ADVERTISEMENT

GM recalls 1.5 million vehicles due to potential engine fires

By BETH WHEELOCK   Monday, April 13, 2009 - 6:30 p.m.
ADVERTISEMENT

From the Associated Press:

General Motors Corp. is recalling 1.5 million vehicles because of potential engine fires.

GM said there have been no reports of any fires or injuries.

Some of the recalled vehicles are no longer in production. The recall includes the 1998-1999 Oldsmobile Intrigue, the 1997-2003 Pontiac Grand Prix, 1997-2003 Buick Regal, and the 1998-2003 Chevrolet Lumina, Monte Carlo and Impala.

It involves vehicles with a 3.8-liter V6 engine. The government says drops of oil could fall into the exhaust system and cause a fire in the engine.

GM spokesman Kerry Christopher said it was a precautionary measure for consumers.




reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(44)
beeferer
Apr 15, 2009 at 5:14 a.m.
Suggest removal

MiltonRedmen- Interesting about the other recall, but my car's recall was for the same reason as this one. I noticed that this recall is for naturally aspirated engines whereas mine was for supercharged engines.

TomTiff465
Apr 14, 2009 at 9:12 p.m.
Suggest removal

3.8L V6 is a good engine; been around since the seventies! Just need to figure a good way to route exhaust around it!

klick
Apr 14, 2009 at 7:51 p.m.
Suggest removal

MiltonRedmen your right the 3.8 is a good engine. also the 2.8 v6 /3.1 was pretty good
and the 2.5 4 cylinder i think most refered to this engine as the iron duke.

spark
Apr 14, 2009 at 4:52 p.m.
Suggest removal

CitizenOne - Grammar must not have come with that engineering degree. And didn't you just admit to being a pothead and wishing people get into bad wrecks and die from drinking on the hockey team topic? Which by the way, those comments were removed.

spinmaster
Apr 14, 2009 at 4:48 p.m.
Suggest removal

I'm only pointing out the spelling errors is because it's a little hypocritical to be spouting off about being educated and all that if you can't spell.

woodsman
Apr 14, 2009 at 4:41 p.m.
Suggest removal

"ONE"I hate to pick,but,and i hate it when the spell patrol is out.But some one didn't learn how to spell very good in school,i have an excuse,but you don't,MR.PERFECTTTTT!!!! You praise your parents,but they must have forgotten to teach you compassion for man kind!!

spinmaster
Apr 14, 2009 at 4:31 p.m.
Suggest removal

So, CitizenOne, when you went to "UW Mil", did you take an English class that perhaps had spelling in the curriculum? Doesn't look like it. But I won't say I disagree with some of your points...

TheJoker
Apr 14, 2009 at 3:25 p.m.
Suggest removal

I heard the Janesville Task Force is trying to get GM to open the Janesville plant so they can fix all of these recalled vehicles. They feel "the door is still open" for GM to agree to this. So it looks like the workers may be called back to work!

woodsman
Apr 14, 2009 at 2:53 p.m.
Suggest removal

I guess in this world,all we have left is faith,& no new taxes! Neither,seem to be working very well.

cjjs35
Apr 14, 2009 at 2:20 p.m.
Suggest removal

Ok Woodsman fair is fair. GM has no money. GM is closing plants. GM is reducing hours at plants that are open. If they do file bankrupcy how long will the government want to wait to collect their/our money? To many signs point to their inability to repay the money back.

woodsman
Apr 14, 2009 at 2:12 p.m.
Suggest removal

I guess "YOU" would have to show ME,where they can't pay it back,only fair! I suppose "IF" they went under,the government would put a judgment on things,until they are satisfied,like things are done in the real world. I know i can't,being only one,save this company,but the chevy line of cars,IMO,are compared to the mouse trap,no matter who tries to improve vehicles ,they "ARE" the best on this planet.JMO

anonomouse
Apr 14, 2009 at 1:12 p.m.
Suggest removal

GM is not going to be able to pay off the loan, Most of us know that. Some of us are in denial that Generous Motors went under.

cjjs35
Apr 14, 2009 at 12:48 p.m.
Suggest removal

Woodsman show me where and how GM can pay back the money the got in the BAILOUT? I am no expert never claimed to be. Just know what I see.

SuperDave
Apr 14, 2009 at 12:10 p.m.
Suggest removal

Don't get too hung up on the semantics. I prefer to call it a loan also, mainly to distinguish the loans to GM and Chrysler from the outright gifts to the financial sector. But according to Wikipedia, the loans to the auto companies could be considered a bailout.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bailout
The first sentence: "In economics, a bailout is an act of loaning or giving capital to a failing business in order to save it from bankruptcy, insolvency, or total liquidation and ruin".
Now there's another word: bankruptcy. Like it or not folks, GM is in de facto bankruptcy. I think that the national government, and GM, will go to great lengths to prevent an actual filing, but that appears to be inevitable.

woodsman
Apr 14, 2009 at 11:53 a.m.
Suggest removal

Maybe these people that DON'T know the difference between a "LOAN & BAILOUT"?? They must run their lives like,hey buddy,give me a LOAN,after the fact when asked to return the loan monies,they say,THANX FOR BAILING me out bud!! Trust,you must have Trust my friend!

janesvillean
Apr 14, 2009 at 11:02 a.m.
Suggest removal

Unless GM goes completely under in a liquidation bankruptcy, they will remain obligated to repay the temporary loan they were given, which is considered a prepayment on the overall bailout proposal.
.
By the way, the Chrysler loans they were given (and repaid) in the 1980s were called a bailout. I don't know where people get the idea the money does not have to be repaid.

anonomouse
Apr 14, 2009 at 10:16 a.m.
Suggest removal

MiltonRedMan doesn't matter how reliable it is if its a fire hazard now does it?

MiltonRedmen
Apr 14, 2009 at 10:03 a.m.
Suggest removal

Actually anonomouse, the engine in the vehicles being recalled (the 3.8L Series II) is one of the most reliable motors ever built by anyone and was on Ward's Top 10 engines list for that time period. It is an extremely reliable motor and the last GM 3.8L I had went well over 300,000 miles before it began to have any issues. In fact, the GM 3.8 is one of the most sought after motors of its era.

MiltonRedmen
Apr 14, 2009 at 10 a.m.
Suggest removal

befferer - this recall by GM was issued April 8, 2009 according to the NHTSA website. There was a previous recall to some 3.8 vehicles for potential engine fire due involving the fuel pressure regulator causing the manifold to crack and injectors to leak potentially causing a fire. That recall was issued in 2004, this is a different item.

anonomouse
Apr 14, 2009 at 10 a.m.
Suggest removal

We all know GM will be unable to pay back this *cough,cough* Loan. I'm glad this article is showing GM quality I've been hearing about here.

woodsman
Apr 14, 2009 at 9:40 a.m.
Suggest removal

cjjs: So WHO makes you an expert to be positive that G.M. will not pay the gov. back? So you are saying that the REAL bailout's will NOT be paid back either,"RIGHT"

SuperDave
Apr 14, 2009 at 9:18 a.m.
Suggest removal

GM recalls better times.

joeflint
Apr 14, 2009 at 8:49 a.m.
Suggest removal

I'll take GM's track record of car fires over Ford's any day, lol.

EMMO46
Apr 14, 2009 at 8:46 a.m.
Suggest removal

I wish that the last three GM vehicles I had would have burned up!
I was the only one burned by repair costs and depreciation.

cjjs35
Apr 14, 2009 at 8:37 a.m.
Suggest removal

Woodsman a loan is something you pay back. GM has no intention of paying back the money the government gave them. Therefore it is a bailout.

woodsman
Apr 14, 2009 at 8:21 a.m.
Suggest removal

SORRY CHAINSAW: But G.M. DID NOT GET A BAIL OUT,it was a LOANNNNNNNNNN!!!

916WI
Apr 14, 2009 at 8:20 a.m.
Suggest removal

I would get the recall serviced ASAP......From the latest reports GM is one step away from bankruptcy.....It will take some time to reorganize. If this recall applies to anyone, it might be a good idea to get it taken care of....

Lost_city
Apr 14, 2009 at 7:24 a.m.
Suggest removal

That is what they could use the plant for. A recall center.

beeferer
Apr 14, 2009 at 4:52 a.m.
Suggest removal

I received word of this a couple of years ago. It only took a few minutes to correct the problem. Why is it hitting the media just now?

cmfnf
Apr 13, 2009 at 11:22 p.m.
Suggest removal

I believe it's the manifold. My son had 1 blow up a few years ago. He did research and found that they had had recalls with earlier models. They bought his car back.

MiltonRedmen
Apr 13, 2009 at 8:39 p.m.
Suggest removal

Oh poopy, I just bought a '98 Lumina LTZ with the 3.8.

janesvillean
Apr 13, 2009 at 8:15 p.m.
Suggest removal

"Apparently, some of these engines can drop oil onto the exhaust manifold during hard braking. If that manifold has gotten hot enough and the oil dribbles below the heat shield, it can start a small fire. The flames can then engulf the plastic spark plug wire channel, potentially resulting in a full-on engine compartment fire.

The fix? Dealer service departments will be asked to remove said spark plug wire retention channel from the front of the engine bay, and then retrofit two new retainers."
http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/13/gm-to...

chainsawchuckie
Apr 13, 2009 at 7:19 p.m.
Suggest removal

now we know where some of that bail out money is going to go.

BostonBill
Apr 13, 2009 at 7:09 p.m.
Suggest removal

Let's see:
"no reports of any fires or injuries"
- Okay. That's good.
" it was a precautionary measure for consumers"
- Then why did it take up to TWELVE YEARS? lol

Synergy08
Apr 13, 2009 at 7:08 p.m.
Suggest removal

i have a 00 grand prix, guess i should get it up to rock county

transformer07
Apr 13, 2009 at 6:53 p.m.
Suggest removal

Looks like getting a new engine or car.

Gladiatorfootball12
Apr 13, 2009 at 6:38 p.m.
Suggest removal

Doesn't really state which part is being recalled....

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT