On Janesville ice arena advocates ask for different location
Youre a very selfish, self centered person. You think giving $2.5 million tax payer dollars to some unnecessary ice arena makes sense when our school system doesnt have enough money? How sad.
Let me take a wild, completely off the wall, guess here(sarcasm). J.P. Cullen, and Rock Road will get the contracts for this and make big bucks.
Heres a story currently on this site- http://www.gazettextra.com/news/2010/jan...
What is wrong with this picture? The city council is willing to give 2.5 million bucks for this TOTALLY unnecessary ice arena. Meanwhile, the SCHOOLS have a budget shortfall and have to hire a FUNDRAISER? Un-fricking-believable!
On Private donations for public schools suggested
Unbelievable, the city council wants to spend 2.5 million dollars on a unnecessary ice rink, meanwhile the schools have to hire a fundraiser for budget shortfalls? ARE YOU SERIOUS? whats wrong with this picture
My definition of a select few is the number of people that actually use the ice arena. WHich is a VERY small percentage of the city population. Are you trying to say that the ice arena is immensely popular and more than a small percentage of the population utilizes it? If that is the case why dont you answer my question, if the ice rink is so popular and such a money maker, why are they having a problem raising their own money?
2.5 million dollars in taxpayer money is 2.5 million TO MUCH! With the exception of a select few people in this city, nobody gives a rats rear end about an ice rink. If it was such a profitable, used by the masses, establishment then why are they begging for money and a location to build it? If they want it let them come up with the funds. Oh wait, they cant! Why is that? Maybe because theres not enough interest?
On Teen sentenced for fatal accident
oops, same quote two posts in a row, my fault.
"but incontruth who said pot wasn't even a factor has no idea if it was or not... " Again, do YOU know that it was? Nope, but you sure seem to think that your assumption is more valid than anyone elses. As far as SarahB1, is that any of your business? Seems Ive seen you calling out thekid when he hasnt posted on previous threads. Again, your hypocrisy shines through.
justaguy, do you recall this from your first post-"this is a victimless crime, pot only has a good side"...? Maybe youre the one who should "shut up". You also state "You have no idea if this guy still wasn't stoned" and " but incontruth who said pot wasn't even a factor has no idea if it was or not... ". Do YOU know that he WAS stoned? No, so how can you ridicule inconvienienttruth? Oh I know, because youre a hypocrite and you are just here to blab your anti marijuana agenda.
On Government files anti-trust suit against Dean Foods
Youre comparing apples to oranges. Driving the competition out of business is WAY different than purchasing your competition to eliminate them.
Page 1 of 26
» More most emailed stories
» More popular discussions
Staff Directory |
Contact Us |
Legal Notices |
Subscriber Services |
Site Help |
Site Map |
Latest News |
Public Record |
Special Sections |
Political Cartoons |
Photo Galleries |
Slide Shows |
Blog List |
Latest Blog Entries
Customer Care |
Newspaper In Education |
Reader Rewards |