On Weiner: Avoid 'rush to judgment' on Braun
Posted on December 13 at 4:17 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Im not passing judgement, just some information I heard from an expert. Ingested drugs will not elevate his testosterone for a long period, so taking cold medicine wouldn't cause his level. The testing group (apparently) verifies all results to rule out false positives. One interesting item is that there is no denial from the Braun camp, just "highly unusual circumstances." (??? did he fall on a needle????) I will with hold judgement until the facts, I hope he is cleared.
On School board makes another appeal to unions
Posted on December 6 at 7:56 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
I understand many of you do want to lower your income to help the teachers maintain theirs. Well, can you blame the teacher for not wanting to lower their income to help you maintain yours? I can honestly say I would not be willing to give-up my income.
On Janesville City Council president resigns
Posted on November 9 at 3:43 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
taxandspend...if your referring to battery to a police officer statute 940.19 (battery) requires "bodily harm" the officer reports he was not injured. Please specify the felony your referring to.
On Brunner undecided on Janesville City Council position
Posted on November 9 at 7:36 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Look at the felony statute...no injury to the officer....it doesn't fit. That being said, George where were the apologies in your statement? Be gone.
On Lawmakers revisit concealed carry training
Posted on November 7 at 4:37 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
But don't you see, thats the problem. The law was too vague without giving DOJ any idea what they wanted the requirement to be so DOJ came up with one. Next time they could put a little more thought into what exactly they want in a law. The legislatures just said they needed training, without clarifying.
On Lawmakers revisit concealed carry training
Posted on November 7 at 12:07 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Hunters safety doesnt teach you about when deadly force is justified, and what to do during and after a deadly force encounter.
On Investigation shows Milton dog was intentionally hit
Posted on October 21 at 9:31 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Whats with the talk about charging the city employee? If this dog were being walked down the street by its owner and the city worker (for no reason) intentionally struck the dog, then yes charge him. It seems to me that those involved were trying to solve a problem (that was given to them), they may not have used the best method, but they had good intentions. No one started their day saying "I think Ill kill a dog today". They were faced with a rapidly developing situation and made a quick call, Im glad we are able to have hours, days and weeks to tell them how it could have been handled better.
On Appeals court dismisses Elkhorn woman's lawsuit against Yahoo
Posted on October 6 at 3:36 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
On Janesville police investigating string of strong-armed robberies
Posted on September 13 at 7:26 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Glock21sf "no one has even known the law existed until the paper did an article on it". Your kind of right, but there is no law that allows open carry period. We only have laws that restrict gun carry, none that allow it. So because we have no law that prohibits the open carry of a firearm, by default its legal.
Page 1 of 15 | Next
On Department of Justice rushes to meet concealed-carry deadlines
Posted on December 19 at 5:24 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Janesvillecomments....Im not opposed to your posts other than the comments about Van Hollen. Legislatures gave NO guidelines as to what the training should be so he had to come up with one, when he did they didnt like it. Its cleared up now but they should have put the specific training requirements in the law....they didnt.