Wisconsin voters divided on bargaining
Reader poll
Photo
MILWAUKEE Talk about sharply divided voter attitudes in Wisconsin.
Those participating in Tuesday's election to recall Gov. Scott Walker were evenly split on the Republican-backed law that ended collective bargaining for state government workers — about half approved and half disapproved — and passionately divided on the GOP governor's handling of the issue.
About half also said they had a favorable opinion of unions for government workers, while just over 4 in 10 viewed them unfavorably.
Those were the key findings of preliminary exit polls conducted Tuesday for The Associated Press. The political world closely watched the recall election for signs of the electorate's mindset just five months before this presidential battleground weighs in on the White House race between President Barack Obama and Republican challenger Mitt Romney.
Elected governor in 2010, Walker angered Democrats and union members last year when, shortly after taking office, he signed legislation that effectively ended collective bargaining for public employees in Wisconsin. The Republican governor presented the measure as necessary to avoid wholesale layoffs, although opponents said it was simply a way of dividing public-sector unions from private unions to weaken labor's political clout in the traditionally strong union state.
Walker's push for the law prompted huge demonstrations on Madison's capital square as well as a successful petition drive last fall to recall Walker.
Yet, on Tuesday, most Wisconsin voters suggested the criteria for recalls should be tougher. There have only been three such elections in the nation's history, the most recent in 2003, when voters recalled Democratic California Gov. Gray Davis.
The vast majority of voters said recall elections should be allowed in at least some cases, though most feel they are appropriate only in cases of official misconduct.
"I just think the whole recall election was uncalled for and it was just a big waste of taxpayers' money," said Jeff Naunheim, 48, a warranty analyst from St. Francis who voted for Walker in the recall. "I don't think he did anything illegal. And if this is going to set the standard on how things are going to go in the future, it's going to be an ugly, divided mess."
Despite tens of millions of dollars in advertising, most voters decided on a candidate before the final ballots were even set. About 9 in 10 in early exit polling said they decided who to vote for before May, raising questions about the impact — if any — all that money for TV advertising had on the electorate.
The local union issue dominated the race, but the contest also provided clues about the presidential contest in an important battleground state.
Obama carried Wisconsin by a comfortable margin in 2008 en route to the White House. But a Walker victory would make the state more attractive to Romney as he seeks to do what no Republican has done since 1984 — carry the state in a presidential election.
The exit poll of 1,555 Wisconsin voters was conducted for The Associated Press by Edison Research in a random sample of 35 precincts statewide. Results for the full sample have a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 4 percentage points; it is higher for subgroups.


Jun 8, 2012 at 11:03 a.m.
Suggest removal
http://vocalminority.typepad.com/blog/20...
Jun 6, 2012 at 3:58 p.m.
Suggest removal
rprp
Huh???
"The public unions in Wisconsin are out of control and began controlling politicians to the point that average citizens were being fired, laid off and losing their homes etc."
Could you explain your statement above?
My memory is that it was mostly the WallStreet banksters who caused a financial crisis that spiralled down to mainstreet causing people to lose jobs and their homes.....aided by some unscrupulous mortgage lenders and some overreaching borrowers.
Or are we talking about two different things?
Jun 6, 2012 at 12:23 p.m.
Suggest removal
Act 10 had very little to do with my decision to vote against Walker. Other than the poor way in which is was delivered to us, I don't have many issues with it.
I think the way Walker handled the stimulus money, and the way he likes to sell public assets for short term gain are far greater problems for us long term.
The worst consequence of Act 10 for unions is that they will now be forced to adapt into something that will provide more value to their members. The only component that makes this "union-busting" is the GOP's realization that most of these Unions would rather die than change they way they do business.
If they were smart enough to adapt, within a few years they would be stronger than ever.
Jun 6, 2012 at 8:59 a.m.
Suggest removal
The public unions in Wisconsin are out of control and began controlling politicians to the point that average citizens were being fired, laid off and losing their homes etc., but you can also conclude that the politicians let them get that powerful. Now, lets get rid of the politicians that favor unions and let us not forget the most powerful union in Wisconsin is still at large, THE FARMERS UNION.
Jun 6, 2012 at 5:23 a.m.
Suggest removal
I think employees should always have the right to gather collectively. I think employers should always have the right to say, (in my cheezy Donald Trump seemingly fake eastern accent), YOUR FIRED!.
Jun 5, 2012 at 10:41 p.m.
Suggest removal
this election wasnt 100% about unions.... wake up wisconsin....
Jun 5, 2012 at 9:48 p.m.
Suggest removal
If the public truly had an understanding of the union and their tactics and how they protect under performing teachers, they might realize why unions are detrimental to education. People wouldn't believe the things the union complains about--having to work a minute or two over--and they used to be able to file a grievance. Those are the stories that the public needs to hear about.
Jun 5, 2012 at 9:29 p.m.
Suggest removal
helge thinks that in a market clearing economy, where 90+% of all positions are not unionized-that all of a sudden-companies will not offer fringe benefits as a condition of employment?
Heldge, benefits do not exist in a vacuum. Unskilled manual labor positions are not the high paying green-shovel ready fairytale jobs that people seek. Good paying, manufacturing jobs requiring skills will offer good, competitive wages, with benefits as long as the community business climate is competitive for capital-it goes hand in hand. If its not-companies will relocate to climates were the business climate supports and rewards risk and capital creation-not hyper regulated, protectionist legislation that pushes business away.
Jun 5, 2012 at 8:54 p.m.
Suggest removal
Oopsy. NBC just projects walker win. Nite, nite.
Jun 5, 2012 at 7:53 p.m.
Suggest removal
some want the right a to work law
You already have the right to work
The way walker & co. would have it you will work for a lot less with no benifits
But he will not work for less
Wake up
Jun 5, 2012 at 7:52 p.m.
Suggest removal
Yepperz, Ted!
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.