ADVERTISEMENT

Ho-Chunk Nation owes nearly $100 million

By SHELLY BIRKELO ( Contact )   Tuesday, July 1, 2008 - 6:01 a.m.
ADVERTISEMENT

MADISON -- The state ended another fiscal year Monday without a payment for casino operations from the Ho-Chunk Nation, leading Wisconsin officials to say the tribe now owes close to $100 million.

The Ho-Chunk’s latest payment to the state was due Monday, but the tribe refused to pay, as it has in years past. The Ho-Chunk argue the value of the tribe’s 2003 casino agreement with the state was greatly diminished after the state Supreme Court ruled in 2004 that Gov. Jim Doyle didn’t have the authority to sign perpetual casino deals.

The tribe continues to offer expanded games such as poker and roulette that were agreed to in the 2003 compact, but it has stopped making the payments that were also required under that deal.

Doyle said the tribe owes the payments and that state officials will continue to pursue enforcement efforts in federal court -- the only recourse available to Wisconsin under federal Indian gaming laws.




reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(48)
whybesad
Aug 29, 2008 at 8:15 a.m.
Suggest removal

So what if they donate money!! I donate money and I still have to pay my taxes. Doesn't mean they shouldn't pay what they said they would play. Doyle is so deep in the Ho-chunks pockets that he wouldn't do anything to them if he wants any campaign money for his re-election bid.

Rain
Aug 12, 2008 at 1:43 p.m.
Suggest removal

Maybe people should get an understanding to history...the Ho-Chunk Nation is always donating money to surrounding communities as well as other charities...so if you all think that the money made from the businesses that the Ho-Chunk Nation own only goes back into the tribe do some research and realize that the tribe helps out whenever it is needed. Anytime there has been a disaster the Ho-Chunk Nation gave out money to help out. You dont want to go to the casino dont go, nobody is making you..go to Vegas.

608592
Jul 8, 2008 at 4:24 p.m.
Suggest removal

If the 2003 agreement is not valid, then anything agreed to in the agreement should also not be allowed. They should stop any illegal procedures or the fed. gov. should step in and take legal action that they have the right to do.

garyprimer
Jul 4, 2008 at 10:52 p.m.
Suggest removal

A similar situation in Florida, http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080703/ap_o...

whybesad
Jul 3, 2008 at 6:23 p.m.
Suggest removal

Doyle isn't going to bite the hand that feeds him. The indians haven't lived up to their end of the bargain. Pretty simple. Shut them down.

garyprimer
Jul 2, 2008 at 8:33 a.m.
Suggest removal

They can't have it both ways. If the compact is not legal, then it's terms are null and void. They are not binding on either side and gambling operations should return to the pre-compact regulations. Expanded game options never existed.

whybesad
Jul 2, 2008 at 7:23 a.m.
Suggest removal

Gambling is illegal in this State but, made legal under the compact and the agreement that the Ho-Chunk nation pay their fair share of taxes. They aren't living up to their end of the deal. So, they should be shut down. Any other business that doesn't pay their taxes doesn't get to operate like the Indians and just be able to continue to run their business. It's a pretty shallow move by the tribe while they are making money hand over fist presently illegally.

Devilsadvocate
Jul 2, 2008 at 12:55 a.m.
Suggest removal

No authority to shut them down. When the supreme court ruled Gov. Jim Doyle did not have the authority to sign perpetual casino deals, Ho Chunks attorneys properly concluded, then the contract isn't lawful, thus not binding on us, so we aren't living up to the terms of the contract, take us to court. Fairly straight forward contract law.

If you want to blame someone for the loss of money, you might start with the legislature and those who challenged the governors authority in court. They won and lost the state a bundle.

snarly
Jul 2, 2008 at 12:49 a.m.
Suggest removal

chad_vader I will agree with you on that just don't go and gamble their.

gazettefan
Jul 1, 2008 at 11:11 p.m.
Suggest removal

Yes.

No.

thekid3477
Jul 1, 2008 at 11:03 p.m.
Suggest removal

i may seem ignorant here but isnt gambling technically illegal??

gazettefan
Jul 1, 2008 at 11:02 p.m.
Suggest removal

Don't worry about the Indians: They got even with us with the casinos and turquois jewelry.

firecracker
Jul 1, 2008 at 9:56 p.m.
Suggest removal

But where else can I go to increase my risk of lung cancer and get run over by little old ladies on scooters?! And miss out on THAT kinda fun?!

gamblerone
Jul 1, 2008 at 4:45 p.m.
Suggest removal

Just boycot the Ho Chunk casino. Did they not have the National Guard there at one time to keep people out. Just go to any bar or bowling alley around Janesville and you can gamble all you want,and save gas money for the ride up there. They are really tight and don't pay, but neither does Ho Chunk

shagcarpet
Jul 1, 2008 at 4:01 p.m.
Suggest removal

The original gaming compact in which they agreed to higher gaming taxes was overturned by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court ruled Doyle did not have the authority to sign the deal. Once they ruled this, the contract should have been voided and released everyone from their responsibilities.

rooster
Jul 1, 2008 at 3:45 p.m.
Suggest removal

schulers was irs business as usual. shutting down a business that was trying to pay them and was doing so in good faith, and putting hard working people out of work (and on welfare!) on the other hand, the casino is politics as usual. sounds arrogant of the tribe to do what they are doing, not just illegal.

chad_vader
Jul 1, 2008 at 3:43 p.m.
Suggest removal

Why do you think they called it Ho-Chunk. If you go there to gamble, they end up taking a ho' chunk of yo' money! Just stop going there people!

jade
Jul 1, 2008 at 3:29 p.m.
Suggest removal

Oh, no! They were only here first!

jvldss
Jul 1, 2008 at 3:12 p.m.
Suggest removal

Pretty soon the native Americans will have as many rights as the illegal aliens.

shagcarpet
Jul 1, 2008 at 2:12 p.m.
Suggest removal

I agree with armyof3. Finally the native americans are getting on on the white man. Hahaha.

w8nc
Jul 1, 2008 at 1:35 p.m.
Suggest removal

Doesn't the state regulate gaming? I'm pretty sure this is state regulated. Wisconsin has the right to allow or prohibit gambling. Why not implement stricter gambling laws. If you don't pay your taxes, why should you remain open and operating. Further more, if they don't want to pay taxes on the casinos they have, why are they thinking about building another casino??? I know. So they can make more money and not pay taxes on that.

armyof3
Jul 1, 2008 at 1:32 p.m.
Suggest removal

the money the tribe receives is federal, not state... just because they found a loophole in their agreement in '03 makes Doyle mad?? it was their land to begin with... why else would they had the Indian Removal Act of 1830?? it's federally protected land, not state...

jvldss
Jul 1, 2008 at 1:27 p.m.
Suggest removal

And yet Ho-Chunk can now sponsor Badger athletics (as well as the Packers) for hundreds of thousands of dollars to promote their ventures. Take it out of Doyle's salary if they "refuse" to pay.

snarly
Jul 1, 2008 at 11:55 a.m.
Suggest removal

just make it leagle to gamble in wisconsin and we would not have to woory about the tribe's money we all would have less tax's more money for school's more job's

farmdude
Jul 1, 2008 at 11:36 a.m.
Suggest removal

Why would Doyle close down one of his key contributors?

intheloop
Jul 1, 2008 at 11:05 a.m.
Suggest removal

What some are not realizing is that the land becomes Indian grounds and thus is protected federally. The state is very limited on what they can do and that is why they are unable to just go in and shut it down.

onelife2live
Jul 1, 2008 at 10:56 a.m.
Suggest removal

Just like they did to Schulers Furniture store.
Close it up.

snarly
Jul 1, 2008 at 10:41 a.m.
Suggest removal

just leaglise gambling for the state and have it like nevada so the state would have revinue and then we would not have to worry about ho chunk wake up people give it a thought.

deputydog
Jul 1, 2008 at 9:59 a.m.
Suggest removal

I agree with shutting down the roads, throw the barricades up.....

melstew47
Jul 1, 2008 at 9:46 a.m.
Suggest removal

the same laws that apply to us should apply to them.if it were my business or yours they would have already seized it.they should not be treated special and have their own laws.

JCK
Jul 1, 2008 at 9:33 a.m.
Suggest removal

Perhaps the road construction idea has it merits but what about all of the other businesses that it would impact. You can't shut down Hwy 12 and think the only business you are going to effect is the casino. Even by simply shutting down a section of it in front of the casino.

twistedstorm
Jul 1, 2008 at 8:58 a.m.
Suggest removal

eminent domain lets just take it

chainsawchuckie
Jul 1, 2008 at 8:54 a.m.
Suggest removal

i really do like the idea of tearing up the access roads and block them in!! that just might get their attention. i still smell a rat.

chelleandlou
Jul 1, 2008 at 8:34 a.m.
Suggest removal

Shut them down!

JCK
Jul 1, 2008 at 8:15 a.m.
Suggest removal

I particularly like the part of how they follow the parts of the 2003 agreement that allowed them to expand their gaming operations but reject the part that calls for them to pay for it.

janesvillecomments
Jul 1, 2008 at 7:54 a.m.
Suggest removal

Apparently either the Ho-Chunk Nation is yet another group to learn that Chief Doyle.... er, Governor Doyle speaks with forked tongue; or Doyle is learning that the Ho-Chunk lawyers were taught how to phrase their contracts by studying the Indian Removal Act of 1830: "for as long as the grass was green, as long as the waters flowed, and as long as the sky was blue"

Northman
Jul 1, 2008 at 7:50 a.m.
Suggest removal

I don’t think the state can do anything to the casinos per se; “the only recourse available to Wisconsin under federal Indian gaming laws”. But, Doyle could borrow a little something out of Mayor Daley’s playbook: in the dead of night, tear up the access roads, put up construction signs, park a couple bulldozers and graders in the middle of the mess, and let it all sit. With no customers and zero revenue the tribe might reconsider their position and settle up.

twistedstorm
Jul 1, 2008 at 7:16 a.m.
Suggest removal

Just do what they did to that furniture place raid the casinos and take them as possessions until payment is made.

WHATMEWORRY
Jul 1, 2008 at 7:09 a.m.
Suggest removal

Too bad for them. Pay up! Those Tv ads must have been too expensive. Maybe they can build a casino in Beloit to offset their loses ?

chainsawchuckie
Jul 1, 2008 at 6:26 a.m.
Suggest removal

now i know why i don't go there. Could never win anything. and it looks like they are not paying what they owe the state. hmmmmm. i smell a rat.

007
Jul 1, 2008 at 6:12 a.m.
Suggest removal

Lock the doors until payments are made, simple as that!

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT