ADVERTISEMENT

Public hearing on Rockport Pool

By MARCIA NELESEN ( Contact )   Friday, January 25, 2008 - 7:44 a.m.
ADVERTISEMENT

JANESVILLE The Janesville City Council will be asked to vote on the future of Rockport Pool on Monday, and City Manager Steve Sheiffer is recommending a new pool there at a cost of no more than $5 million.

Sheiffer calls his recommended option an upgrade, but the upgrade includes a new vessel with zero-depth entry.

A public hearing is scheduled, and the council is expected to vote Monday night.

Sheiffer outlined two options in a memo to the council:

Option No. 1—Upgrade Rockport Pool and repair and maintain the Palmer Park wading pool.

The city would borrow a maximum of $5 million for construction, and the upgrades would provide room for 800 swimmers. Besides the zero-depth entry, Rockport would have water slides, a new bathhouse and more parking. A lazy river could be added in the future. Sheiffer recommends creating a Rockport Pool Committee and hiring a consultant at a cost of $18,500.

The Palmer Park wading pool and Lions Beach would remain open.

Because of higher fees, annual revenue from Rockport Pool is projected to increase 400 percent to $196,000, reducing the annual subsidy to operate the facility.

The annual total impact—debt service, repairs, maintenance and operations subsidy—would be $13.05 a year for 20 years on a home assessed at $112,700.

Option No. 2—Spending $2.1 million over 20 years to repair and maintain Rockport Pool and the Palmer Park wading pool without upgrades or improvements.

This option wouldn’t have the annual expense of debt service, but because of lower revenue is projected to have an annual operations subsidy early four times higher than option No. 1.

The annual total impact—repairs, maintenance and operations subsidy—would be $10.74 a year for 20 years on a home assessed at $112,700.

Lions Beach would remain open.




reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(16)
unkbd
Jan 29, 2008 at 4:48 a.m.
Suggest removal

long time gone....you so-o-o called it. Mr. Sheiffer is retiring as of Sept. 2nd.

tnimmo
Jan 28, 2008 at 9:01 a.m.
Suggest removal

Wasted money wasted money. Does the city of JANESVILLE really need all of these pools and water parks and hoobha?! Honestly. If the city is so eager to throw money at something throw it at me, or at the delapitated riverside park, that actully has beauty value and potential.
By the way this is not Tom Nimmo! THANK GOD! :)

Long_Time_Gone
Jan 27, 2008 at 6:04 p.m.
Suggest removal

Reopen Riverside!! Clean and staff Lions Beach. With Palmer, Rockport and the YMCA, what more could a city the size of Janesville ask for?!?!
This city manager must be readying his retirement and sees the pool as some sort of legacy.

mrmeadec
Jan 27, 2008 at 1:17 p.m.
Suggest removal

I think they should put the money in rockport. Its old and needs to be updated. For my family its boring right now as it is. I would just use my pool in my back yard. If they do put in there 0 depth entrance with along the slides i would get the season pass!!!

oldtimer
Jan 26, 2008 at 7:35 a.m.
Suggest removal

I agree with bbwil, I dont see why Rockport pool needs 5 million to fix it. Our city manager is so stubborn it has to be his way or none, lets upgrade the wading pool at Riverside Park and get some families there for pinics etc. I love that park.

unkbd
Jan 26, 2008 at 12:58 a.m.
Suggest removal

What is it with Mr. Sheiffer and Aquatics. First it was the new aquatics facility at a cost of $5 Million or more, now it is Rockport pool and Palmer park wading pool. It seems that he is just aching to spend $5 Million on something. My question is why?

I also have to wonder why a facility that is only used by 15% of the population for only 78 days of the year is the target for this $5 Million expenditure. If the money absolutely has to be spent, find something that a majority of the population uses or don't spend it at all. My taxes went up again this year and I don't relish the thought of them going up again next year due to Mr. Sheiffers desire to spend this money (even if it is only $10). Besides, if Rockport pool and Palmer pool had been taken care of properly over the years I can't believe that the repairs would be in excess of a few hundred thousand for both. There is something fishy going on here, and I don't think it has anything to do with the "quality of life" issue that Mr. Sheiffer claims. Sorry for the rant.

bbwil
Jan 25, 2008 at 8:15 p.m.
Suggest removal

Those of you talking about the YMCA being "old and basic," have you not seen all of the updates they have made very recently? I'm guessing you haven't heard of or seen the new aquatic center.

Anyway, I'm wondering what is wrong with Rockport pool that needs 5 million dollars worth of fixing?

wtp
Jan 25, 2008 at 6:33 p.m.
Suggest removal

Five million dollars is a lot of money for 3 months of use. Yet a sport that thousands of kids do every day, the city totally ignores them. I am taking about all the kids that are on skate boards. This sport is the fastest growing sport in the nation and is played widely 12 months of the year. I feel if the city wants to spend money lets spend it wisely on some thing that will get some use out of it year around. Cities all around us have put in skate parks. Example Beloit, Whitewater, Delavan, Loves Park, Middleton just to name a few. These cities saw a need for this sport and did something about it. $250,000. would build a very nice park for Janesville. I am sure the skate park committee will be able to come with the rest if needed. Lets encourage our city fathers not to look the other way when they see a kid on the skate board doing damage to your property because he or she has no place to go. It is so easy to call the police and make a complaint against the skater but will not give them a place to skate safely.

qschrader
Jan 25, 2008 at 6 p.m.
Suggest removal

MYTAKE4U if you are so confident that thier is a market for this in Janesville why don't you raise the capital to do it and start your own sprts center as a for profit business?

wisconsinheat
Jan 25, 2008 at 4:33 p.m.
Suggest removal

If "the revenue will be there," don't you think a private venture would have already capitalized on it?

Keep taxes out of it.

mytake4u
Jan 25, 2008 at 4:23 p.m.
Suggest removal

spot on cap! janesville could use something like that. i had suggested a sports center. we missed the big opportunity for one sports/entertainment venue last year because of perinoia that someone might make a buck or 2. come on janesville, we can do it. the revenue will be there. build it and they will come.

seabass1213
Jan 25, 2008 at 2:56 p.m.
Suggest removal

It's to bad the city will not improve the water quality at lions beach, the most they would have to do is cut the weed bed in Atlas Pit and clear any blockage in the stream beds to get the water flowing better and maybe the fishing would be improved.

Acer
Jan 25, 2008 at 1:21 p.m.
Suggest removal

I see that option one includes a "zero-depth entry." Does this mean another lap pool in Janesville will be lost?

liberte
Jan 25, 2008 at 11:16 a.m.
Suggest removal

I would feel much better if the city borrowed 5 million dollars, charging me 15 bucks a year, to provide education scholarships, and counseling to motivated individuals that couldn't otherwise afford an education. That money would be repaid in so many ways, like increased tax base, more community-minded individuals wanting to give back what they've gotten, less crime, and generally happier people.

cap
Jan 25, 2008 at 10:38 a.m.
Suggest removal

Having lived in other states it seems to me that perhaps instead of putting all the money into upgrades to existing outside pool perhaps they should look into a recreation center that has pool, slides, raquetball, etc activities that can be used year round. Sometimes it is too sunny or rainy to go outside. YMCA is old and basic. Rec centers are usually new and modern and kids love them. A pool that can be used just in summertime for all that money seems to be a waste.

irishbychoice
Jan 25, 2008 at 8:34 a.m.
Suggest removal

Thank goodness the city has come to its senses. Destroying Palmer Park for a 78-day-per-year waterpark facility was an asinine idea at best. Upgrade Rockport, maintain Palmer Park wading pool, and re-open the wading pool at Riverside. Charge higher admission for non-Janesville residents!

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT