Candidate Fallone: Court is 'broken'

By NICO SAVIDGE ( Contact )   Thursday, Feb. 28, 2013
ADVERTISEMENT
 

— State Supreme Court candidate Ed Fallone addressed the Democratic Party of Rock County's monthly meeting Wednesday night, saying incumbent Justice Pat Roggensack will not improve a court he called broken and dysfunctional.

It was an interesting audience and location—the Union Labor Temple in Janesville—for someone running in a non-partisan judicial race. The party even billed Fallone's appearance by saying he "Challenges Republican Roggensack."

Fallone emphasized a desire to stay independent in his remarks, however, and afterward said he would strive for a campaign that was above party politics.

"I don't believe it's healthy for our state to view our Supreme Court as a political institution," Fallone said. "I will do everything in my effort to keep this from turning into a partisan, political race."

Roggensack and Fallone defeated attorney Vince Megna in a Feb. 19 primary and will face off April 2 for a 10-year term on the bench.

Democratic Party of Rock County Chairman Mike Southers said there was nothing partisan about asking Fallone to speak at a party meeting. The group has invited Roggensack to speak at its next meeting in March, Southers said.

"Whether you're Dems or a Republican, you still have to vote April 2nd, and an educated and informed decision is so much the better," he said.

Fallone said he wants to talk with as many groups as possible and hopes to have a "broad base of support" but has not been invited to speak to any Republican organizations.

This election is unfolding without the clearly drawn partisan lines of the last state Supreme Court race in 2011, Southers said. Republican-backed incumbent David Prosser defeated challenger JoAnne Kloppenburg, who had the support of Democrats and labor groups, in that election.

Fallone told about 30 people at the meeting he decided to join this race last December, saying the court had become "broken." He cited a 2011 altercation between Prosser and Justice Ann Walsh Bradley—and Roggensack's decision to recuse herself from disciplinary actions against Prosser—as an example of the problems facing the court.

"I have no confidence that re-electing Justice Roggensack will solve the problem," Fallone said. "What we need now is a new approach, and new personalities on the bench."

He also criticized contributions made to Roggensack's campaign, and spending from the conservative Club for Growth, which ran ads supporting her.

If elected, Fallone said he would restore order to the court by being an independent justice.

"I will not be a part of any faction," he said. "No one will know in advance whose side I am on (or) how I will vote in a case. And it will change the dynamics."

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(9)
JohnWicket
Mar 1, 2013 at 11:48 a.m.
Suggest removal

Given the rhetoric that appears in these blog-responses, perhaps Wisconsin should consider banishing the word "non-partisan" from races for the judiciary. I've found that, while out doing campaign work on the streets for judiciary candidates, the words "I'm non-partisan" really means that the person intends to say that "I'm a Conservative Republican and won't talk to you" or "I am a non-voter who doesn't care enough to go out and vote." Either way the respondents exhibit a thinly veiled attempt at equivocation or dishonesty. I much appreciate and respect those who have the courage to face me and tell me what they honestly think. An honest exchange of views is preferable to deceit. Without such exchange of views our society falls short of being a real democracy.

dtb
Mar 1, 2013 at 11:32 a.m.
Suggest removal

Of course this is a partisan political race. We all know that. Let's not pretend any different.

Third_Eye
Mar 1, 2013 at 8:42 a.m.
Suggest removal

The problem is, there is no problem.
The altercation between Justice Prosser and Justice Walsh-Bradley has been vetted and based on the media coverage neither 'side' can claim the high road.
I suspect that what is 'broken' in the eyes of the left is that the court has not seen things their way in most cases.

Professor
Mar 1, 2013 at 8:42 a.m.
Suggest removal

Vet68--As opposed to what has ACTUALLY happened with the four 'righty' justices bought and paid for by WMC? And two of which, themselves, came to the Court under clouds of ethics violations? Oh, and, btw--Prosser wasn't a judge before he got elected to the high court.

wislady
Mar 1, 2013 at 8:09 a.m.
Suggest removal

Will we see an article on the "broken" Madison school system and the rigged hiring practices?

wislady
Feb 28, 2013 at 10:59 p.m.
Suggest removal

How about an article of what he has accomplished, instead of repeating his ignorant remarks. The Prosser accusation is very old, and not even correct. Kloppy tried that for her campaign, remember?

TroubleMaker
Feb 28, 2013 at 10:25 p.m.
Suggest removal

The two-party system (not even mentioned in our constitution) is at the root of our dysfunctional Government. Shame on the Gazette for printing an article that names those parties so many times when the topic shouldn't be addressed at all in a non-partisan election!

UWvet68
Feb 28, 2013 at 7:50 p.m.
Suggest removal

Fallone has no experience as a judge and if elected will only try to reverse all things not completely liberal and extreme lefty.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT