Janesville's debt will grow

By MARCIA NELESEN ( Contact )   Friday, Oct. 5, 2012
ADVERTISEMENT
 

— The Janesville City Council would add $14.42 million to the city's debt if it approves a suggested borrowing program.

Council members Monday night will be able to delete items from the borrowing note.

Staff will ask the council to award the sale of notes to the lowest bidder Oct. 22.

The council is being asked to borrow a total of $16.97 million; $14.42 million would be new debt and $2.55 million would be debt issued to refinance prior notes at lower interest and to restructure payments.

The note issue is slightly below the average of recent years, Assistant City Manager Jay Winzenz said.

The city's total debt at the end of 2011 was $74.8 million. The city will retire $13.3 million in debt in 2012 and add $14.42 million in 2013, pushing the total to $75.9 million at the start of 2013.

"What we try to do is more or less match the amount we are borrowing with the amount we're retiring so over time our amount of debt remains relatively stable," Winzenz said.

Of the $14.42 million, about $5.66 million would be paid through the general fund, which is funded by local property taxes.

The rest would be paid by the water and wastewater utilities, the library, TIF districts and special assessments.

Slightly more than half of the $5.66 million is to pay for projects already authorized by the council.

General fund borrowing of $5.66 million would require annual payments of $632,033, costing the owner of a $120,100 home about $20 a year for 10 years.

Because some debt is being retired and other debt is being restructured, overall general fund debt is estimated to increase about $100,000, or 1.93 percent in 2013. That would increase the property tax levy by 0.38 percent.

In 2013, the owner of a $120,100 home would pay an additional $3.11 in property taxes to pay off debt.

Of the proposed $16.97 million:

-- $2.3 million would be used for streets, including $30,000 to repair the concrete piers and foundation for the corrugated arches over Spring Brook in Palmer Drive and to repair the downtown parking plaza concrete deck.

-- $480,000 would be spent on storm sewers.

-- $895,000 would be used to buy, improve and maintain parks and public grounds, including $60,000 to rebuild three of the nine tennis courts in Palmer Park; $110,000 to expand parking at the Youth Sports Complex; $40,000 to replace playground equipment at Adams Park; $225,000 to buy blighted properties; $50,000 to repair the bike trail in the Palmer Park area, which was built in 1994; $310,000 to buy the building at 55 S. River St., the former Plaza Furniture; and $100,000 to repair Traxler Lagoon sidewalk and railing.

-- $1.55 million for public buildings and grounds, including $220,000 for energy-saving measures in city facilities; $780,000 for the ice arena renovation; $200,000 to build a multi-purpose room at the ice arena and update the Rockport Pool bathhouse; $100,000 to design an animal control facility because the Rock County Humane Society will not accept dogs whose owners are known; $60,000 to update City Hall elevators; and $185,000 for Tallman House improvements.

-- $100,000 for repairs to the downtown parking plaza, which will allow about half of the closed stalls to reopen.

-- $4.45 million to replace fire vehicles, golf equipment and equipment for the new automated waste collection.

-- $1.6 million to cap the current landfill section.

-- $1.12 million to construct and extend water mains, including $580,000 to replace lead pipes under the streets.

-- $1.53 million to build and extend sewer mains.

-- $400,000 to finance infrastructure improvements in TIF No. 25, which is on Kennedy Road north of Highway 14. The improvements were made between 2003 and 2011 and were paid for with the general fund. The TIF district has a negative cash balance, so is now borrowing money to pay back the general fund.

-- $2.55 million to refinance notes at a lower interest rate and extend the terms of the notes to reduce annual debt service.

Winzenz warned council members at their last meeting that two large capital projects loom in 2013 and 2014: a new fire station, for which the city would have to borrow $6 million, and an animal holding facility at a cost of more than $2 million.

Winzenz projected debt would go up $500,000 in 2014 and about $1.6 million in 2015.

"We need to start having some discussions if we're looking to cut some of that back," City Manager Eric Levitt said.

Based on previous discussions, council members might discuss reducing parking improvements at the Youth Sports Complex and delaying repair to the bike trail.

A motion to remove $30,000 for the Palmer Park tennis courts failed on a 3-3 vote.

Councilmember Sam Liebert made several suggestions to add to the debt, noting low interest rates. He suggested borrowing more to maintain city streets—that motion failed—and adding $50,000 for a skatepark—that motion did not get a second.

He asked whether the council could add money to the note issue for such nonprofit agencies as ECHO and HeathNet and was told the city could only borrow for capital projects.

On Monday, the council can only delete debt and cannot add.

Kealy wants city to cut debt

Several council members apparently took to heart a new survey gauging taxpayer preferences when they voted against borrowing money to repair tennis courts in Palmer Park.

Councilman Matt Kealy also asked council members to drive past Adams Park to see if $40,000 proposed for new playground equipment is needed.

The council at its last meeting was discussing borrowing $14.4 million for capital projects. A second vote will come before the council Monday.

The survey, commissioned by the council, puts parks and recreation at the bottom of several categories when it comes to how some taxpayers want to see their money spent.

The survey was done to help the council make budget decisions.

Kealy at the last council meeting noted Friends of Riverside Park refurbished tennis courts there and wondered if a users group could help out at Palmer Park.

Councilwoman Kathy Voskuil said the school district uses the courts for competitive tennis. Repairs have been delayed for several years, she said.

"It's gotten to the point where there are literally potholes in the tennis court," Voskuil said.

Kealy, DuWayne Severson and Deb Dongarra-Adams voted not to borrow $60,000. That failed, though, with Jim Farrell, Sam Liebert and Voskuil voting to keep it in. Russ Steeber left the meeting early.

Kealy said after the meeting that the survey shows a majority of residents would like the council to either reduce services or raise user fees in such areas as parks and recreation rather than raising taxes.

Kealy said he is taking a close look at items included in the borrowing. Some, such as replacing playground equipment, should be handled in the general fund, he said.

When the city borrows money, it has to pay it back, with interest.

Several large projects are looming in the next couple of years, including a new fire station, he said.

"We need to take a better look at needs versus wants," he said. "Certain things, like infrastructure, should be our top priority. The big thing is being responsible to yourselves and future generations."

Kealy said he hopes other council members will come to Monday's meeting armed with "hard questions and directions to control spending."

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(20)
whz_bng
Oct 12, 2012 at 8:44 a.m.
Suggest removal

Did anyone there ever consider a budget that would work on reducing the debt and tackle only the needs this year. Wow, that would be refreshing. Imagine taxes going down $20 a yr per $100,000 of AV. Billnewbie, I am afraid you are right. They think their job is to spend money.

kiowamohican
Oct 12, 2012 at 3:04 a.m.
Suggest removal

To bad the city did not have the powers of the federal government. Then they could just print some $$$'s to eliminate that shortfall!

concernedwi
Oct 7, 2012 at 2:04 a.m.
Suggest removal

When in doubt, blame the unions, or maybe it's the immigrants, have we seen the birth certificates of all of the board members yet?

physicsM2
Oct 7, 2012 at 12:48 a.m.
Suggest removal

As long as Janesville City Council is in a giving mood can I have an Audi TT and my wife wants a pair of Tiffany ear rings!? :)

These estimates are way too high lay off the doobie already!

4bears
Oct 7, 2012 at 12:01 a.m.
Suggest removal

rprp, if you had all the union jobs that are now gone, this might not be as bad a problem. I know it is difficult for you to grasp... most of those people had decent jobs, owned homes, PAID TAXES and spent money in the local economy...... yah, they're the cause... wake up!

janesvillean
Oct 6, 2012 at 8:02 p.m.
Suggest removal

Exactly, PanamaRed. This represents, for every dollar of debt held by the city this year, an increase of a penny and a half. Hardly cause for panic -- and a good portion of that is caused by the curtailment of state shared revenues. Given that most of us recall Gov. Tommy talking up shared revenue as property tax relief, it's hardly a surprise when cutting that back means greater pressure on municipal budgets, higher taxes, and more borrowing.
.
Janesville runs a very lean government even by Wisconsin standards, and at least before last year was ranked 167th in the state for its marginal tax rate. This borrowing is largely for capital projects, which will last the city for years if not decades, and it's very fiscally appropriate to pay for such investment over time. Few of these are really luxuries -- the tennis courts, for example, support the school district, and are in dire need of repair precisely because the city has deferred maintenance. Waiting longer on such things usually means paying more or losing the amenity to neglect.

PanamaRed
Oct 6, 2012 at 3:44 p.m.
Suggest removal

I would venture to guess most, if not all, the individuals posting comments are in debt themselves, heavily. If they own a house and a car their debt would most likely exceed their annual earnings.
-
The debt municipalities incur is not the problem IF its part of a controlled and systematic effort to improve and grow the community. Obviously most of these individuals posting have little knowledge of the resources needed to maintain and grow our community. Otherwise, they would run for a seat on the City Council instead of whining in the Gazette comment section.
-
You want to get back some of your investment in the ice arena - then go skating or check out a Jets or Bluebirds or Youth hockey game and you can see for yourself the positive impact remodeling the ice arena has had on this community.

svrwthr
Oct 6, 2012 at 11:35 a.m.
Suggest removal

@rprp, what do unions have to do with non-union city representitives spending more more money? Not a great fan of unions like the UAW because of the abuses that gave unions bad rep, but if it weren't for unions you would not have fair employment acts, a mandatory minimum wage, mandatory 10 minute breaks every 4 hours, equal opportunity employment mandates, and I could go on. Waiting for you to blame liberals now even when you are so bright you don't realize liberals reside in both political sides.

billnewbie
Oct 6, 2012 at 10:46 a.m.
Suggest removal

The trouble with government officials, especially elected officials but not exclusively, is that they think that to be effective, they have to spend money. They have to "invest" in ice arenas, parking structures, bicycle tunnels, round-abouts or whatever "good" idea comes along. Fiscal responsibility doesn't erect pretty new edifices that they can hang bronze plaques onto. They just don't think they're doing their jobs well unless they're funding something. That's why they don't see any problem with "stable" debt, which is debt that never gets repaid.

frogger
Oct 6, 2012 at 9:56 a.m.
Suggest removal

Lets flip some more house-that should help!!

rprp
Oct 6, 2012 at 9:20 a.m.
Suggest removal

This is a typical problem for state and local governments caused by unions.

frusion
Oct 6, 2012 at 9:10 a.m.
Suggest removal

3 topics in 2 sentences.

magua
Oct 6, 2012 at 7:44 a.m.
Suggest removal

The ice arena spending is ridiculous. Many schools balanced their budgets hitting teacher wages, why weren't police and fire included with Walker's "tools"?

frusion
Oct 6, 2012 at 7:09 a.m.
Suggest removal

This is crazy spending. I know it's nice to have nice things, but please city council, exersize fiscal responsibility. Spend it like it is coming out of your wallet. I believe people in positions that deal with big budgets start getting complacent with large numbers. A couple hundred thousand here and a couple over there--it just becomes numbers.

My opinion on spending for items like an all purpose room at the ice arena, sure, do it if you build a business case for return on the investment. And what is the deal with spending for water and sewer extensions? The city should be spending nothing on extending utilities. It should be just like utility extensions built by Alliant or any other regulated utility company. If a customer is willing to pay for an extension to their property then you build the extension.

Infrastructure first, wants second and only when you have surplus funds or you have a business case to show return on the investment.

truthteller
Oct 6, 2012 at 7:03 a.m.
Suggest removal

Yada- I can't believe I am saying this but I agree with you!

yada
Oct 6, 2012 at 6:51 a.m.
Suggest removal

WOODSMAN - I agree with you on the ice arena & agree with HOOTERS also. The list has MORE "wants than needs" - Lots of money can be saved if they really wanted to.

hooters
Oct 5, 2012 at 9:51 p.m.
Suggest removal

The list of spending looks to be more wants than needs. I agree...focus on infrastructure in these uncertain times. Quit borrowing for wants! Wants should be planned for and money raised for, not borrowed. Who cares if the interest rates are good. Gee...cheap money available, so what can we think of to spend it on! Local government no better than the federal government when it comes to spending beyond our means.

woodsman
Oct 5, 2012 at 6:16 p.m.
Suggest removal

Sure wish we could get "OUR" money back from ice arena !!

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT