On Redacted truth, subjunctive outrage
Posted on May 22 at 3:36 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Dems and deniers are playing at msdnc news...LOL
On Committee to consider double dipping changes
Posted on May 21 at 3:32 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
It is clear either people are unclear for the reasons behind this legislation or are just trolling yet again.
http://www.governing.com/topics/public-w...
Posted on May 21 at 3:13 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Ole fearfulrhetoric couldn't make it through another round of ranting without tossing out the racist claims.
Fear have you taken a moment to think for yourself and question why the folks from wikileaks who have thousands of times posted classified/sensitive data for the world to see have gone uncharged by the same admin that thinks a reporter from the evil fox network is "listed" as "at the very least, either as an aider, abettor and/or co-conspirator" in a case where the target has already been charged...
"The government has prosecuted and even imprisoned journalists in leak cases in the past for the journalists' refusal to disclose a confidential source. In such cases, notably the 2005 Judith Miller case, journalists have been charged with contempt of court.
Instead of relying on the threat of a contempt charge to get journalists to divulge their sources, the Obama administration has used warrantless wiretapping and dragnet records seizures to identify who is talking to whom.
Last week it emerged that the Department of Justice had seized phone records for more than 20 lines used by the Associated Press, in possible violation of regulations governing such seizures. There have been no reports of the government accusing journalists of criminal activity in that case."
http://m.guardiannews.com/world/2013/may...
On A look at why the Benghazi issue keeps coming back
Posted on May 21 at 3 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Poor fearfulrhetoric. The talking points from the left have endlessly tried to say the reasons for "X" were due to funding cuts from the republican led congress. The fact wally and presumably you are now off that talking point only shows you are closer to seeing the real facts and stopping the crazy rhetoric.
Posted on May 21 at 12:49 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Pigford, Fast and Furious, IRS, DOJ, EPA, AP, Benghazi, leaked tax returns, and claims from the Sen leader that a presidential candidate didn't pay taxes...while silent on the presidential appointments who really didn't. Yep, no problems here. Time to stop digging and get back to the business of looking for home grown terrorists from the tea party groups.
On A look at why the Benghazi issue keeps coming back
Posted on May 21 at 12:45 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Fun reading how arm-chair military expert liberals have the answers and claim those with other ideas are nothing but arm-chair cub scouts playing general.
Posted on May 20 at 10:10 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Joe never asked you to apologize, just pointing out how you act like most from the left wing...do as I say not as I do.
Posted on May 20 at 8:22 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
"Your decision to act like a child in the name-calling..."
Well Joe... I see you are indeed just another member of the do as I say not as I do party. Here are examples of your own posts doing the same thing you are now complaining over. How exactly are you to be taken seriously when you whine about something you do?
"You get down on your knees and salaam to them reverently,"
"Slow down, little man. Take a deep breath. Put on your big boy pants. You're gonna give yourself the vapors with your hysteria and loss of self-control."
"The sheep who are the blind followers of the GOP will never question anything dishonest."
Note these are just from you account lately, not sure what comments from your brother's are yours or his.
Posted on May 20 at 8:11 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
"So knock off the self-aggrandizing claims of your fairness"
-
Are you really that clueless? I never proclaimed anymore than what I did say, not what you think I staid. If you need help I will post it again; " I have also continually stated there are nuts on both ends of the spectrum just like there are racist on both sides." What that has to do with the current speak or a radio dude only you would know. If you can point to an event that the current speaker did that is illegal or nut-worthy toss it out and I will comment on it. As for commenting on rush that makes as much sense as commenting on ed schultz, both are blow hards and irrelevant.
Page 1 of 1189 | Next
On Benghazi redacted
Posted on May 23 at 4:30 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
"It has long been part of the Washington game for officials to discredit a news story by playing up errors in a relatively small part of it. Pfeiffer gives the impression that GOP operatives deliberately tried to “smear the president” with false, doctored e-mails.
But the reporters involved have indicated they were told by their sources that these were summaries, taken from notes of e-mails that could not be kept. The fact that slightly different versions of the e-mails were reported by different journalists suggests there were different note-takers as well."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact...