offering new incentives to encourage existing companies to expand, and making up to $10 million in capital gains invested in Wisconsin companies tax exempt.

The state’s efforts at economic development are getting more attention as the recession continues.

Statewide unemployment was 8.7 percent in May. In communities like Janesville and Beloit, which were hard hit by GM’s closure of its factory, unemployment is in double digits.

Other major employers also have cut jobs and closed factories.

Earlier this month, Briggs & Stratton announced it would eliminate 430 jobs and close a Jefferson plant that makes pressure washers and portable generators by mid-2010. Harley-Davidson Inc. announced in January it would cut about 650 jobs in Wisconsin.

The recession led to a record-high $6.6 billion budget shortfall and criticism from Republicans that Doyle and Democratic legislative leaders weren’t doing enough to spur more growth.

Republicans even formed their own task force that held hearings across the state to gather feedback from businesses upset with the Democratic budget. The business community has been particularly critical of the Legislature for lowering the tax exemption for capital gains from 60 percent to 30 percent. Schoepke, with WMC, said it will “have a pretty serious negative impact on Wisconsin’s economy.”

But the Commerce Department’s Brandon said the budget shields businesses with the $10 million capital gains exemption, which he called “unheard of.”




reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(12)
wesgonsin
Jul 12, 2009 at 7:46 p.m.
Suggest removal

I can see Duvall there, too. Thanx for pointing that out.

garyprimer
Jul 12, 2009 at 5:42 p.m.
Suggest removal

I see a lot of Robert Duvall there.

wesgonsin
Jul 12, 2009 at 5:12 a.m.
Suggest removal

"her mother looks an awful lot like James Brown".... That's just so funny, but depressingly true. On kind of that same note, has anyone noticed the resemblance between Rock County Circuit Court Judge Michael R. Fitzpatrick, and Frank Cady? The guy that starred in the role of Sam Drucker on 'Green Acres', the shopkeeper at the Hooterville General Store? I'll provide a link back to one of the Gazette's articles with a picture of Fitzpatrick http://gazettextra.com/news/2008/sep/21/... and another to a Green Acres fan sight featuring a picture of Frank Cady (a.k.a. Sam Drucker) http://www.maggiore.net/greenacres/gacas...

garyprimer
Jul 11, 2009 at 10:19 a.m.
Suggest removal

What? And I suppose no one ever said anything bad about Nancy Reagan or Hillary Clinton? I think that everyone was scared of Barbara Bush. Poor Laura, everyone was so busy with George that no one had time to notice her.

garyprimer
Jul 11, 2009 at 10:12 a.m.
Suggest removal

Michelle is featured in some of the ugliest clothes that I have ever seen a First Lady wear and her mother looks an awful lot like James Brown.
"Living in America - eye to eye, station to station
Living in America - hand to hand, across the nation
Living in America - got to have a celebration"

janesvillean
Jul 11, 2009 at 10:05 a.m.
Suggest removal

Whatever, wesgonsin. It is a widely used service and they are legitimate links, and you can even preview to see exactly where they go. I use it so that the longer URLs will not break the browsers of other readers and be unclickable. There is a difference between being knowledgeably cautious and paranoid.
.
No, the First Lady either buys her own clothes, or uses clothes that are donated or lent -- just like Nancy Reagan. The First Lady does not draw a salary. By custom, the First Lady will reimburse the government for her travel at a rate equal to a first-class ticket and the difference in accomodations versus the President traveling alone. If you have issues with President Obama attending a summit of the major world economies during a once-in-a-lifetime recession, you had better have something more germane than "what they got done over there".

wesgonsin
Jul 11, 2009 at 7:42 a.m.
Suggest removal

I do not visit any "tinyurl" links. Those links are for suckers and dumbells. One born every minute.....

wesgonsin
Jul 11, 2009 at 7:23 a.m.
Suggest removal

Not a taxpayer expense, huh? Telling me she doesn't have a full staff of fashion advisors at her beck and call?
.
And what about that trip to Italy? Why don't you search and Google how much they actually got done over there. And find out how much that little excursion costed us for a flight on Air Force One, while your at it.
.
And a short post script to NVgrf.... I only go to the Elks' wearing spikes when I want to meet up with your future wife at a cheap and sleazy motel.

chainsawchuckie
Jul 10, 2009 at 9:54 p.m.
Suggest removal

hey I'll pay him $20 to mow my lawn in those!! oh wait I live in an apartment.... LOL

NVgrf
Jul 10, 2009 at 9:43 p.m.
Suggest removal

wes is just jealous. He really wanted to wear those garments to the Elks Club. Complete with the spiked heels.

janesvillean
Jul 10, 2009 at 7:17 p.m.
Suggest removal

wesgonsin, whatever the First Lady's clothing and accessories cost, that is not a taxpayer expense. It certainly has nothing to do with Wisconsin's economic development policies. The purse in particular turned out to be not as expensive as claimed:
http://preview.tinyurl.com/lerfaa
.
As for the economic development story, I looked for a list of the touted tools and I did find one:
http://preview.tinyurl.com/n34xvk

wesgonsin
Jul 10, 2009 at 6:11 p.m.
Suggest removal

Wait a minute here.... Didn't Michelle Obama just finish up a whirlwind tour of Italy, wearing $15,000 garments wherever she stopped for a photo shoot?
.
Might be a little off topic, but it sure didn't take the Obama's long to settle right down into that Washington, D.C. type habit of needless, selfish spending of tax payer dollars.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT