As the city of Janesville considers a 100-foot cell tower at the Rock County 4-H fairgrounds, do you approve of the proposal?
| Response | Percent | Votes |
|---|---|---|
| Yes | 65% | 609 votes |
| No | 29% | 274 votes |
| Nothing | 4% | 40 votes |
| Other—elaborate in comments | 1% | 13 votes |
| 936 total votes | ||

Jun 27, 2008 at 12:12 a.m.
Suggest removal
I voted nothing.
Is that like voting "present" but not actually taking a side?
It's possible that I'm missing the bigger picture, but I'm struggling to see why this was even made into a vote.
Jun 26, 2008 at 3:31 p.m.
Suggest removal
Why not it`s just a cellphone tower.
stop worrying so much people.
Jun 26, 2008 at 11:10 a.m.
Suggest removal
Why not put up several towers on the fair grounds and use the revenue for a larger, more convenient and accessable fair ground, with better entertainment selections- i.e. rodeo and other variety items to suit everyone-not just old country music, and move it to another Rock County location? Just wondering.
Jun 26, 2008 at 11:09 a.m.
Suggest removal
You don't build cell towers on hills or high elevations. They are designed to blanket an area and the height of the tower is enough to do that. The actual range in a city is a few miles at best. At 100 feet the effective line of sight is at least twenty miles. So, you don't build them on a hill but where it is needed. Suggesting GM sounds a bit spitefull!
Jun 26, 2008 at 10:54 a.m.
Suggest removal
Why would you want a cell tower in a RESIDENTIAL district...? It has no business being there! fools.
Jun 25, 2008 at 9:19 p.m.
Suggest removal
How about on top of the Court House Building? Seems pretty HIGH up to me.... The revenue will help pay for the renovation of the Court House and the new Police Dept. Building. The OLD GM ??? Probably will be torn down soon -as soon as GMAD finds a way to make the tax payers pay for the clean up of all the contamination there-INSIDE & OUT. Seen they are removing all the water fountain inside the building as we speak-will certainly hide the brown water going through the pipes...and I'm not talking about the flood waters. I feel really sorry for those who drank that crap for years or made coffee out of it (the only way to hide the bad color/odor)
Jun 25, 2008 at 2:40 p.m.
Suggest removal
The elevation at GM is rather low, as is the entire river basin. It doesn't appear to be, but the fairgrounds is at a higher elevation, thus better a signal from a cell tower located there. Maybe one of you geographically knowledgable folks can help me out here on the difference of feet-above-sea-level.
Jun 24, 2008 at 9:42 p.m.
Suggest removal
Would the money be used for the fairgrounds or would it go into the general fund?
Jun 24, 2008 at 7:47 p.m.
Suggest removal
Can you hear me now?
Jun 24, 2008 at 7:03 p.m.
Suggest removal
Dr Fever: Because the population density and median income is much lower near the old GM building... not as many cell phone users who would be using high bandwidth services.
An alternative would be near the interstate - like Marshall or Sentry, but then the state would get the money.
Jun 24, 2008 at 6:03 p.m.
Suggest removal
How about 3 or 4 towers at the OLD GM building ?
Jun 24, 2008 at 4:04 p.m.
Suggest removal
It would be revenue for the fairgrounds all year long.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.