ADVERTISEMENT

Juvenile detention center reducing population

By TED SULLIVAN   Thursday, August 13, 2009 - 5:14 a.m.
ADVERTISEMENT

The Rock County Juvenile Detention Center has been ordered to deny the lockup of dangerous kids to reduce its daily population and make the case for closing the facility, officials said Wednesday.

The practice could be a risk to public safety, said Ryan Booth, juvenile detention center union supervisor.

Juvenile probation supervisors also have been ordered to dismiss or “no action” referrals from law enforcement to reduce the caseload, said Kathleen Lichtfuss, former superintendent of the detention center.

“If you limit the number of referrals to the facility, you can make the argument that it’s not needed,” she said. “The bottom line is money.”

Rock County Human Services will provide an option of closing or partially closing the detention center in 2010 to save up to $400,000 in a tight budget.

A public hearing was held Wednesday at the Job Center, and about a dozen people spoke in favor of keeping the facility open.

For a full story, read Thursday's Janesville Gazette, read online in the Gazette’s E-Edition or check back at GazetteXtra.com.




reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(30)
SweetMentalRevenge
Aug 21, 2009 at 4:36 p.m.
Suggest removal

This news is the best news I have heard all year long! Now the "big" union can crumble just as the other "big" union did in janesville. I think it is beautiful that some of the insecure employees(who thought that they were secure) will fall flat on their faces!!!

"Waaaah, Waaah, Waaaaaah"

victims2009
Aug 14, 2009 at 2:09 p.m.
Suggest removal

Has anyone considered how the victims of juvenile crimes would be affected by this? Or has everyone already forgotten about the Rotary Gardens being vandalized?; what about the the juvenile who was lit on fire a few years ago, what about the school being vandalized 2 summers ago? How would the victims of these crimes and other juvenile crimes feel about seeing the perpetrator walking around free the next day? If anyone believes the juvenile offenders would be sent to corrections you are mistaken. If they don't have money to keep the juvenile detention center open then why would they pay to send them to corrections? It is my understanding that the juveniles can't be housed at the jail because the jail is too full already. It would be a huge mistake to close the juvenile detention center.

NeuroMed
Aug 13, 2009 at 3:27 p.m.
Suggest removal

Cut costs at the facility instead of closing the facility. Why should inmates, adult or juvenile, have cable television, just for an example?? I can't even afford stuff like cable tv right now and I work full time and have never so much as stolen a paper clip! It's ridiculous.

melstew47
Aug 13, 2009 at 2:28 p.m.
Suggest removal

the dangerous kids should be housed at the county jail,they do serious crimes they need to be put in jail.and before you ask,yes i do know from experience.and were we good parents? yes we were.we tried everything in the book,listened to all the councelors,doctors,probation officers,none of them knew what the hell they were talking about either.we tried meds, therapy,
tons of money spent.he hit the county jail at 15 and he survived in there just fine. most of those kids at the detention center have been there numerous times.they send them there over and over and over,its a waste of money.send them to corrections and theyll straighten up.internet and cable tv dont make kids bad,always trying to lay the blame somewhere else except where it needs to be layed,my son never watched that much tv and we had no computers at the time,he just refused to conform to society and obey the rules,and the only place that got him was locked up. dont get me wrong i love him more than anything in the world,and he chose not to act civil.kids make their own choices so if their bad they choose to be,so dont be blaming everything and everyone for their own decisions.put them in jail,maybe theyll make better choices after that.

momof1
Aug 13, 2009 at 1:45 p.m.
Suggest removal

Here's an idea.....make all people take personality tests and undergo psychological exams and get license's to even breed. Then, we won't have the problems we have today. Parents that leave their children unattended with the internet and cable tv and to run the streets to do whatever they want are the downfall of American Children.

Mikki
Aug 13, 2009 at 12:46 p.m.
Suggest removal

Better to have worked there then stayed there.

truecitizen
Aug 13, 2009 at 11:42 a.m.
Suggest removal

Did anyone every think about NOT listening to what should be considered an illegal or immoral order? Simply continue doing your jobs and deny the bureaucrat's orders. Maybe these individuals should be removed from office. Just listen to these posts, no one agrees with this story/ decision.

truecitizen
Aug 13, 2009 at 11:37 a.m.
Suggest removal

"...to make the case for closing..." THIS is how bureaucrats run everything. Until society figures out how to stop our increasing deliquent uprising, we should continue to place them into detention. So what do these bureaucrats want us to do then? Maybe Wisconsin should step in and redirect this story?

rexkramer
Aug 13, 2009 at 11:10 a.m.
Suggest removal

Yet another decision that will have significant consequences, sort of like closing the mental health and detox facilities. I'm all for responsible spending by government but I guarantee you that if you took just some of the money that county government has squandered on less important projects that the JDC could be adequately funded. Public safety should be at the top of the list when it comes to making out a budget, not the other way around. All this will do is undermine law enforcement's efforts to curb juvenile crime. You think that the repeat offenders won't get the message soon that they can get away with almost anything and be released the same day? At least with the JDC operating as it was these kids were taken off the streets for awhile. What happens when the cops get a 13 year old who commits a serious crime, say a battery, and there are no parents available to release them to? I'll tell you, taxpayer funded babysitting, that's what. This is the county simply shifting the responsibility and cost to the local municipalities.

reader
Aug 13, 2009 at 10:36 a.m.
Suggest removal

"For years Janesville did not have a juvenile detention center, and thing were fine."

Not true, before the detention center was built, the juveniles were housed at the Rock County jail.

sannio
Aug 13, 2009 at 9:52 a.m.
Suggest removal

I'm sure there's more to this story that the Gazette has chosen not to print in order to stir controversy, and sell printed editions.

wtp
Aug 13, 2009 at 9:15 a.m.
Suggest removal

I was given a tour of the facility a few years back by a former employee. Most of the kids that was in there had it much better off then they ever did at home. they have 3 meals a day, a full size exercise gym, TV and list goes one. Most of the time they are in a day room where they all can hang out and spend time with each other in a safe setting. They go to classes every day to learn ABC and some began a new direction in life other then crime. I really think this is a mistake to drop this worth while program for kids who are lost in life. Some of the kids after graduation join the military service and become a productive citizen.

SwissChick
Aug 13, 2009 at 8:42 a.m.
Suggest removal

More "dangerous kids" on the run?? Guess I'll have to hunker down and barricade myself! Geez! What are they thinking and who thought up this assinine brainstorm?

in_my_opinion
Aug 13, 2009 at 8:40 a.m.
Suggest removal

Who ordered it?

JJackson
Aug 13, 2009 at 8:26 a.m.
Suggest removal

They would be crazy to close the juvenile detention center. I used to work there and at the time, they used to contract with other counties to house their inmates in our facility.

If it's a money,why don't they try and do that again.

Mikki
Aug 13, 2009 at 8:01 a.m.
Suggest removal

I take it you know this from experience.

transformer07
Aug 13, 2009 at 7:59 a.m.
Suggest removal

Mack10:
The problem with the Youth Home was it was not secured. You would have juveniles who were brought in and shortly later, they run away hence them needing to build a secure side...

thetruth53545
Aug 13, 2009 at 7:31 a.m.
Suggest removal

Numbers are altered when probation officers are told not to take juveniles in custody... If POs were allowed to but them in and cases were not being thrown out, JDC would have a full house.

dogs_rule
Aug 13, 2009 at 7:15 a.m.
Suggest removal

"The Rock County Juvenile Detention Center has been ORDERED to deny the lockup of dangerous kids to reduce its daily population"---"Juvenile probation supervisors also have been ORDERED to dismiss or “no action” referrals from law enforcement" Again, I want to know WHO ordered this.

not2crazeeyet
Aug 13, 2009 at 7:04 a.m.
Suggest removal

I am confused. How is it that you can "make the case" for anything? Doesn't this mean you are altering the data and therefore changing the outcome. I could understand closing this facility if the current population didn't warrant it being open. But it seems to me, if we have a consistant population inside the facility that we need the facility. As for saving money, really it is sad that we need such a facility, but is this really a practical place to cut funds?

gpawcat
Aug 13, 2009 at 6:37 a.m.
Suggest removal

$400,000 is not a lot of money when the Governor took 25 million from the cell phone overpayment and 50 million in stimulus and gave back to the counties, after cutting 83 million from the budget to the counties, after raiding the highway trust fund of $427 million and putting the money into the Administration budget, after raising our license plate and drivers license fees.

thetruth53545
Aug 13, 2009 at 6:24 a.m.
Suggest removal

What you mean by ordering measures?

dogs_rule
Aug 13, 2009 at 6:04 a.m.
Suggest removal

WHO has ordered these measures?

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT