ADVERTISEMENT

Wisconsin regulators to consider plans for wind farm

By ASSOCIATED PRESS   Wednesday, July 8, 2009 - 4:08 p.m.
ADVERTISEMENT

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — State regulators plan to vote Thursday on a Wisconsin utility’s plans to build a massive wind farm in southern Minnesota.

Wisconsin Power & Light Co., a subsidiary of Madison-based Alliant Energy, wants permission to start the first phase of the farm on 32,500 acres just north of Albert Lea in Freeborn County. Plans call for scores of turbines that would generate about 200 megawatts of electricity, enough to power 50,000 homes.

According to state estimates, the farm could cost nearly $500 million. Alliant officials say the cost is built into their plans to raise electric and natural gas rates by $91.7 million beginning in 2010. That translates to almost $9 more on a typical residential monthly electric bill and $2.40 more on a typical monthly residential gas bill. The farm would account for about $29.6 million of the total increase.

Alliant officials said the farm would help them meet requirements in Wisconsin law that the state get about 10 percent of its energy from renewable sources by 2015. Alliant must produce about 9 percent of its energy from renewable sources within the next six years to comply with individual utility requirements.

"This (is) an opportunity to position ourselves for the future,“ Alliant spokesman Steve Schultz said. WP&L purchased the land from Wind Capital Group LLC, a St. Louis-based developer, in March. The site was attractive because winds over the southern Minnesota prairies are consistently strong, the company said in a statement.

The first phase of the project calls for building about 122 turbines. Each would be 400 feet tall with 130-foot blades. They would be operational by 2011.

Schultz said the site is large enough to one day accommodate enough turbines to generate 400 megawatts, enough to power 100,000 homes. The farm then would be the largest in Minnesota, providing up to $1 million in tax revenue for Freeborn County and about two dozen jobs, according to Alliant.

The three-member Wisconsin Public Service Commission has jurisdiction over the project even though it would be built in Minnesota because it would affect WP&L customers’ rates.

Charlie Higley, executive director of the Madison-based advocacy group Citizens’ Utility Board, said the commission has reviewed the project with an eye toward issuing a so-called certificate of authority rather than a certificate of public convenience and necessity, which carries stricter review requirements.

As a result, questions linger about whether the farm is really needed, he said.

"We support renewable energy projects, but given what we believe to be a less-stringent analysis, it’s not clear whether this facility makes sense on a question of need or a question of cost,“ Higley said.

Commission spokesman Tim LeMonds said the panel will address Higley’s concerns during its meeting Thursday.

Alliant needs approval from Minnesota regulators as well. The Minnesota Public Utilities Commission is expected to consider the project within the next few months.

Hundreds of Freeborn County landowners support the plan, said Wayne Sorensen, the county’s planning and zoning director.

"A lot of people have been talking about the positive aspects of renewable energy and lowering our dependence on foreign oil,“ he said.

Sorensen said a group of about 10 citizens has regularly attended meetings to raise concerns about the health effects of living near a large wind turbine, which can be noisy.

Katie Troe, organizer of Safe Wind in Freeborn County, said Minnesota law allows a turbine to be built 500 feet from a home as long as the noise level is below 50 decibels — about the level of a washing machine — 54 minutes out of every hour.

Troe said she’s asking Minnesota regulators to require noise testing and make the company build the turbines at least 1,500 feet from homes.

"It’s not that we’re totally against wind, it’s that they’re putting it too close to people’s homes,“ Troe said.




reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(4)
kitfox
Jul 9, 2009 at 6:44 a.m.
Suggest removal

Let’s clear this up first; we do not generate electricity with oil. Building wind farms will not save 1 quart of foreign oil. The fact is each wind turbine will use several thousand gallons of oil every year in the gear box and hydraulic systems, as routine oil changes are performed by maintenance personnel.

Don’t be surprised to see the PSC rubber stamp this project just like the others they have reviewed. The PSC has shown a total disregard for the health and safety of Wisconsin citizens, so don’t expect them to care about the residents of Minnesota that will suffer the adverse impacts of siting industrial wind turbines too close to homes.

A few questions for the PSC to answer:

1. Why has the PSC, with all of its resources and experts, lagged behind in identifying and addressing the full spectrum of environmental concerns that exist with industrial wind turbines?

2. Where can consumers find out the amount of electricity consumed by wind turbines: e.g. to heat or cool generators and gearboxes, initiate blade rotation, power the yaw control and cable unwind system, power the blade pitch control, magnetize the stators, run operating lights, etc.?

3. What studies has the PSC done (or researched) that identify the low frequency sounds (infra sound) from wind turbines, and their effects on humans and animals?

4. What research has justified the choice of 50 dBA as an appropriate noise criterion, particularly for rural areas of the state?

5. How many miles of wind energy necessitated transmission lines will be needed in Wisconsin and Minnesota, what is their cost, and who is paying for them?

6. Why didn’t the PSC ask for a study to confirm any adverse health impacts from the Wisconsin Department of Health Service? (The Minnesota Department of Health completed a study in May of 2009 confirming that there are adverse impacts from industrial wind turbines)

7. The PSC should identify the independent research studies which prove that large industrial wind turbines do not adversely affect the health of residents whose home is within a 2500 foot radius of the turbines.

8. When determining industrial wind power rules and regulations, how does the PSC isolate itself from the well funded lobbying of those who stand to gain financially from subsidized wind energy development to protect the environment, and health, safety, and financial concerns of Wisconsin citizens?

Is an unreliable, intermittent, non-dispatchable, highly subsidized, source of electric power that important to our renewable energy future? Are wind turbines so important that we jeopardize the health, safety, property values, and property rights of Wisconsin and Minnesota citizens?

I think not! Building wind turbines is like putting a band aid on something that needs a major operation.

Wisconsin must be a leader not a follower in renewable energy.

janesvillean
Jul 8, 2009 at 9:55 p.m.
Suggest removal

SkyBlue62, that's not how the electric grid works. If you need to draw N megawatts of power, you need to buy N megawatts of power and add it to the grid. Now, it's true there are efficiency issues with long-distance transmission, but from a financial standpoint you are paying for the power you draw.

SkyBlue62
Jul 8, 2009 at 5:57 p.m.
Suggest removal

wow, I'll pay an average $11.40 more a month on my utility bill. so somebody in iowa and minnesota can consume the electric generated by these wind towers that won't put a drop of wattage into our rock county area.
.
I hope there is a public comments time at the wisconsin PSC. I have an earful to give them. and I'm not happy about this. I think Iowa and minnesota should foot the bill for this.
.
they're going to get all the electric from it. not us in Rock or Dane County, and all we get is a bill for the cost. seems rather unfair so wp&l can brag they reach their quota of 10% generated even though it doesn't power any wisconsin homes from this entire project.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT