Two injured in I-90 crash at Beloit
BELOIT — Two Milwaukee residents were injured in a one car roll-over accident on I-90 at Beloit late Wednesday night.
The State Patrol, Beloit police and Beloit paramedics responded to the north bound lane near the tourist information center around eleven o'clock.
Reports indicate the car was southbound and drifted into the median where it rolled several times.
A 37 year old female passenger was flown to Rockford Memorial hospital, while the 47 year old male driver was taken to Beloit Memorial hospital. The extent of injuries is unknown.
Alcohol was a factor in the crash, which remains under investigation. Northbound traffic was restricted to one lane for about an hour after the accident.

Apr 18, 2008 at 2:44 p.m.
Suggest removal
Interesting read...http://www.nida.nih.gov/NIDA_Notes/NNVol11N1/Marijuana.html
Apr 18, 2008 at 12:21 a.m.
Suggest removal
WOW.. you sure know how to evade the questions.
Come on, you're really a politician aren't you?
Apr 18, 2008 at 12:09 a.m.
Suggest removal
:)
Apr 18, 2008 at 12:03 a.m.
Suggest removal
Two important facts about alcohol:
1. This country tried to outlaw it's production and consumption. It failed miserably then and it would if tried again.
2. This country woefully underpunishes for repeat offenses of drunk driving. Not only should the offenders be dosed with Antabuse after conviction, I'm starting to think some sitting judges should be given a dose before they enter the courtroom in the morning!
Apr 18, 2008 at 12:01 a.m.
Suggest removal
When you say "Actually it's state law: 346.71(2)" and cite WISCONSIN State Statutes, I would say YES you are referring to WISCONSIN law. And by inference Wisconsin departments. Not Mississippi. Not Illinois. Not whatever else you want to Google.
Time to give it up.
Take up swimming.
You're doing the backstroke.
Apr 17, 2008 at 11:55 p.m.
Suggest removal
officerfriendly...I sincerely hope you are only a "wannabe" and not a real cop.
.
Again, we're in WISCONSIN, not Illinois.
.
Those who understand Wisconsin law, express it.
Those who don't, GOOGLE it.....
Apr 17, 2008 at 11:34 p.m.
Suggest removal
Officer....Two issues here...Number 1,we're in WISCONSIN, not Mississippi....
.
Number 2...refer to my last post...#2..INJURY, not death....again....PROBABLE CAUSE?
Apr 17, 2008 at 11 p.m.
Suggest removal
Officer....Two issues here. Number 1, if they are deceased, they wouldn't "appear perfectly normal." In the case of the deceased, "impairment" wouldn't even be an issue. Nor would "department policy."
.
Number 2, you referenced "injury" accident and "department policy" in the same sentence as "appear perfectly normal."
One could conclude by that statement that you were referring to the SURVIVING driver involved. Thus, probable cause would be required for any blood draw.
Please correct me if I am mistaken.
Apr 17, 2008 at 8:54 p.m.
Suggest removal
officerfriendly1...."At an injury or fatal accident the drivers blood is tested if there is any sign of impairment and sometimes even when they appear perfectly normal depending on the law enforcement agency's department policy."
.
Please let us know which departments you are referring to that ignore "probable cause" and require a blood draw of someone who appears "perfectly normal."
Apr 17, 2008 at 8:11 p.m.
Suggest removal
Come on, everybody knows that far fewer drivers in accidents are tested for marijuana consumption even though quite a few of them have been using the substance. I ran drug treatment outpatient groups in Madison and had quite a few drivers in there that did not drink alcohol but were picked up for their driving under the influence of marijuana. Only once in my life (as a teen-ager) did I ever drive after using marijuana. I came to a stop at a stop sign and literally watched the darn sign go from right in front of my car to its real position more than a block away. So, don't tell me that marijuana does not affect one's driving ability. By the way, it was the final time I ever smoked the crap (excuse my language please).
Apr 17, 2008 at 3:19 p.m.
Suggest removal
officerfriendly yer my new BFF:)
Apr 17, 2008 at 1:43 p.m.
Suggest removal
Maybe he was stoned and had a few beers to wash away the cotton mouth.
Apr 17, 2008 at 11:30 a.m.
Suggest removal
good question officerfriendly. actually NO ONE has ever died from the direct use of marijuana. EVER. if you search marijuana on the gazette there was like 87 hits(no pun intended;) i didnt read the articles, most were the public records and they were all about marijuana possession or intent to deliver. BOTH OF WHICH WOULD NOT BE CRIMES IF UNCLE SAM REGULATED LIKE ALCOHOL. jail overcrowding anyone?? there was also the story of the 16yr old who killed that guy on the road, she admitted to smoking pot, but any sane logical reasonable person HAS to hold alcohol AT LEAST half accountable for that tragedy, plus she said she smoked it 10 hours earlier. another story i read was about a young man getting expelled for simple marijauna possession on school grounds. im ok with that, i dont promote cannabis OR alcohol use by teens. but i do wonder if this kid woulda been expelled if he was in possession of a 12 pack?? ignorance and hypocrisy people. im not the criminal.
Apr 17, 2008 at 9:35 a.m.
Suggest removal
alcohol was a factor?? id have never guessed. keep yo head up yo keester uncle sam and tell em all how alcohol is ok when used by responsible adults but if you touch pot youll be come a lazy 'druggie' with no ambition in life. seems to be working now....
Apr 17, 2008 at 8:48 a.m.
Suggest removal
When will people realize that alcohol and a moving vehicle is NEVER a good idea.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.