“Was it because of a protest or is it because of guys out for a walk one night and they decide they go kill some Americans?”

OR WAS IT A PLANNED TERRORIST ATTACK ON THE ANNIVERSARY OF 9/11/01?

BTW: fordfan: I only check in now and then so you may have made similar statements before concerning the thousands killed in Iraq and Iran. I posted months ago after this terroist attack that the liberals would simply ignore it or, worse, say that it was nothing compared to what Bush had caused in Iraq and Afganistan. Took a while for me to see it but you certainly took that route. By the way, Bush stopped being President four + years ago. I also have a bit of a personal issue here as have a brother that works for USAID and is stationed in one of the African countries. Hope they have better security there.

I see another partisan goon has revealed himself, thanks! Good Lord the blind partisanship from both democrats and republicans is ridiculous, prounion, you do realize that yes Fox is right leaning and promotes an agenda, but so does CBS, NBC, ABC, MSNBC and CNN all to the left. The continuation of democrats making excuses for Obama and his failures is as pathetic and embarrassing as the Republicans giving Bush a pass on his. Or let's keep it local the Republicans that continue to fall for the BS that Paul Ryan is a fiscal conservative.

Right Data - tell it to FOX News.

And so what if we would not have heard about Monica Lewinsky - we would have saved a ton of money on all the legal nonsense the Republicans insisted on and been better off for it.

Interesting that some people think it was no big deal Embassy burned, four Americans dead, and then a cover-up and Clinton gets a pass. That's not a big deal, huh?? I'd bet you'd think it was a big deal and would be demanding answers if one of the dead was a relative of YOURS.

MrData, one word... excellent.

This is an article that must be taken very seriously. It's from the totally unbiased Heritage foundation, and the question was from senator "sunspot" who was trying to appear relevant. This will just about finish Hillary's chance to be president. RIGHT!

Why isn't there an outcry of the blatant racism displayed by the state department and the administration? Wasn't the excuse that a vide on Youtube used as to the catalyst of the 'riot' that killed 4 Americans? The Administration and state department knew that wasn't true if not during, shortly after. However they perpetuated this reason for at least 2 weeks. Why? Because it is possible in their eyes that Muslims would go bat S crazy over a video and just start irrationally killing? What is even worse is they thought we would buy that reason as well, and sadly any did. It isn't uncommon for Democrats to push racist themes, it is a huge reason I stopped voting Democrat in my 20's (The GOP is not above doing the same btw). Before you run this through your partisan filtered goggles, really think about what I just posted and ask yourself, was this not racist rhetoric aimed at a particular group in order to deflect from the failure of the administration? As far as me taking the job with the state department I think it is too obvious I am too honest, not corrupt enough and I don't participate in partisan games, so yes I am unqualified.

The bottom line is that Hillary Clinton was incredibly flippant about those deaths by that outburst...That alone should disqualify her for ANYTHING.

I cannot honestly blame those in either party for being 'sheeple', as Eagle1 calls them. There's an old saying .. KNOWLEDGE IS POWER. Our Founding Fathers knew that 236 years ago when they created this nation. They had experienced tyranny, lies, and government monarchs censoring the truth.. That is why they fought so hard to create our new nation....America. The Founders counted on the nation's FREE PRESS to be the watchdog for us over our government, reporting to us, the nation's citizens, the honest, unbiased facts about our government's, and its politician's, actions regardless of political affiliations.

For decades journalists reporting the news to us held their political bias in check while they did their job honestly. From Huntley and Brinkley, to Douglas Edwards, to Peter Jennings, to the Mighty liberal Walter Cronkite, best of all journalists, our news was truly accurately reported in a professional manner of journalism and news reporting. The decline into bias reporting began with CBS' Dan Rather when he openly lied about GWBush and then had to apologize nationally for his bias. Today such lies are reported every evening as facts without neary an apology (or correction) to the news watchers. Movie stars, and the entertainment industry including musicians, were never as liberally biased a few decades back as they have become today. And our educators have become such loyal union mongers that their liberalism now clouds the facts in the lessons they teach to the kids in our schools.

When our nation's KNOWLEDGE becomes LIBERALLY BIASED and horribly TAINTED through unfactual, intentionally misleading information in our national evening news; unfactual intentionally misleading lessons in our schools and universities; and unfactual intentionally misleading information in our movies and the songs we see and hear regularly. It is no wonder so many Americans are fooled about facts.

I have lived through decades of growth, change, recessions, and problems in the USA. But we Americans always had access to the facts and figures about what was happening in our government or with our politicians. It’s never been this openly, disgustingly bad. If Clinton had the liberal news media that Obama enjoys today, none of us would have ever heard about that woman .. Miss Lewinski, or the stain on her blue dress, or what Bill liked her to do to him in the Oval Office.

Our nation cannot blame just the Repubs for ALL the problems with our nation, as the media - our educators - our entertainers expect us to. They are fools and they either intentionally, or ignorantly, lie to us.

No one in either political party is blameless. It is no wonder millions of Americans believe as they do. The national propaganda machine and its censorship of the facts keep Americans dumbed down. Most have no idea of what is happening in this world, or WHY! As Hillary asked Congress last week. WHO CARES? Not liberals apparently!

There is no pleasing some people. The State dept was releasing information to the public as they were being made aware. Albeit, the information was based on bad intelligence. If they had waited until all of the facts were analyzed and confirmed there would be people saying there was a coverup. They released bad information, there was a coverup, if they had released no information there was a cover up, if they had waited to confirm intelligence reports there was a cover up. If some of you people who comment here are so informed and experienced in the matters of State and world terrorism, why don't you apply for the job??? Until then keep your mouths shut for YOU KNOW NOT WHAT YOU SPEAK OF.

We got the same response from her on the missing Rose Law firm billing records with her finger prints all over them. Lying will get you far in Washington!

It is lovely to see partisans defending failure from their party, much like the GOP supported failure from Bush. More evidence there is little if any difference in the parties and how they operate. This is a huge deal in the scope of things much larger than Watergate, Iran Contra and Anything Clinton (Bill) was investigated for, but we have become a country of sheeple unable to separate right from our idiotic party loyalty. Sad sad sad.

When you have nothing to offer like the Republican's, you have to blow anything WAY out of proportion to try to save face.

Just remember, on 9/11/1012 we tragically lost four American Embassy workers. On 9/11/2001, we tragically lost 3,000 Americans in a single attack that President Bush had been warned was coming. Then Bush followed it up with another 4,500 Americans by invading a country (Iraq) that was of no threat to us. Then we lost another 2,000+ by having to clean up the mess in Afghanistan that was left when Bush pulled troops out to invade Iraq.

When you have nothing to offer as the Republican Party, you have to make up something to divert attention. Some people have very short memories or are disingenuous or both.

NVgrf.. asks .."I wonder why this idiot does not include her next sentence? More selective quotations by the goofy right!"

In her next sentence Hillary Clinton blurted out .."WHO cares?"

The nation cares, Madam Secretary, even if you do not.

Hillary Clinton had a moment of a psychiatric meltdown ... a dissociative reaction with her bumbling attack on Senator Johnson clearly out of frustration that HER failing was being aired publicly to the nation and her remorse and HER own guilt could no longer be covered up.

As the very liberal New York Times wrote after Hillary's testimony ... she claims to be accountable for the State Department's actions, but NOT responsible for the deaths of State Dept. personnel in Benghazi.

Typical Clinton / liberal diatribe. It's always someone else's fault.

What difference did it make in Watergate? What difference did it make in Iran-Contra? What difference did it make in the War on Iraq? The cover up is always the worst part of these scandals, this one will linger for Mrs. Clinton with those of us that have a memory, I am very disappointed in her, the handling of this by Hillary has caused me to lose all the respect I gained for her since she became a Senator. There was massive mishandling of Benghazi and the BS excuses and reasons for the attack are not only insulting but possibly criminal. I realize nothing will happen to the current administration because the GOP hasn't got the balls to really pursue anything so those of us that are disgusted by the events of this past September 11th will have to remember this testimony during the 2016 campaign. Shame!

The difference it makes is covering up the known cause of the attact for political gain (or at least to avoid political loss) shortly before an election. There are lies, and then there are whopper lies for the slimiest of reasons.

On Hillary’s mea culpa

Posted on October 18 at 1:49 a.m. ( Suggest removal )

I tend to disagree he threw her under the bus thus ruining any chance at a future run. Obama supporting women Ha! It is all about him maybe just maybe if he would have attended some briefings he would have heard the problems in Bengazi pulled the crew at the embassy or at least said yes lets beef up security. It is ultimately the presidents fault not his cabinet. His cabinet was put into place to help advise the president, not to protect him from decisions that should and have to be made.

Even before her testimony I said Obama threw her under the bus and ruined any chance she had at becoming president.

The same left fringe that declared Bush knew about 9-11 before it happened, stayed in the school too long following the attacks, or even declared the story of WMD was made up have no problems with this incident. To them delaying the real facts surrounding the incident, just prior to a national election is just fine. I suspect these same folks also once declared Ronny sent Bush Sr. on a SR-71 to stage the hostage release until after that election. Sadly their history of lack of conviction continues.

“Was it because of a protest or is it because of guys out for a walk one night and they decide they go kill some Americans?”

Still in cover up mode. Could not even admit to it being a planned terrorist attack on the anniversary of 9/11/01. Know she said they were going to work on improving things. Know they can not bring the people back to life. KNOW IT WAS NOT guys out for a walk one night and they decide they go kill some Americans?

The above statement, not the "what does it matter" disgusted me when I heard it live and still does. I was a supporter of her 4 years ago. Never again.

Secretary Clinton said at the hearing, "Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night decided to go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator."

Now I'll grant the Ms. Clinton probably isn't feeling her best yet, but jumpin' Jehoshaphat, can't we expect better than that from someone like her? What difference does it make???? How can we figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again if the details don't make any difference????

I am glad, however, that Senator Johnson didn't rip into her for her haughty remark. Her statement speaks for itself and volumes about her. There was no need to ask anything more. Senator Johnson showed a lot of grace. (The Senator certainly shows a lot more grace than the commenter who only seems capable of expressing his disdain for the article by calling the author an idiot. I thought a fistful of Master's degrees would make one more eloquent than that.)

I wonder why this idiot does not include her next sentence? More selective quotations by the goofy right!