Mercury Marine: 2 sides to meet
FOND DU LAC, Wis. (AP) — Mercury Marine President Mark Schwabero has agreed to meet with union leaders who rejected a package of wage and benefit concessions the boat engine maker says it needs to keep jobs in Fond du Lac.
Mercury Marine spokesman Steve Fleming said Monday the meeting is Tuesday at the request of International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, Local 1947.
Union leaders did not immediately return telephone messages Monday.
The union reported Sunday that its members overwhelmingly voted to reject what Mercury Marine called its final offer to rework a labor contract signed a year ago.
The company said Sunday it would move many of its Fond du Lac manufacturing operations to a nonunion plant in Stillwater, Okla., over the next two to three years.

Aug 25, 2009 at 1:28 p.m.
Suggest removal
Just be happy that you have a job period. Quit your pissing and moaning and get back to work. It has been 8 months since I was laid off. The cut they are asking you to take can't be worse than sitting at home on unemployment. You union whiners make me sick.
Aug 25, 2009 at 7:54 a.m.
Suggest removal
Genius move. A wage cut that could be 10-20% less (specifics were not given) or a job cut of 100%. In today's economy take the concessions to ensure that you still have a job. Yet another boneheaded UNION move!
Aug 25, 2009 at 6:57 a.m.
Suggest removal
miltonalum; If you were good at what you did no company would have laid you off and not called you back. --- your making the point of the union bashers here, They CAN'T hire you back no matter how good you are. I'm sure there have been literally hundreds of good workers that were laid off from GM in jvl over the years that were better workers than those that had been there for 20,25 or 30+ years. Its called seniority. I understand construction is different but in manufacturing, this is the way it works. This is also a BIG part of the problem - they get complacent, particulariliy GMers. I cant tell you how many times I heard this when GM went to 1 line: I'm an 86er, I should be fine the "new hires" will go before me. This is just wrong. The mentality that a Co. "owes" me because Ive been here x years is crap.
Aug 25, 2009 at 6:11 a.m.
Suggest removal
miltonalum; nice try but did you read what I wrote - RESIDENTIAL Contractors. All you listed are Commercial contractors. My FACTS are right.
Aug 25, 2009 at 6:02 a.m.
Suggest removal
Quote "How many union residential contractors are in the Janesville area? No Plubmers, No Heating Contractors, No Roofers, No Carpet Installers, No General Contractors, No Masons, No Cement Finishers, No Painters - shall I continue? They CAN'T SURVIVE in this market"
.
JPCullen, Debco, Scherer, Magill, Findorff, DeGarmo, Butters Fetting, Cornerstone, Middleton Concrete.
.
Just a few of the "union" contractors that dont exist in this area, get your facts straight.
.
-Quote- "One in the 80's, And one in the 90's. And you know what? Do you think they ever did anything for me? "
.
Unions have their slouches just like everywhere else, if you arent a hard worker and good at what your doing you get that rep and companies dont want you, If you didnt make it in a union dont blame the union, look in the mirror. too many people join a union and expect that they should have a job and the "union" should get one for them. You still have to work, If you were good at what you did no company would have laid you off and not called you back.
Aug 25, 2009 at 4:25 a.m.
Suggest removal
Wisconsin needs to become a "Right-to-Work" state.
Aug 24, 2009 at 9:19 p.m.
Suggest removal
If there are many that are not happy with the proposed changes they should still have voted yes and then taken their time looking for what they wanted at another business. Why take others down with them in a lost cause? It effects the whole community not just them.
Aug 24, 2009 at 9:15 p.m.
Suggest removal
woodsman - maybe 40-50 years ago you were correct. today your just plain wrong or at the very least a hypocrite. Yes, unions had their place but the fact is they hurt more than help today. They were crated before OSHA, before 401k, ROTH IRA, etc ... they're "work" is done & they are ineffective today.
Hypocrite: typical Pro union, Buy American , Chest Thumper. Who do you call when you need work done at your home? NOT a union contractor. When you are the employee its gimmee, gimmee but when YOU are writing the check, its low bid, low bid, low bid. How many union residential contractors are in the Janesville area? No Plubmers, No Heating Contractors, No Roofers, No Carpet Installers, No General Contractors, No Masons, No Cement Finishers, No Painters - shall I continue? They CAN'T SURVIVE in this market, yet Janesville is a "union town" - yeah right! The ONLY Residential Contractors in the area are the electricians. Why? I believe its because of the like clock work shut downs at GM twice a year for years & it just made sense for them to be union as they could count on the shutdown to make 10's of 1,000's of dollars.
Aug 24, 2009 at 8:03 p.m.
Suggest removal
These people are fools voting down this deal, they might as well say goodbye to there jobs, someone in oklahoma will be doing it soon. Wake up people quit being some hard headed the union only cares about the union not the people in it.
Aug 24, 2009 at 7:45 p.m.
Suggest removal
Milton, the problem is everything went from one extreme to the other, no happy medium.
Aug 24, 2009 at 4:58 p.m.
Suggest removal
All of you union haters can thank the unions for what your non-union jobs are paying, because without unions you too would be making minimum wage. I will agree that unions sometimes get a bit greedy, however, they set the bar for what non union jobs pay too, beleive it or not they helped every single one of you union haters.
.
That said, the workers do need to agree to some concessions, 7 years of a pay freeze is too long, but 3 or 4 max should do the trick.
Aug 24, 2009 at 4:52 p.m.
Suggest removal
This time it's competition with an Oklahoma plant, next time it will be competition with Mexico. So even if the workers cave in this time, who says these jobs will be here for the long run? American manufacturing employees cannot compete with the slave wages "American" companies can easily pay in the third world thanks to NAFTA. Unless and until this issue is addressed, these jobs are going to continue to pay less and less and eventually will not pay enough to pay for the gas and car maintenance to get to work every day.
Aug 24, 2009 at 3:36 p.m.
Suggest removal
woodsman-yes we are thankfull for what unions have done to get better working conditions and pay, but this isn't the 1920's and 1930's. The fallacy is that unions will always want more and more regardless. Greed is greed whether you're a CEO or a union laborer. I'm sick of both.
Aug 24, 2009 at 3:15 p.m.
Suggest removal
Mayhem your an idiot! Either that or you know "NOTHING" about UNION'S. So your saying all the bloodshed years ago was in vain? NO,if it weren't for union's YOUR pay wouldn't be what it is today. I think you better study history some,before you bash another union,O.K. buckoo!
Aug 24, 2009 at 3:09 p.m.
Suggest removal
oldtimer probably thinks rick wagoner of GM making $10,000 an hour is still justified.
Aug 24, 2009 at 2:59 p.m.
Suggest removal
I hope they can get this resolved. I would suggest a uniform cut across the board. 7 years of a salary freeze is long. Maybe 2 or three years. They need to keep the talks going.
Aug 24, 2009 at 2:38 p.m.
Suggest removal
Yet another great union!!....UNIONS SUCK !! They did a whole lot for GM and every other union place that has closed up. A cut in pay is better than no job at all!!
Aug 24, 2009 at 2:25 p.m.
Suggest removal
Yeah, that would be in a perfect world. And Lord knows, this ain't.
Aug 24, 2009 at 1:38 p.m.
Suggest removal
busch, not how it works in reality.
Aug 24, 2009 at 1:37 p.m.
Suggest removal
The vote affects more than just union and management. There are hundreds of salaried (non-management) workers affected by the decisions of the union employees. Granted, they were asked to agree to some big changes (especially in the case of lay-offs). However, I don't think this is the economy to try to call the company's bluff. Mercury's management is stuck in the middle--don't want to move the company but they also know what it will take to keep them in Fond du Lac. Brunswick, the parent, gets the final decision. They have no ties to the local economy so they only need to consider the bottom line. It would be in the union's best interest to work with Mercury and keep their jobs.
Aug 24, 2009 at 1:13 p.m.
Suggest removal
busch, apparently you never owned a business? employees just clock in, do their job and clock out, mangement has to deal with all kinds of problems, regulations etc you have no idea.
Aug 24, 2009 at 12:46 p.m.
Suggest removal
I hope that if Management is expecting the workers to take cuts...that they are too! Cuts should be taken across the board.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.