On They're back: Social issues overtake US politics
Posted on February 11 at 3:35 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
fear, if you backed off your left wing ideology you could see that one of the largest problems with no nation budget is not the spending side, it is the plan the government has to collect funds. Without these plans many businesses have no idea what their costs are going to be. This macro level of uncertainty is not only a poor idea during a normal economic period it is a terrible idea during a period of recovery.
On They're back: Social issues overtake US politics
Posted on February 11 at 12:55 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
The government needs to get out of the business of stupid laws and policies that protect people from themselves and mandating social arrangements that have no issues on other peoples’ lives. They (govt) have shown for decades they are unable to efficiently do the required tasks the citizens need. It is no wonder our national debt is larger now than the whole size of the national economy, it has only been 3 years since those in power decided our country needed to pass a budget. Politics has jumped the shark and our country is headed in the same direction as those in Europe if not corrected very soon.
Posted on February 11 at 12:49 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
The longer this takes the more murky it looks.
On Democrat: Wis. GOP recall challenges won't stand
Posted on February 11 at 12:43 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Joan a truly educated person would take the time to read the study before posting it as proof to support an uneducated assumption. In this study, done by a person in Britain, he clearly defined his idea of conservative and liberal; neither with a political connotation.
Conservative: caring mostly about their family and friends.
Liberal: caring about an indefinite number of genetically unrelated strangers they never meet or interact with.
An uneducated person would take these definitions and try to place them into American politics to placate their own self-interests, but that in no way supports the points made in the study. As with most topics, posting without all the information leads to misunderstandings. The same study suggests that people that sleep later in the day and stay up later at night is also a characteristic of higher intelligence. Jumping to conclusions, like you did earlier, a simple declaration would be teenagers that sleep until noon and stay up until 3am (playing video games) are smarter than their teachers that sleep normal hours to sustain home family life and job stability. Having all the information around data before making baseless assumptions is a good thing.
On White House: ’Absolutely firm,’ but willing to talk, on birth control
Posted on February 9 at 10:36 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
No2 your idiotic babble continues. If you took the time to read instead of blather you could easily see I asked a question to a poster on their position based on their comment. I never said any organization should or shouldn't participate in the political process. Yet once again the liberal jester has no clue of what is going on. As soon as your classes are over perhaps there are some more mayors for you to call...
On White House: ’Absolutely firm,’ but willing to talk, on birth control
Posted on February 9 at 3:47 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
carlito I think all groups should at the very least follow the law. Your perception of the tax exempt status of labor unions needs some research; you will find your remark opposite of the truth. I agree with you that becoming a parent is a choice that should not involve the government as I also believe coverage’s for medical insurance are also no business of the government. For the record a political party doesn’t pass laws, as you implied of the GOP and abortion. I agree on your comment that some people are ignorant, some even on things they think they know about as No2 has shown on more than one occasion.
On White House: ’Absolutely firm,’ but willing to talk, on birth control
Posted on February 9 at 3:41 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Again No2 you obviously have no idea what the comments were before you tossed you nonsense into the ring. Asking a poster if their idea that tax exempt organizations should or shouldn’t do something is consistent hardly required your input that is unless you are one of the many that think they need more than one account to make their points and it was your other account I asked the question of. As the local liberal loon jester you have indeed led the ideological parade to nowhere again, pat yourself on the back.
On White House: ’Absolutely firm,’ but willing to talk, on birth control
Posted on February 9 at 2:16 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
No2 instead of pretending your google search to wiki provided you with information others don’t know, I suggest you should pull your head out of the darkness and read words provided instead of trying to inject your 1 cent on more useless information. Another fun aspect to parsing left wing retorts, besides identifying hypocrisy, is identifying those that defend it.
On White House: ’Absolutely firm,’ but willing to talk, on birth control
Posted on February 9 at 12:27 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
4bears stated "if the Bishops want to tell people how they should vote than maybe they should start shelling out some taxes. If they want to start influencing elections.. bye bye tax exempt!!"
-
Just wondering if you think the same for all tax exempt groups that influence elections? If you do I wonder why you havn't stated some labor unions should lose their tax exempt status as well?
Page 1 of 838 | Next
On Democrat: Wis. GOP recall challenges won't stand
Posted on February 11 at 3:40 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
As is typical fear, you failed comprehension during your scanning of posted words again. These were not my definitions they came from professor of the previous linked study and were used in his study. If you truly based things on what’s right and wrong many of your postings would be vastly different than they are.