ADVERTISEMENT
Comments posted by partarican1

On Milton Township quarry plan faces opposition, zoning hurdles

Posted on February 12 at 4:26 p.m. ( Suggest removal )

so this company needs an end point-in-time for their operation (I suspect frac sand mining is on the table after the hwy 26 project ends-and not part of the deal at this time), a bond to secure for remediation, and a public hearing after they submit their plans...lets face it, conditional use means the town can put conditions on land use....see you at the meeting tomorrow!


On White House: ’Absolutely firm,’ but willing to talk, on birth control

Posted on February 8 at 11:36 p.m. ( Suggest removal )

this is not about religion, but about access to contraception...and witaxman, there is no constitutional guarantee of separation of church and state...review 1st amendment here

http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/First_ame...


On Gravel quarry plan generates controversy

Posted on February 8 at 7:46 p.m. ( Suggest removal )

Sigma40_scraping the soil aside and placing it on top of bedrock is not the same as having soil on top of sand and gravel...there will be no soil profile, and most any fertilizer or pesticide will cause major problems in the watershed...


On White House: ’Absolutely firm,’ but willing to talk, on birth control

Posted on February 8 at 7:42 p.m. ( Suggest removal )

this isn't the dark ages, and if women want to have access to birth control it should be their right to choose to or not to use it...maybe it's time for certain christian groups to talk about how the population is OUT OF CONTROL and how we need to do something about it right here in America...this is ridiculous...


On Gravel quarry plan generates controversy

Posted on January 31 at 10:54 a.m. ( Suggest removal )

I want to see the plan for how they will turn a pit back into farmland...


On Gravel quarry plan generates controversy

Posted on January 31 at 9:47 a.m. ( Suggest removal )

wow, neighbors! glad to see you've done your homework on this :)
bebe53-no one insulted you, so what's the deal? of course we need jobs, but why should regulations be overlooked? this company did not promise jobs anywhere in the article...this company does not have a contract with the highway project, and it wants the town to overlook zoning ordinances to move forward with the project...sounds like the new mining legislation at the local level...nowhere does it state in the article that it will bring jobs to the area...this project will go on with or without this company setting up shop on Klug Road...
My husband and I monitor Otter Creek at Klug Road just north of Camp Waconda; if this project goes through we will be able to measure any difference in water quality, and for the record, I am against this gravel mine...


On Gravel quarry plan generates controversy

Posted on January 30 at 9:07 p.m. ( Suggest removal )

not sure how any mining company can return great farmland to great farmland when they remove the great farmland to get at the sand & gravel...


On Is McDonald eligible for judgeship?

Posted on January 28 at 11:49 a.m. ( Suggest removal )

sounds to me like the Gazette is paying more attention to McDonald and largely ignoring all other candidates to the point of exclusion...where are the articles about the other candidates? why is there focus on just one candidate?


On Liquor issue splits Janesville City Council

Posted on January 25 at 5:25 p.m. ( Suggest removal )

omg...are there really that many people who need beer that early or late? did someone complain?


On Gov. Walker to deliver speech amid recall turmoil

Posted on January 25 at 5:24 p.m. ( Suggest removal )

this should be good....


Page 1 of 89 | Next

ADVERTISEMENT