Los Angeles wants to take bite out of fast food
Photo 
Pedestrians walk past an El Pollo Loco restaurant in Los Angeles on Monday. In South Los Angeles, fast food is also the easiest cuisine to find, and that's a problem for elected officials who see it as an unhealthy source of calories and cholesterol. The City Council is poised to vote Tuesday on a moratorium on new fast-food restaurants in a swath of the city where a proliferation of such eateries goes hand in hand with more fat adults and chunky children than other areas of Los Angeles.
LOS ANGELES In the impoverished neighborhood of South Los Angeles, fast food is the easiest cuisine to find — and that's a problem for elected officials who see it as an unhealthy source of calories and cholesterol.
The City Council was poised to vote Tuesday on a moratorium on new fast-food restaurants in a swath of the city where a proliferation of such eateries goes hand-in-hand with obesity.
"Our communities have an extreme shortage of quality foods," City Councilman Bernard Parks said.
The aim of the yearlong moratorium, which was approved last week in committee, is to give the city time to try to attract restaurants that serve healthier food.
The California Restaurant Association says the moratorium, which could be extended up to two years, is misguided.
Fast food "is the only industry that wants to be in South LA," said association spokesman Andrew Casana. "Sit-down restaurants don't want to go in. If they did, they'd be there. This moratorium isn't going to help them relocate."
The proposed ban comes at a time when governments of all levels are increasingly viewing menus as a matter of public health. Last Friday, California became the first state in the nation to bar trans fats, which lowers levels of good cholesterol and increases bad cholesterol.
It also comes as the Los Angeles City Council tackles issues beyond safety, schools and streets. The council last week decided to outlaw plastic bags.
Fast-food restaurants have found themselves in the frying pan in a number of cities. Some places, including Carmel-by-the Sea and Calistoga, have barred "formula" restaurants altogether; others have placed a cap on them — Arcata allows a maximum of nine fast-food eateries; others have prohibited the restaurants in certain areas, such as Port Jefferson, N.Y., in its waterfront area.
Most initiatives were designed to preserve a city's historic character. The Los Angeles bid is one of few that cite residents' health.
The mounting pressure has caused chains to insert healthier food choices in their menus. McDonalds offers salads and low-fat dressings; Burger King stocks Kids Meals with milk and apple pieces.
That's why the restaurant industry says it's unfair to blame them for fat people.
"What's next — security guards at the door saying 'You're overweight, you can't have a cheeseburger'?" Casana said.
But public health officials say obesity has reached epidemic proportions in low-income areas such as South Los Angeles and diet is the key reason.
According to the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, 30 percent of adults in South Los Angeles area are obese, compared to 19.1 percent for the metropolitan area and 14.1 percent for the affluent westside. Minorities are particularly affected: 28.7 percent of Latinos and 27.7 percent of blacks are obese, compared to 16.6 percent of whites.
Perry says that's no accident. South LA residents lack healthy food options, including grocery stores, fresh produce markets — and full-service restaurants with wait staff and food prepared to order.
A report by the Community Health Councils found 73 percent of South L.A. restaurants were fast food, compared to 42 percent in West Los Angeles.
If the moratorium is passed, Perry wants to lure restaurateurs and grocery retailers to area.
Rebeca Torres, a South Los Angeles mother of four, said she would welcome more dining choices, even if she had to pay a little more. "They should have better things for children," she said. "This fast-food really fattens them up."
Jul 29, 2008 at 3:10 p.m.
Suggest removal
Yet another mystery your just going to have to live with.
Jul 29, 2008 at 3:05 p.m.
Suggest removal
Hey Bill. When is the last time you were in California? Or out of Rock County for that matter.
Jul 29, 2008 at 2:58 p.m.
Suggest removal
California, the golden state, home of the Ninth Federal Circuit Court of Appeals (the source of the next couple of Supreme Court Justices if the Democrats have their way), location of the largest concentration of “Sanctuary Cities” in the country, whose Governor is the prototypical RINO (Republican In Name Only, a title John McCain has been able to lay claim to from time to time in the past), with a legislature whose attempt to “control” the cost of electricity nearly bankrupted the state, whose largest city, the City of Angels, has now decided to institute the “Obese Police” for the protection and welfare of its citizens who it views as too simple-minded to make their own dining choices while encouraging and empowering the Pop-Culture which largely originates from there to consume the minds and bodies of its residents, and ours, with a philosophy of amoral self-fulfillment. With benefactors such as these it’s a wonder we all don’t move to California.
Jul 29, 2008 at 12:37 p.m.
Suggest removal
No
Jul 29, 2008 at 12:14 p.m.
Suggest removal
who said they spend $20.00 on every meal ?? it's a well known fact that fast food is cheap and high in calories. taco bell has food for less then $1.00 and the other chains all have a $1.00 menu. so yes it is cheap(there are no culvers in california). why are poor people the subject anyways ? fat has no idea how much money you make and janesville is a perfect example of fat but not poor people. california is the 3rd largest economy in the world and janesville isn't even on the list. so shut up california haters.
Jul 29, 2008 at 11:40 a.m.
Suggest removal
if they are poor they are probably receiving government assistance. what are they doing with the food stamps? do we have to continue micro-managing the volunteer poor. yes, they choose it. there are many options to setting around and being poor. if you are poor, how in the world can you eat till you are FAT?
Jul 29, 2008 at 10:35 a.m.
Suggest removal
At least the wise and caring authorities in La La Land allow their residents to where their pants as low as they want unlike those tyrants in the suburbs of Chicago. I doubt that the ACLU will come to the aid of fast food franchisers as they did for the fashonistas of Lynwood.
Jul 29, 2008 at 10:15 a.m.
Suggest removal
I don't understand how this works. Fast food is not cheap. I could not afford to feed my family on fast food (and I sure wouldn't want to). Maybe it's different being poor in LA (everything else is different). Could someone please explain to me how these poor people are able to spend $20 or more on every meal?
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.