ADVERTISEMENT

Wisconsin court: Witnesses cannot seek medical damages

By ASSOCIATED PRESS   Friday, July 10, 2009 - 12:19 p.m.
ADVERTISEMENT

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — The Wisconsin Supreme Court on Friday tossed out a $200,000 award to a father who watched one of his twin sons die during birth in 1998.

In a case closely watched by doctors and trial lawyers, the court ruled 5-2 that Wisconsin’s medical malpractice law does not allow bystanders to seek damages for emotional distress.

A judge in 2003 awarded Gregory Phelps of Pewaukee the damages as part of a $990,000 award to his family for wrongful death and medical malpractice.

Phelps had arrived at St. Joseph’s Hospital in Milwaukee after his wife, who had been identified as a high-risk patient. She was in intense pain and had not been treated properly by an unlicensed, first-year medical resident. Phelps helped his wife get to a commode, where she reached down and felt a baby’s toes extending from her.

He rushed to a nurses’ desk, where he found a doctor to deliver the baby, Adam. But attempts to resuscitate Adam failed, and the baby was pronounced dead as a result of asphyxia. The other twin, Kyle, was delivered and survived.

Writing for the majority, Justice Patience Roggensack said the medical resident, who was in a Medical College of Wisconsin training program, was acting as an employee of the hospital and therefore covered by the malpractice law.

The law spells out what claims can be made against health care providers and their employees, but makes no mention of allowing emotional distress claims by bystanders, she said.

In a dissent joined by Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson, Justice Ann Walsh Bradley said Phelps had satisfied every element of a claim for emotional distress.

"Phelps witnessed the spontaneous delivery of Adam," she wrote. "He witnessed the injuries and death of his son. I conclude that Phelps had a firsthand observation of the traumatic, injury-producing event."

The case became a flashpoint in Abrahamson’s re-election campaign in February after The Associated Press reported she collected a total of $11,500 in donations from three lawyers representing the Phelpses.

Her challenger, Judge Randy Koschnick, said it was unethical for her to take the money without recusing herself. Abrahamson brushed that off by saying she had raised so much money — nearly $1.4 million in total — she was beholden to no one donor.

The American Medical Association and the Wisconsin Medical Society, which represent doctors, had urged the justices in a friend-of-the-court brief to throw out the damages. They argued that allowing witnesses to seek malpractice damages would expand the potential liability of doctors and prompt more lawsuits.

But the Wisconsin Association for Justice, which represents trial lawyers, said that victims such as Phelps should be compensated for witnessing such traumatic events.




reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(13)
pheasanthunter
Jul 12, 2009 at 11:54 a.m.
Suggest removal

Our malpractice laws in Wisconsin are terrible. They were designed to hurt the trial attorneys who are hated by the WMC and AMA-Wisconsin, but as evidenced in this case, parents are victimized. A paramedic would likely have been able to detect a breech birth, yet this woman goes to the toilet under a resident's care and starts delivering? That is just WRONG: this father did not endure emotional distress? Everyone is a conservative until they get arrested and a liberal until they get mugged.

cheddar
Jul 12, 2009 at 10:28 a.m.
Suggest removal

A first year resident also was involved in the death of our child during childbirth at Saint Marys. The resident had been given orders from the attending physician but had failed to pass them along to the nurse.

TheAnswerIs42
Jul 10, 2009 at 8:26 p.m.
Suggest removal

Janesvillian - Thank you for providing more information as to the nature of the case.

GaryPrimer- I agree.

janesvillean
Jul 10, 2009 at 4:56 p.m.
Suggest removal

Ah, the basis for the malpractice is that the resident gave the mother a sedative and then disappeared for two hours, and apparently never contacted a senior physician for advice. That's the "had not been treated properly" that preceded the unsanctioned trip to the bathroom.
.
The entire award was under appeal using a key line of defense of the definition of "borrowed employee" (the resident actually worked for another provider), and the court did uphold that award as part of this same opinion, but excluded the father's emotional distress claim.
.
The overall award was also subject to questions about the wrongful death cap. This was much more complicated than the article summary makes it; practically all aspects of the case were reviewed.

MrScott
Jul 10, 2009 at 4:24 p.m.
Suggest removal

sorry, post should say "around" not "above"

MrScott
Jul 10, 2009 at 4:19 p.m.
Suggest removal

If I were part of a jury that had to decide a monetary value for this case, I would have found any agreed upon value over $500,000 would have been adequate for the case.

garyprimer
Jul 10, 2009 at 3:47 p.m.
Suggest removal

A man who loses a son is no mere bystander.

MrScott
Jul 10, 2009 at 2:16 p.m.
Suggest removal

PS - displacedworker if you're going to be picky I might as well too. The "T" after the "?" should be capitalized. Thank you for trying to act perfect but not being so. I'm rolling my eyes.

MrScott
Jul 10, 2009 at 2:12 p.m.
Suggest removal

my mistake displacedworker, I'm sorry that misreading a sentence is not up to your superior literary standards. Either way, $990,000 or 790,000, the Supreme Court got it right. Thank you displacedworker for not exercising tact.

MrScott
Jul 10, 2009 at 1:06 p.m.
Suggest removal

Thanks you Wisconsin Supreme Court for exercising restraint. I'm happy to see a slow decline in the number of excessive or frivolous settlements being handed out. The Phelps family received nearly a million dollars, which in a wrongful death seems adequate, but yet pushed the envelope of legality by seeking more and were rightfully struck down by the WI Supreme Court. I'll think twice next time I see Ambrahamson on the ballot.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT