ADVERTISEMENT

Supervisor wants criminal probe into Gableman ad

By ASSOCIATED PRESS   Monday, October 20, 2008 - 10:54 a.m.
ADVERTISEMENT

MADISON, Wis. (AP) A county supervisor is asking for an investigation into whether Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman committed a crime when he ran a misleading campaign ad.

The Judicial Commission alleges Gableman committed misconduct by falsely suggesting Justice Louis Butler freed a child molester who later raped again in a television ad.

Now Milwaukee County Supervisor John Weishan Jr. wants to know whether Gableman's conduct violated a state law that prohibits anyone from knowingly making "a false representation pertaining to a candidate."

That law punishes violators with up to six months in jail but it does not appear to have been enforced in recent years.

Gableman's consultant has argued the ad's language was factual and the complaint is a violation of his free speech.




reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(3)
RetiredAirForce
Oct 20, 2008 at 6:38 p.m.
Suggest removal

Leave it up to politicians..the only ads not required to meet the truth in advertising law are political ads. It is time for term limits to get rid of the problem.

billnewbie
Oct 20, 2008 at 6:03 p.m.
Suggest removal

This Milwaukee County supervisor may be on to something here. If we can investigate and then convict anyone who has made a false statement about a candidate, we can throw a lot of the bums out of office and bring in some fresh minds to government.
Wait a minute. This law doesn't limit itself to just other candidates lying about opponents. It seems to apply to anyone who may lie about a candidate. Hmmm. I wonder if this law was an incumbent protection device. Incumbents have a record to "lie" about while it's more difficult to "lie" about challengers.
If they start enforcing this law in earnest, were gonna need more prisons, ASAP.

Bubs
Oct 20, 2008 at 2:05 p.m.
Suggest removal

A complaint/request to uphold a law is not a violation of free speech. If Gableman and his consultant feel that their free speech is being violated, they should challenge the law.
I would hope that a justice obligated to uphold the law could withstand an investigation into a potential violation of a law and do so with a little decorum.
Based on the Judicial Commissions determination, it seems appropriate that an investigation follow.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT