It is easier to list those who would benefit from de-unionization, but here goes.
An employee would benefit from unionization when the union does not use antagonism as its primary method of dealing with the employer, when the union represents all members equally regardless of seniority status or whether or not a member is a member of the union leadership, when the union does not attempt to intimidate its own members, and when the leadership does not advance its own interests ahead of those of the membership. Then, when the basis of a union is built on respect, unionization could be very beneficial both to workers, and employers. I do not believe such a union exists, unfortunately, and that is why you find my comments about unions to be negative. Scab really is such a hateful term and it surprises me that you embrace it.
Let’s not forget that a Lt. Governor is first in line to succeed the Governor should he fail to complete his term for whatever reason. And even she recognized the inappropriateness of using that hateful term in public which she also privately embraces, apparently.

A Lt. Governor by any other name however, is still a wannabe.

A scab, by any other name , is still a scab.

billnewbie wrote;
"Many people who could benefit from unionization will not join one because of the attitude of unionists who throw around smug terms such as "scab"."
.
From reading some of your previous post's, I am surprised that you would think anyone could benefit from a union.
.
Who, in your opinion would benefit from unionization, and how?

Many unionists demonize anyone they view as an adversary, such as managers, strikebreakers, non-union employers such as wal-mart, foreign workers, and even people who buy some but not all of their goods from union made companies. Many people who could benefit from unionization will not join one because of the attitude of unionists who throw around smug terms such as "scab".

Often a so-called scab is just a person with a family to support who is trying to get by the best way he or she can. It is hard for an honest, working person to fault that.

put your big girl panties on and get over it

I love it when a company sticks it to the union. Lowly workers should only make $3.75 a hour!

I love it when a company sticks it to a union.

"Scabs" is what they are. period

Gee! I'm offended that the "replacement workers" are offended. I DEMAND a retraction by Lt. Gov. Lawton. Hmmm, I'm also offended by the high prices at the gas pump. I wonder if she'd do something about that!

She's one Obama appointment from being governor.

EXACTLY!! Now she has offended both sides. It's down right scary to think she's a heartbeat away from being governor.

Didn't her mother tell her not to pick on a scab?
http://www.instantrimshot.com/

Maybe if our Gov. and Lt. Gov have not screwed up this states economy so bad, there would not be so many people out of work having to become Temp's or replacement workers. They keep taking money away and taxing people and businesses it is hard to believe anyone can keep a business running

Now she has offended both sides!

Some people call a spade a spade - is that a bad thing?