Someone's skirt is showing.
Just what could possibly be the point of noting that Van Hollen is the co-chair of the McCain election campaign in Wisconsin other than the vote fraud abatement laws he's trying to force the state to follow could erase a political advantage for Democrats? I guess you have to expect a donkey to complain while it’s being gelded.
It may be true that there is no evidence of wide spread voter fraud. That’s especially true when you don’t look for any. There is, however, evidence of “isolated” voter fraud, but, apparently some think that, like boys, politicians will be politicians, those imps.
Just what should Van Hollen be investigated for, a conflict of interest with Democrats? Lock up the bum!

Sure, he didn't. We have another Katherine Harris on our hands here.

I have no problem with proving who I am before I vote, especially if I just moved here from, oh I don't know, Arizona, or California, or Texas, or New Mexico....or any other state.

There has been actual, widespread, proven, criminal voting fraud?
.
Yes, there have been a few people who scammed registrations for commissions, but they were *turned in*. I'm talking about people who actually voted fraudulently. How often does that happen? In other words, is this a problem anyone should be concerned about, or is it just another way to keep participation down?

Whoops! JimB, you're correct. It's the Government Accoutability Board. And it ought to investigate Van Hollen.

Its probably just coincidence that no one in the Democratic Party ever wants to clean up voter fraud in Wisconsin because they are the ones who benefit most from it. They block every attempt to straighten this mess out. What is wrong with accurate voter records and identification at the polls. A lawsuit is proper.

Then it's probably just coincidence that John McCain's campaign co-chair (van Hollen) filed suit against the GAB which has the authority to administer election law in Wisconsin after they determined that Federal Law was being met.

It's probably a coincidence that van Hollen keeps parroting a roundly disproven WisGOP memo from 2006 that even Karl Rove has backed away from and the US Attorney in Milwaukee called meritless.

It's probably a coincidence that van Hollen's own department told him that it would be a conflict of interest for the Department of Justice to sue the GAB while it was already defending them in two other cases but van Hollen decided to bull through anyway in defiance of Ethics Regulations.

It's probably just coincidence that van Hollen is co-chair of a campaign that is soliciting absentee ballots for districts other than the voters home. Should our Attorney General be a party to soliciting vote fraud?

Too many coincidences for my taste.

The Attorney General files suit against the state elections board. Just coincidentally, he is the co-chair of the McCain election campaign in Wisconsin.
Can you say conflict of interest?