ADVERTISEMENT

Federal judge refuses new criminal cases

By ASSOCIATED PRESS   Monday, August 24, 2009 - 8:49 a.m.
ADVERTISEMENT

MILWAUKEE (AP) — A federal judge in Milwaukee has not taken new criminal cases in over a month.

The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reports U.S. District Judge J.P. Stadtmueller's recusal orders cite law saying judges must pass off a case if they give an opinion on it, but he has not explained his actions further.

He did not immediately respond to an inquiry Monday by The Associated Press.

Professor Laurie Levenson, from Loyola Law School in Los Angeles, says she's never heard of a similar situation.

This spring, the U.S. attorney's office challenged Stadtmueller at the 7th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals. Prosecutors accused him of showing bias in a 2005 gun case and breaking federal rules by suggesting they strike a plea deal.

Stadtmueller wondered how the case had taken so much time and why it was in federal court.




reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(4)
coyote
Aug 24, 2009 at 12:37 p.m.
Suggest removal

Typical Judge, thinking they are more important and more powerful than they are or should be. In my humble opinion, of course.

janesvillean
Aug 24, 2009 at 10:40 a.m.
Suggest removal

He is taking civil cases and there are many more civil cases than criminal ones, but the latter consume half of the time judges spend on cases. Judges have a lot of discretion usually in choosing their docket and usually such things are resolved amongst colleagues, but this does seem to be unusual. It's not at all clear that it's permanent. He seems to be organizing a sort of one-man strike.
.
"Underlying that dispute was a concern by Stadtmueller - and shared by other judges - about the kind of cases coming into federal court. Because of congressional changes, federal court has shifted from mostly complex white-collar and organized crime to more low-level drug, gun and child pornography cases."
http://www.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee/5...

sannio
Aug 24, 2009 at 10:19 a.m.
Suggest removal

Perhaps he has a good reason.

cynicaleye
Aug 24, 2009 at 9:15 a.m.
Suggest removal

Perhaps he should be removed from the bench if he is not going to do his job.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT