Cell tower planned for Janesville church
From the WCLO newsroom:
US Cellular is asking the City of Janesville for permission to build a cell tower at St. Mark's Church on Mount Zion Avenue by the interstate.
Gale Price, manager of building and development services for the city, says the tower is proposed to be free-standing in a corner adjacent to a green belt. US Cellular wants to build a 120-foot tower with lattice frameworks extending out for cell equipment.
This technology is not unusual for ecclesiastical properties. A cell tower disguised as a light pole is in the works at a church parking lot in Beloit, and there's one hidden in a church steeple in Janesville's Fourth Ward.
A public hearing for the tower on the St. Mark's property is anticipated March 2nd.
Click here for an audio report.

Feb 19, 2009 at 8:51 a.m.
Suggest removal
"Welcome to St. McDonald's, would you like some fries and hot apple pie with that salvation?"
Feb 18, 2009 at 4:27 p.m.
Suggest removal
Separation of church and state is two-way in that a government established church is prohibited.
Tax exempt status is an erosion of this principal. Someday that will erosion will be eliminated.
Feb 18, 2009 at 3:09 p.m.
Suggest removal
Cell phone towers are the least of profit-making businesses now being welcomed onto TAX FREE church properties: "Redmond eased the approval process by using his McDonald's franchise license, and has agreed to oversee the management of the business. The church spent $150,000 on equipment for the franchise, will pay any additional operational costs, and will receive 100% of the profits." http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1...
Feb 18, 2009 at 2:19 p.m.
Suggest removal
It seems the church is allowing the tower for cash. Permission from the city is needed.
--------------
Separation of church and state is both ways.
If the church benefits from its tax exempt status, that effectively means the government and the taxpayers are financing the political activities of the church. This is wrong.
Feb 17, 2009 at 3:08 p.m.
Suggest removal
The attempt by religion to insert "intelligent design" in schools is barbaric.
SarahB, cell towers receive and transmit cell phone signals. Of course, people who pray don't need cell phones to talk to god, though all they allowed to do is leave voice mail.
Feb 17, 2009 at 2:56 p.m.
Suggest removal
Good grief! All I want to know is WHAT is a cell tower? WHY would anybody, even a church, want one? If anyone can find me hiding over here in my quiet corner, I would be grateful for the explanation.
Feb 17, 2009 at 12:06 p.m.
Suggest removal
And religions have every right to influence politics in this country, it's called freedom of speech. Any other group has the opportunity to impose their will on the political process just as much as any religious entity.
Feb 17, 2009 at 10:19 a.m.
Suggest removal
Religions impose their will on the this country by way of the political process regardless of what the rules are.
It is unfair for an owner to have to pay tax on the revenue earned from having a cell tower on his building while religions are exempt from that tax.
Feb 17, 2009 at 9:56 a.m.
Suggest removal
A church leader may not be able to speak directly to their congregation during an official church function, however, they are allowed to make their personal opinion known publicly (letter to editor, etc.) without recourse...
.
"
[R]eligious leaders cannot make partisan comments in official organization publications or at official church functions... religious leaders who speak or write in their individual capacity are encouraged to clearly indicate that their comments are personal and not intended to represent the views of the organization."
.
Even further, what is the definition of "political"? Is it strictly dealing with candidates? Are referendums included? -"organizations, including churches and religious organizations, are absolutely prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office... "- According to this from the IRS, they are only disallowed from speaking about particular candidates, not about issues.
.
One thing I don't agree with is churches are not required to disclose financial information to the public. This is especially and issue for those who use the name "church" for tele-evangelism and aren't required to disclose financial information.
Feb 17, 2009 at 9:39 a.m.
Suggest removal
The history of church tax exemption - http://hushmoney.org/501c3-facts.htm
Feb 17, 2009 at 8:01 a.m.
Suggest removal
bibledude, I read the OT and analyzed it. You memorized it as literal truth. That's the difference.
Feb 17, 2009 at 7:58 a.m.
Suggest removal
MiltonRedman, should a new religion get tax exempt status?
Feb 17, 2009 at 7:57 a.m.
Suggest removal
bibledude, when it comes to being NOT well read it is you. Darwin made a statement about the eye that is taken out of context by your ilk. He made that statement as lead-in to his explanation that the eye is matter of evolution -"half an eye is better than no eye."
Confirmation bias when it comes to reading and understanding is the problem of religionists.
Feb 16, 2009 at 11:39 p.m.
Suggest removal
1) I am a Christian 2) I believe in evolution and science 3) I'm not afraid of reality 4) all religious entities should get tax exempt status (Christian, Muslim, Jewish, etc.) 5) Churches are allowed to influence politicians all they way, however, they are not allowed to endorse specific politicians within the church.
Feb 16, 2009 at 10:39 p.m.
Suggest removal
Gazettefan- your lack of study of OT prophecy is very apparent, its hard to go into detail like I'd like on this board. Maybe when you have time compare Is. 53 written in 700 A.D. to the life of Christ. Its really best not to interject on matters you don't have a working knowledge of. You make blanket statements such as "Religion is for people who are afraid of reality." That is a subjective argument that has no basis in reality. The you say the world has no design? What about the human eye, even Darwin struggled with that reality. You do not see design in DNA? Just how complex do things have to get before you can see design???????
Feb 16, 2009 at 8:53 p.m.
Suggest removal
sluggo, why don't you explain your last comment in a little more detail.
Feb 16, 2009 at 8:11 p.m.
Suggest removal
Gazettefan.... you are wrong, the GAZETTE is for people who are afraid of reality.
Feb 16, 2009 at 8:09 p.m.
Suggest removal
I didnt realize bibledude brought it up.
Bibledude when did this article mention Obama?
Feb 16, 2009 at 6:38 p.m.
Suggest removal
Religion is for people who are afraid of reality.
Feb 16, 2009 at 6:25 p.m.
Suggest removal
no
Feb 16, 2009 at 6:12 p.m.
Suggest removal
There are powerful churches in this country always pressuring politicians for idiotic purposes.
Feb 16, 2009 at 6:08 p.m.
Suggest removal
Taxpayers should not have to subsidies the church by way of tax exempt status. upnorth...., are you in favor of tax exempt status for muslims here?
Read my posts again to get a grip on how religion damages human society.
Feb 16, 2009 at 6:05 p.m.
Suggest removal
bibledude brought him up.
Feb 16, 2009 at 6:01 p.m.
Suggest removal
upnorth.. When did this article mention Obama?
Feb 16, 2009 at 6 p.m.
Suggest removal
opps have the tower not have tower
Feb 16, 2009 at 5:59 p.m.
Suggest removal
I meant pro-life, NOT pro-choice!
Feb 16, 2009 at 5:59 p.m.
Suggest removal
For gods sake let the church have tower.AGIAN I ASK HOW DOES IT AFFECT YOU? Oh hold on ..IT DOES NOT!!
Feb 16, 2009 at 5:57 p.m.
Suggest removal
The church does not tell the congregation how to vote, gazfan. Why do you always have to bring up the same crap everytime you go into the "whole church" subject? It gets SOOOOOOOOO OLD. If you aren't a church member, what do you care how the funds are used etc.? It doesn't even affect you. Move on to something useful.
Feb 16, 2009 at 5:54 p.m.
Suggest removal
I don't consider Obama a Christian. It's not for me to judge, but ,I don't think a real Christian would sign a bill for pro-choice taxpayers to pay for abortions that women want to have done but cannot afford. A Christian doesn't sit in a church for 20 years and "not have a clue" about his "pastors" outrageous views. That's 2 biggies for me! The list goes on...
Feb 16, 2009 at 5:51 p.m.
Suggest removal
A religion loses its entitlement to respect when it seeks and accepts entitlement to government money (by way of tax exempt status) which comes from the taxpayers and is then used to impose its politics on everyone.
Feb 16, 2009 at 5:46 p.m.
Suggest removal
sweet....., how much respect do you have for Islam?
Feb 16, 2009 at 5:44 p.m.
Suggest removal
bibledude, all that irrationality is still there to varying degrees: Pat Robinson here: "On 911 the U.S. was punished by god for such and such." In Africa and eastern Europe the genocides are the result of christian on christian bible inspired tribalism.
I don't care if Aristole said it: The argument for a supernatural cause for the universe is not automatically allowed to abandoned itself once we get to a "cause": What caused the cause (what caused god?) ad infinitum?
So-called prophesy did not refer to the future that is our present. It referred to what was going on at the time the events happened or when the events were recorded or fabricated. All horrible events, real or fabricated, were supposed to be god's vengeance.
There is no "design". What is referred to as design is a description of a phenomenon known as natural selection.
All societies are similar because the apparent diversity (and spreading of groups) we see has only taken place in world-time in the blink of an eye. What humans basically are started with a small group -the first members of the species- not very long ago. The morality we live by today began long before Moses and the Old Testament. That morality was co-opted by the first monotheistic religion. That morality is a matter societal evolution.
Scripture is the basis for belief but it's not a good basis. It gives "supernatural" sanction to tribalistic violence. Islam came from judeo-christian scripture.
Feb 16, 2009 at 5:18 p.m.
Suggest removal
elmooso, if you are still looking for gods number, just ask bruce almighty. lol
Feb 16, 2009 at 5:16 p.m.
Suggest removal
I think people just cant understand that everyone has their own beliefs. If you could have the mentality that everyone is entitled to believe what they believe in and that we could agree to disagree on the topic, maybe we wouldnt have all this craziness. No one religion is better than the other, no person is better than the other. Why cant people understand that our faith is what we believe and just accept that we are all different?
Feb 16, 2009 at 5:06 p.m.
Suggest removal
north too funny
Feb 16, 2009 at 4:50 p.m.
Suggest removal
.....wow..tnimmo89...
Feb 16, 2009 at 4:10 p.m.
Suggest removal
gazettefan- I agree with you on this, scripture is one reason to have faith in God. Fulfilled Biblical prophecies are truly amazing. Aristotle's cosmological argument that there must be an Uncaused Cause is another (good old irrational Aristotle). The teleological argument is another, seeing design in the world and the complexity of life, DNA etc. The moral argument is another, if life is random why do societies have such similar moral codes? The ontological argument is another, but I agree with you scripture is a good reason for faith.
Feb 16, 2009 at 4:07 p.m.
Suggest removal
...wow...Janesville...
Feb 16, 2009 at 3:59 p.m.
Suggest removal
tjncj, how did you determine what was in my post? psychic powers?
Hitler was a christian who never renounced his Catholicism. He and his regime were never denounced by the pope. German christians fervently supported him. Slaughtering millions of Jews was inspired by the biblical dictates of god and the christian church.
Feb 16, 2009 at 3:59 p.m.
Suggest removal
I'm still trying to call God..anybody have his number?
Feb 16, 2009 at 3:54 p.m.
Suggest removal
bilbledude, MiltonRedman, in scripture god tells men to sell their daughters to other men. They did it because god said to do it. Scripture is the basis for believing in god.
Feb 16, 2009 at 3:51 p.m.
Suggest removal
MiltonRedman, the point is: If the revenue from the tower isn't taxed, then the government is financing the political activity of the church. It's obvious.
Feb 16, 2009 at 3:18 p.m.
Suggest removal
I watched a documentary on Hitler and the actual plots to kill him by his officers during the war. His propaganda campaign against the Jews reminded me of GF's current diatribe against everything Christian. I hope GF never becomes our furor, I don't think he could find enough furnaces or lions for all of us.
Feb 16, 2009 at 3:16 p.m.
Suggest removal
Gazettefan-you are really grasping at straws here. Yes the Mesopotamian civilization had some weird customs I'll grant you that. Your point however was that worshipping God is irrational. Believing that if there is a design there must be a designer and that that being should be worshipped is very rational. To say that the 2 billion people in this world that are Christians are irrational to me is a very arrogant assertion.
Feb 16, 2009 at 3:10 p.m.
Suggest removal
Wow, those scathing ancient Abrahamic texts which aren't even practiced in the church today! Yep, because I see tons of Christian fathers selling their daughters today. Stop at any church in Janesville, daughters are 50% off - post-valentines day sale.
Feb 16, 2009 at 3:06 p.m.
Suggest removal
The story is about a cell phone tower at a church, next thing you know a notable anti-Christian mentions they shouldn't be allowed to participate in politics (WAY off topic) and the thread spirals out of control. Another round of applause for GazetteFan hijacking a thread to further his mission against the Christian church.
Feb 16, 2009 at 2:31 p.m.
Suggest removal
bibledude, christianity is an Abrahamic religion. The scripture of Abrahamic religions has god commanding men to sell their daughters to other men.
Feb 16, 2009 at 2:28 p.m.
Suggest removal
upnorth, as individuals, OK. But misogynistic voting blocks under the guise of "pro-life" should be kept at bay.
Feb 16, 2009 at 1:56 p.m.
Suggest removal
upnorthwi- Are you including Obama is your assertion?
Feb 16, 2009 at 1:54 p.m.
Suggest removal
Gazettefan- All Religion is irrational according to you right? Are you are a naturalist? I call irrational any world view that thinks life can come from non-life, intelligence from non-intelligence, order from chaos. As for the church in question more power to them (pun intended).
Feb 16, 2009 at 1:50 p.m.
Suggest removal
See what I mean? All those Christians are so irrational they shouldn't have anything to do with politics or any decisions that would affect our daily living.
Feb 16, 2009 at 1:38 p.m.
Suggest removal
Geees big deal!
Feb 16, 2009 at 1:32 p.m.
Suggest removal
Maybe the revenue from something like this isn't tax free -even for a church. Does anyone know?
Feb 16, 2009 at 1:30 p.m.
Suggest removal
north...., wow, what a crazy outburst!!!
random....., the irrational basis for all religions alone should disqualify them from involvement in the political process.
Things are bad enough, all religions do is aggravate the instinctual tribal frictions in humans.
Feb 16, 2009 at 1:15 p.m.
Suggest removal
sluggo, gazfan opposes ANYTHING that ANY church does. I'm sure this tower will now be attracting all pedophiles to the church, so STAY away!!!!
Feb 16, 2009 at 12:55 p.m.
Suggest removal
gazettefan,I would agree with that as long as all other not for profit organization would also. not just the ones you pick.
Feb 16, 2009 at 12:43 p.m.
Suggest removal
How on earth does this affect any of you?
Feb 16, 2009 at 11:50 a.m.
Suggest removal
Churches in general shouldn't officially be allowed to insert themselves into the political process.
Feb 16, 2009 at 11:43 a.m.
Suggest removal
Who said they were involved in politics?
Feb 16, 2009 at 11:07 a.m.
Suggest removal
Yes tax them. Or at least ban them from involvement in politics.
Feb 16, 2009 at 10:32 a.m.
Suggest removal
Will I be able to call God now??
Feb 16, 2009 at 9:18 a.m.
Suggest removal
The Omen, Part V: Requiem for a Landline
.
"Father, I'm concerned about the intentions of the Church in this matter."
.
"I know, my son. Text SATAN666 - airtime free."
Feb 16, 2009 at 8:22 a.m.
Suggest removal
Then they should be taxed
Feb 16, 2009 at 7:52 a.m.
Suggest removal
Revenue for the church?
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.