ADVERTISEMENT
Comments posted by mcs

On Man sought reconciliation before shooting

Posted on July 2 at 7:47 p.m. ( Suggest removal )

Purrmaid......I agree with your statement 100%,except the part about how can men do this. Let's not be sexist. Women can and do fill this bill quite often. Perhaps the facts change a little but women are more than capable of placing their children in harms way.


On Man fatally shot after police chase

Posted on July 1 at 2:54 p.m. ( Suggest removal )

mymaro.......case solved,nutty took your twinkies.....he must be one of your homeys. You both talk like your incapable of making a rationally educated contribution based on the facts as presented by this article.


On Accident backing up I-90/39

Posted on June 28 at 9:27 a.m. ( Suggest removal )

gwendt...What do you want, big brother to hold your hand all the time...look outside..when the weather conditions create a hazard beyond your driving ability...park the car !!!!!!


On Committee will keep talking about new site for 4-H fair

Posted on June 26 at 3:16 p.m. ( Suggest removal )

Unfortunate growth requires funding for infrastructure and right now funding is one huge gray bit........leave well enough alone!!!!!


On Police: 150-pound cougar shot dead on Chicago's North Side

Posted on April 15 at 11:01 p.m. ( Suggest removal )

Come on now,lets not get to upset over these comments. They're just complaining to stir the pot a little. No one with any common sense would believe that the officers had any option other that to shoot the big cat. Miltonalum says that they tranquilize bears all the time and all they had to do is wait 15 minutes for chicago animal control...LOL./Have you every seen a bear on a full out run vs a cougar. Tortoise and the hare comes to mind. 15 minutes for animal control at at 5:30pm monday night with rush hour. What planet do you live on..this isn't milton were talking about.


On Packers 2008 schedule

Posted on April 15 at 10:39 p.m. ( Suggest removal )

saywhat....Yes you will be able to see every Packers loss. Odds say that there will be a couple ,even with most of the best teams there are. What is really sad and somewhat lonely is that that you need to watch a team that you apparently don't like just to see a loss. I'm sure no one pays you any mind anyway because you obviously have your priorities screwed up.


On Employee stops thief, but gets fired

Posted on April 8 at 9:25 p.m. ( Suggest removal )

kivsquest...I'm sorry to say that it is you that does not make much sense. What Babcock did was fail to follow store policy. At no time ,according to the article that I read,was he accused of lying,trying to cover up what he did or ask anyone to lie for him . Nothing in the article indicates that what he did rises to the level of misconduct. He did fail to follow store policy and that was why he was fired,plain and simple.He was not looking for 15 minutes of fame as what you accused him of. He was only taking an action that any reasonable and prudent person in his position would and should do.
I think you should practice what you write and "please, stop and think before you post these hurtful unruly comments."


On Employee stops thief, but gets fired

Posted on April 8 at 2:22 p.m. ( Suggest removal )

kivsquest....you made both of these statements. Perhaps I missed somthing,but where does it say he was fired for lying.. "It is unfortunate that Dean was fired but, as stated, it was due to lying not helping the 16-year old" "People please, stop and think before you post these hurtful unruly comments."


On Employee stops thief, but gets fired

Posted on April 8 at 2:08 p.m. ( Suggest removal )

Concealment is probable cause to detain and arrest for shoplifting. The policy of the local City and District Attorney's is to make detention and arrest past the last area of payment and preferably outside the store. This makes their chances of convention much greater.
As far as the article ,the security guard did the appropriate thing . It may have been against Target's policy but in reality he was protecting Target from civil liabilities. If the 16yr old girl were let go and information were to surface that it was done with Target personnel's knowledge they would be liable in the event of an accident.


On Employee stops thief, but gets fired

Posted on April 6 at 3:30 p.m. ( Suggest removal )

I believe that everyone is missing the larger picture. The mega stores of the world are realizing that it is much cheaper to passively allow shoplifting and pass the cost onto the honest shoppers than to fight lawyers and civil courts. Enjoy your shopping at Target knowing that you are paying for Suzy and her drinking habit and the other shoplifters. I don't shop at Target for this reason and many others, including their position on our troops in Iraq.


Page 1 of 8 | Next

ADVERTISEMENT