Big news in Sawyer County cranberry suit.

By Ann Marie Ames ( Contact )   May 16, 2008 - 9:38 a.m.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court on Tuesday refused to hear a nuisance lawsuit filed against a Sawyer County cranberry farm.

That's big news for those supporting Wisconsin farmers' right to legal farm practices.

Here's a press release from the Wisconsin Farm Bureau.

Have a good weekend, everybody!


The Wisconsin Farm Bureau Federation was extremely pleased to learn that the Wisconsin Supreme Court has refused to review a nuisance lawsuit filed against a Sawyer County cranberry grower by his out-of-state neighbors.

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court officially denied the plaintiffs’ petition for review of the nuisance lawsuit they first filed in 2004 with the support of former Attorney General Peg Lautenschlager. The plaintiffs had hoped the Supreme Court would hear the case after the Court of Appeals in February unanimously upheld an earlier circuit court’s ruling in favor of William Zawistowski.

The case will now be sent back to Sawyer County Circuit Court so that the trial judge can award Zawistowski and his insurance company, Rural Mutual Insurance Company, their attorneys' fees and court costs incurred in defending against the plaintiffs' unsuccessful nuisance as a legal right afforded to Wisconsin farmers under the Right to Farm Law.

Due to the lawsuit’s potential ramifications to the state’s Right to Farm Law, as well as the threat of future nuisance lawsuits against lawful farming practices, the Farm Bureau and a coalition of agriculture groups also filed a brief urging the high court not to hear the case.

“This case has historic implications to all of Wisconsin’s diverse $51 billion agriculture industry, and I am very proud that the Farm Bureau, other ag organizations and Rural Mutual Insurance Company have stood behind the Zawistowski cranberry operation throughout this case,” said WFBF President Bill Bruins. “We have never wavered from our commitment to protecting all Wisconsin farmers from nuisance lawsuits and preserving their right to farm.”

reader COMMENTS (1)
farmdude
May 20, 2008 at noon
Suggest removal

This case had big implications for ALL Wisconsin agriculture. Kudos to the Farm Bureau and Rural Mutual Insurance for standing beside the cranberry grower throughout this long ordeal.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT