Mother in drug death wants Len Bias law revised
OSHKOSH, Wis. (AP) — The mother of man who died of a drug overdose in Winnebago County wants the state’s Len Bias law to include all drugs that take a person’s life.
The Len Bias law allows prosecutors to file a reckless homicide charge against anyone who sells or distributes a schedule I or II drug to a person who later dies. Len Bias was a former Maryland basketball star who died of a cocaine overdose in 1986.
Debra Hensch says the drug that killed her 35-year-old son a year ago was Suboxone, a schedule III drug. As a result, the man who delivered it can’t be charged with reckless homicide.
The state’s controlled substances board determines what drugs fall under what categories with the help of findings released by the federal government.

Aug 27, 2008 at 10 p.m.
Suggest removal
Yes, this is a horrible situation. HOWEVER, optimism and jviers77, you make excellent points. Unfortunately in today's society the teachings are that we don't have to be accountable for our own actions, and we can all be victims. I'm sorry this woman lost her son and I'm sorry he made poor choices. And I think it's great that there's motivation to "get tough" on illegal drug use. Nonetheless, one can't lose sight that the poor choices made by her adult son cost him his life, in this instance.
Aug 26, 2008 at 6:28 p.m.
Suggest removal
This is just like the recent tragedy in Edgerton. The family couldn't except the fact that the man had mental issues, and chose to blame the police and crisis center. This will forever be the way things are being it is too hard to except your own son..daughter..wife..etc, could actually be less than perfect.
Aug 26, 2008 at 4:19 p.m.
Suggest removal
At some point, personal responsibility has to come into play. If the dealer who sold the drugs hadn't sold them to her son, he would've gotten them somewhere else. Her son chose to use drugs and died as a direct result of it. It's a sad and all too common story, but it was his choice. Everytime tragedy happens, people look for others to blame. Sometimes, people just make bad choices. There can't always be a scapegoat.
Aug 26, 2008 at 3:52 p.m.
Suggest removal
mymaro....Bingo!
Aug 26, 2008 at 3:51 p.m.
Suggest removal
Nutty...I totally agree. It seems everyone wants this to be a NO FAULT country. It really is getting sickening. I agree that a person loses their identity when they become an addict, but that still doesn't put other people at fault for their behavoir. Sure, let's stick with the selling drugs without a drug stamp punishment, but murder...nah!
Aug 26, 2008 at 3:34 p.m.
Suggest removal
Just wondering...how do you die from Suboxone? Unless you shoot it or use it with drugs that it has interactions with it then it is not supposed to be fatal... So if he chose to take other things with it or misused a drug that helps a lot of people then why is it someone elses fault??
Aug 26, 2008 at 1:04 p.m.
Suggest removal
A few years ago none of us would have suspected that spray paint would have been used as a drug to get high off of. (intentionally anyway) A druggie will always find something to get high from. And a lot of times the things they find leave us all saying "huh?".
Aug 26, 2008 at 12:56 p.m.
Suggest removal
Being single-minded and overbearing again kid? A woman's son has died because a pusher sold him a schedule III drug that can't be prosecuted under this law and all you want to write is that it wasn't marijuana so it should be legal. That's not the way to win friends and influence people.
Aug 26, 2008 at 12:51 p.m.
Suggest removal
Suboxone is given to poeple with herion addiction. It is to control the bodys craving for the drug. I dont know what kind of high you get off of it if your not using it for the purpose of supressing the craving for herion.
Aug 26, 2008 at 12:24 p.m.
Suggest removal
THis is so hard to take sides on. Yes, I believe that a person who supplies the drug(s) that kills a person should be held accountable as an accessory to the crime, but then on the other hand, if there was no demand, there would be no supply. Unless one wants to help themselves, then there is no way to stop druggies from being druggies, and they will take anything for that high. I can see it now, sometime in the future (if not tried already) someone is going to try prosecuting an alcohol company because they supplied the beer/cocktail that their loved one drank too much of and died of a pickled liver. This to me is just another example of people refusing to see the person who did the drug responsible. It is alwasy someone else's fault.
Aug 26, 2008 at 11:08 a.m.
Suggest removal
marijuana is a schedule I narcotic which means by definition it 'has a high risk of abuse and no known medical use' yet this Suboxone is a schedule III narcotic which means it has 'potential for abuse less than schedule I and II....and currenty accepted medical use'. more people have died from Suboxone in this story alone than have EVER died from the direct use of marijuana.
Aug 26, 2008 at 10:48 a.m.
Suggest removal
We can try to prevent people from causing harm to others, but you can't save people from themselves, unfortunately.
Aug 26, 2008 at 10:32 a.m.
Suggest removal
If someone causes the death of anyone no matter what the means, yes they should be held responsible.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.