On Rec director violated city policy: Attorney

Posted on January 21 at 9:30 a.m. ( Suggest removal )

PS....7 & 8 but this is a forum for comments isn't it...oh wait, now I have a vendetta against yada. Have a good day...

On Rec director violated city policy: Attorney

Posted on January 21 at 9:27 a.m. ( Suggest removal )

"Regarding the SIX comments by JVLWKR - you sound like you have a personal vendetta against Davis. You have over half of the comments that have been listed so far." from yada. In actuality 1 of my comments was a duplicate and 1 was an apology. And even if you count 6, it's not half of 14. As for a vendetta, BD has not done anything to me personally but I have experience watching what she has done to others.
A lot of good people have lost their jobs because of her.

On Rec director violated city policy: Attorney

Posted on January 20 at 1:06 p.m. ( Suggest removal )

My bad, it wasn't removed but took a few minutes to get posted.....sorry about that.

On Rec director violated city policy: Attorney

Posted on January 20 at 1:04 p.m. ( Suggest removal )

Since my last post was removed, let me change the way I wanted to get my point across. I have read Eric Levitt's Management Philosophy and Expectations and have my doubts as to how many of them certain people that work for the city actually meet. Is this soft enough?

On Rec director violated city policy: Attorney

Posted on January 20 at 1 p.m. ( Suggest removal )

I just read this

"Eric Levitt's Management Philosophy and Expectations"

From what I can see, B Davis meets 1 out of 7 and that one is questionable.

On Rec director violated city policy: Attorney

Posted on January 20 at 12:54 p.m. ( Suggest removal )

Just how much can she get away with? I guess it helps to have a friend at the Gazette write articals about/for you. Too bad this situation pushed M Williams into retirement and caused so little trouble for B Davis

On Rec director violated city policy: Attorney

Posted on January 20 at 12:06 p.m. ( Suggest removal )

Congrats to B Davis, she got away with another one......

On City employee destroyed record: Investigation

Posted on December 10 at 11:57 a.m. ( Suggest removal )

Let's take a poll, all in favor of Mike Williams staying, write in and say so. All in favor of Ms Davis leaving write in also. How effective can she be without the trust of the people that report to her? From what I saw, the whole department was running a whole lot better while she was gone on her leave. I know Mike will not stay but without him, the city is on the losing end. By the way 1 vote for Mike Willams staying from me.

On City employee destroyed record: Investigation

Posted on December 10 at 10:29 a.m. ( Suggest removal )

"Bonnie Davis, recreation director, taped her conversations with Williams in May. Davis said she made the recordings to protect herself and her employee.'
I cannot figure out exactly what Davis was protecting herself and her employee from. Is there something missing here? Also, why go public instead of bringing the situation up to the new city management or the city council. The term self serving comes to mind. I also question the statement that the city did not request Mike Williams to retire... if that is true, please change you mind Mike. The city needs more managers like you and less like Ms. Davis, Any employee that doesn't worry about the recorder running when talking to her is making a mistake...how I wish all of Ms Davis's conversations had been recorded...very interesting concept. Any former employees have any thoughts on that one???

On Attorney probes alleged destruction of city records

Posted on October 31 at 8:51 a.m. ( Suggest removal )

And why was it removed????