School district planning administrative staff changes
JANESVILLE Superintendent Karen Schulte is rebuilding her administrative team by promoting two and eliminating one position for a net savings of about $70,000.
The school board's policy, personnel and curriculum committee approved the changes on Tuesday, sending them on to the full board with a unanimous vote.
The moves were prompted by the retirement of Mat Haeger, manager of health services, and the resignation of Angel Tullar, the longtime manager of employee relations.
Schulte told the committee she was not eager to make the changes but that she needs to look for ways to reduce expenses and become more efficient.
Here's a rundown of the changes:
-- Mary Ann Kahl, who was just hired to replace Tullar, would move into the newly created position of assistant director of administrative and human services.
Kahl is a former superintendent in an Illinois school district.
Tullar was paid $91,514 this year. Kahl would be paid $110,000.
"The appointment of Dr. Kahl allows us to have a person on staff who is a seasoned negotiator with knowledge of employee benefits, along with being a licensed administrator, thus having the ability to administrate programs and supervise and evaluate professional staff," Schulte wrote.
The change also allows Kahl to take the reins in the department while Steve Sperry, director of administrative and human services, recovers from an illness, Schulte told the committee.
Kahl (pronounced like "kale") would take charge of handbook development, among other duties. The handbook takes the place of union contracts that will be eliminated starting July 1, 2013. It would lay out work rules and benefits, among other items.
-- Tonya Williams, secretary to the manager of employee relations, would be promoted to a new position, employee relations specialist. Her annual salary would rise from $36,862 to $46,000.
Schulte said similar positions in this area have a salary range of $45,000 to $75,000.
Williams earned a bachelor's degree in human resources in 2008 and has continued to upgrade her skills in this area, Schulte said in a memo to the board.
"I believe it is important to have a seasoned employee in this role with experience and knowledge of our current (benefits) plan design," Schulte wrote. "It is also important to have a liaison between the (benefits) vendors … and School District of Janesville employees.
-- Haeger's position, which pays $85,852 this year, would be eliminated.
Some of his duties would go to other central-office administrators, and one of the district's nurses would be paid an extra $5,000 to handle other duties.
The savings in salary from all the moves would be about $53,000. Another $17,000 would be saved in benefits.
Schulte said the savings are not great in a budget of $110 million, "but I think it's important to look for savings wherever I can."


May 31, 2012 at 10:08 a.m.
Suggest removal
birdman;
I think you are cofusing this article with another. This article has nothing to do with principals. These are positions from E.S.C. Maybe you should read a little more before slamming people... Just sayin'.
God bless all :-)
May 31, 2012 at 9:57 a.m.
Suggest removal
""
Ezoner
May 31, 2012 at 8:30 a.m.
Suggest removal
With all the cost cutting -- these raises look really bad
""
I agree ezoner, wouldnt you say the EXACT same thing about Scott Walkers appointees raises some to the tune of 67%!! but I see no fake outrage from any of the zombies.
May 31, 2012 at 8:30 a.m.
Suggest removal
With all the cost cutting -- these raises look really bad. Schulte needs to get a clue. You cant cut teachers and turn around and do this. She opbviously needs to go. Time to clean house completely. I feel the cost reductions measures are required, but you cant then turn around and raise admin salaries for a select group.
May 31, 2012 at 7:31 a.m.
Suggest removal
birdman's got it right. The whole article is filled with obfuscations, confusing positions with personnel. What's really happening is these administrators are getting huge raises. The entire administrative apparatus, which has grown top-heavy in the last 30 years, should be entirely revamped. But we're only allowed to "save money" by cutting the salaries and benefits of teachers.
May 31, 2012 at 6:54 a.m.
Suggest removal
Let’s see, hmmm. Those three people are currently performing principal’s duties at a very good salary. Oh, and don’t forget a very generous insurance benefit package. VERY good.
. . .
But soon, with a stroke of a pen each of those soon-to-be-REAL principals will get an incredibly large salary increase. Same training. Same skill set. Boom! Huge raise. They will do nothing significantly more at their desk, but shazaam, each is mystically worth more.
. . .
‘Makes me want to scream. Schulte mouths platitudes about district fiscal woes, and then she does this!? I’d tell ‘em if they don’t like the situation, update their resumé and move on.
May 31, 2012 at 6:41 a.m.
Suggest removal
Are you an administrator for an entire school district? I wouldn't expect individuals with less education and less responsibilities to be paid as much as they are. Go ahead and vote Walker. He shares the same values about education as you do - all negative.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.