Janesville School Board approves changes in administrator salaries
JANESVILLE The Janesville School Board agreed to raises for principals and other administrators on an 8-1 vote Tuesday night.
At the same time, the board approved paying the administrators based on their skills and performance. Now, pay is based on experience.
The only dissenting voice was that of Peter Severson, who wanted to limit the new system to a one-year contract, but the rest of the board voted to keep the changes as proposed, a two-year contract starting in the 2013-14 school year.
Administrators will be eligible for an increase in their base pay of up to 1.5 percent and for incentive pay of up to 4.5 percent. It's highly unlikely that any administrator will get the full 6 percent, especially in the first year, because "the bar has been set rather high," said Superintendent Karen Schulte.
The change affects 35 individuals, including assistant principals and central-office administrators. The increases are expected to cost about $200,000 a year, which Schulte said was 0.016 percent of the district budget.
Severson said he didn't want to stop employees from continuing to get pay raises in the second year, but he said the district should not be locked into a system for two years before it's known that the system works well.
Extend the system next year if it's working, Severson suggested, or set a two-year contract next year.
The two-year contract is intended to show the district's commitment to its administrators, said Steve Sperry, director of human resources. Schulte said a two-year contract is standard practice.
Board member Kristin Hesselbacher said Schulte and her cabinet have worked hard to assemble its leadership team, and those administrators could go to another district, make the same money, not work as hard, and get a two-year contract.
"It's time to walk the talk about this performance-based leadership," Hesselbacher said, and that means rewarding performance.
Board President Bill Sodemann said if a principal delivers the kind of test-score increases the district is aiming for, he'd gladly pay the full amount budgeted for incentive pay.
Administrators have gotten only one raise in the past four years, a 2.5 percent increase in 2010.
The board has not addressed pay for other district workers next year, but it met in closed session Tuesday to consider offers to negotiate from the employee unions. Several residents addressed the board, asking them to negotiate with the teachers union.


Jan 11, 2013 at 10:18 a.m.
Suggest removal
physics,
What is your remedy? What specifically are you proposing? Are you annointing yourself king and now the citizenry is compelled to live under your rule?
Maybe you have crystal balls and know what is going to happen in the future-if you do-please tell your subjects what equities we should invest in....(and if I should bet on the Packers to win the Super Bowl).....
Jan 10, 2013 at 10:23 p.m.
Suggest removal
Gentlemen there is a big difference between that election & this subject. And I seriously doubt people opposing this move would be in minority. I don't care if these people were elected or not if they behave this way afterward and the people oppose it then they like any other leadership role in this country can be upended. I also doubt it would be as difficult & costly as say a governor recall, big difference!
Jan 10, 2013 at 4:47 p.m.
Suggest removal
physics,
Maybe there is displeasure-but this is the decision that was made. The board was dully elected. Run for school board on the promise that you are king and you will change the incentives. Good luck.
I remember not too long ago a US Governor promised to run on specific platform-and people voted him in office. There was an outrage by a minority of people that were upset that the dully elected governor would actually implement the policies he ran on-so millions of dollars were wasted in a feeble attempt to remove a politician who did what he said he would do. The finest example of temper tantrum minority politics in a generation!
If you wish to fund an expensive recall on the guise that you didnt know what your school board would do without your approval-go ahead.
Caveat emptor.
Jan 10, 2013 at 4:18 p.m.
Suggest removal
Besides the voting population isn't fully aware of all the specifics which come with a candidate. I'd be willing to bet if signatures were collected from the entire voting population on this particular subject it would reflect disapproval.
Jan 10, 2013 at 4:13 p.m.
Suggest removal
This wasn't mentioned when these individuals ran & if it would have been the results would be different today. Hence the reason for my question.
Jan 10, 2013 at 2:17 p.m.
Suggest removal
physiscs,
This is representative democracy at work. Why would you want to overturn this? This is why there are elections.
Jan 10, 2013 at 2:15 p.m.
Suggest removal
Domino,
If hundreds of "critical" FTEs have been cut I expect that the tax paying public will see a direct impact from the reduction in force-namely reduced graduation rates and poorer test scores-and since the tax paying public has a vested interest in an educated society-I am certain that those people who lost their jobs, or had to take a reduction in pay will gladly pay more in property taxes to fund teachers salaries, pensions, benefits, to maintain the quality education a child receives in the JSD.
Jan 10, 2013 at 2:15 p.m.
Suggest removal
Domino,
If hundreds of "critical" FTEs have been cut I expect that the tax paying public will see a direct impact from the reduction in force-namely reduced graduation rates and poorer test scores-and since the tax paying public has a vested interest in an educated society-I am certain that those people who lost their jobs, or had to take a reduction in pay will gladly pay more in property taxes to fund teachers salaries, pensions, benefits, to maintain the quality education a child receives in the JSD.
Jan 10, 2013 at 2:15 p.m.
Suggest removal
Domino,
If hundreds of "critical" FTEs have been cut I expect that the tax paying public will see a direct impact from the reduction in force-namely reduced graduation rates and poorer test scores-and since the tax paying public has a vested interest in an educated society-I am certain that those people who lost their jobs, or had to take a reduction in pay will gladly pay more in property taxes to fund teachers salaries, pensions, benefits, to maintain the quality education a child receives in the JSD.
Jan 10, 2013 at 1:45 p.m.
Suggest removal
Is there any way for the people to legally over turn this?
Jan 10, 2013 at 12:30 p.m.
Suggest removal
TCB
It is paradise, especially since they've cut hundreds of positions and everyone is doing their own job plus the jobs of those who were cut. And not to mention all of the new iniatives that were added. It's no different than if a factory cuts 200 jobs but the the product demands stay the same and you're expected to produce the same amount.
Jan 10, 2013 at 12:02 p.m.
Suggest removal
janesvillean- They are in the red, $3.94 million.
"The board was unanimous in approving the tax levy, the budget and use of the reserves, or fund balance, to plug a budget shortfall of $3.94 million."
http://gazettextra.com/news/2012/oct/24/...
Jan 10, 2013 at 11:23 a.m.
Suggest removal
eetech, the School District reduced the tax levy by almost 2% for the current budget cycle. The budget is not in the red. What numbers are you using?
Jan 10, 2013 at 9:30 a.m.
Suggest removal
carlito-can you please post a linke where wages were reduced-that is a specific reduction in Salary? Perhaps the JSD salary schedule that demonstrates a decrease in wages from step to step? After all teachers should receive automatic pay increases irrespective of student achievement or economic conditions? Right?
What other field should receive automatic salary increases irrespective of economic condition? Sounds like a workers paradise to me!
Jan 10, 2013 at 8:46 a.m.
Suggest removal
eetech- here are all the board members, including their email addresses.
http://www.janesville.k12.wi.us/Default....
Jan 10, 2013 at 8:07 a.m.
Suggest removal
Schulte is ineffective and fails as the JSD top dog.
Jan 10, 2013 at 7:45 a.m.
Suggest removal
Can we please get links to the BOE emails? I have a piece of my mind that they all need to hear!
Jan 10, 2013 at 7:42 a.m.
Suggest removal
"The change affects 35 individuals, including assistant principals and central-office administrators. The increases are expected to cost about $200,000 a year, which Schulte said was 0.016 percent of the district budget."
The fact that this was figured out shows a feeling of guilt or that they know what they did was wrong. BOE, MORONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Are you kidding. They get up to 6% raises and the more important aspect of our district will possibly be taking cuts. This is absolutely infuriating. YOU ARE IN THE RED, what the heck are you thinking???????
Jan 9, 2013 at 10:55 p.m.
Suggest removal
Cut wages and benefit coverage for the real workers AKA Teachers, The Janesville School Board agreed to raises for principals and other administrators (CEO's) on an 8-1 vote Tuesday night. What a joke...
Jan 9, 2013 at 10:16 p.m.
Suggest removal
Hmmmm.....are the teachers ready to work for incentive pay?
Jan 9, 2013 at 8:30 p.m.
Suggest removal
"Board President Bill Sodemann said if a principal delivers the kind of test-score increases the district is aiming for, he'd gladly pay the full amount budgeted for incentive pay." First of all, Bill, YOU are not paying anything. The taxpayers are. Second, a principal cannot deliver squat without quality teachers doing their jobs in the classroom. Where is the incentive pay for the teachers who are actually producing the results ???
Jan 9, 2013 at 8:29 p.m.
Suggest removal
Board President Bill Sodemann said if a principal delivers the kind of test-score increases the district is aiming for, he'd gladly pay the full amount budgeted for incentive pay.
Just goes to show how out of freaking touch you are with the school system Billy. The principal should be rewarded for the test scores increasing huh? Not the teachers. Got a bone to pick huh? I am sure that is how it is in your business, you are rewarded for your employees breaking their backs but that doesn't mean it is right and it doesn't belong in the public school system. Please stick to the "private" sector where you can can demand respect and not have to earn it.
Oh yeah, and don't P.M. me calling me names. I don't care what you have to say, it means nothing.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.