Obama's populist pitch unifies House Democrats

By ASSOCIATED PRESS   Friday, Jan. 27, 2012
ADVERTISEMENT
 

PhotoVideo


President Barack Obama speaks at Buckley Air Force Base, Colo., Thursday, Jan. 26, 2012.

President Barack Obama speaks at Buckley Air Force Base, Colo., Thursday, Jan. 26, 2012.

— President Barack Obama’s populist election-year pitch and middle-class message have unified House Democrats. The bitter divisions among Republican White House hopefuls have helped bring them together, too.

“Long may it last,” said Rep. Rob Andrews, D-N.J., on the prospect of a drawn-out, bare-knuckle GOP nomination fight between top candidates Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich.

House Democrats, who gathered for their annual three-day retreat on Maryland’s Eastern Shore, echoed many of the themes from Obama’s State of the Union speech on economic fairness, boosting manufacturing and helping middle-class Americans, a reflection of campaign messaging and a recognition that their fate is inextricably linked to the president. They held a series of closed-door sessions on strategy for the coming year and later spoke to reporters.

Obama and Vice President Joe Biden will address the group on Friday. It’s a more upbeat Democratic caucus than the one Obama encountered last year when backbiting and frustration split Democrats after a thrashing in the November 2010 midterm elections.

Being out of power for a year will do that. So will a week in which Democrats saw some positive signs, from Obama’s address to polls showing more voters think the country is on the right track, to a daring hostage rescue of an American in Somalia. Signs of an economic rebound are prevalent; Commerce Secretary John Bryson told the Democrats that of the 3 million new jobs, 300,000 were in manufacturing.

As for the Democrats’ own finances, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee raised more than $61 million last year and has $11.6 million cash on hand. It also eliminated a lingering debt.

“It’s the first time I’ve seen Democrats this united,” said Rep. Barbara Lee, D-Calif.

That unity will be tested by months of campaigning and legislative fights as well as clear signals from Obama that he will run against Congress.

While Democrats talked about message, Obama was on a three-day, five-state swing that included a stop in Aurora, Colo., where he told the crowd, “We’re not going to wait for Congress,” on some issues such as producing clean energy to power 3 million homes. He made similar arguments in his speech.

Democratic leaders said Obama should run against a “do-nothing Congress” to highlight for American voters how Republicans have obstructed his agenda. Yet that kind of campaign strategy could be equally damaging to Democrats, who hold 191 seats in the House and control the Senate by a narrow margin, 51-47, plus two independents who generally vote with them. Public approval ratings for Congress have hit all-time lows, dipping to the teens. Voters easily could send scores of members from both parties packing in November.

Republicans signaled they have a ready response to the White House strategy.

“The president can blame anyone he wants, but it won’t change the fact that this year will be a referendum on his economic record,” said Kevin Smith, a spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio.

For now, Democrats will press ahead with an agenda and rhetoric that mirrors Obama’s.

In his State of the Union speech, Obama called for requiring millionaires to pay at least 30 percent in taxes, the so-called Buffett rule, named after a recommendation by billionaire financier Warren Buffett, who benefits from a low 15 percent tax rate on investments, that he be required to pay a higher rate than his secretary. The president also pleaded for legislation that rewards companies that create jobs in the United States instead of shipping them overseas.

Senate Democrats said this week they will move ahead this year with legislation.

Obama also said he would sign a bill that would ban lawmakers from buying and selling stock based on insider information. Senate Democrats signaled they would consider a bill next week.

House Republicans, not Democrats, have the final say on what legislation comes to the floor. Still, House Democrats say the messaging is in sync.

“I think that’s led to a real spirit of optimism for the election,” Andrews said. “A realistic spirit but an optimistic one.”

Democrats face a tough challenge in recapturing the House as Republicans have shored up their vulnerable lawmakers through redistricting. The GOP scoffs at the notion that Democrats can win the 25 seats necessary to take control.

Still, in a sign of Democratic boldness, Rep. Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill., sported a button that said “Thanks Obamacare,” the derisive shorthand that Republicans use to describe the president’s overhaul of the health care system.

Schakowsky said there may come a time when “Obamacare might be up there with Social Security.”

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(14)
RetiredAirForce
Jan 28, 2012 at 12:14 a.m.
Suggest removal

germancaveguy the argument over the way Warren collects his income is false on its face. He chooses to take a small salary from his company and elects to take the remainder in gains. He does this specifically to pay less in taxes. He could take all his income via a salary but he doesn't want it that way. So instead he makes claims his percentage is less because of the way he collects it. If he wanted to he could take it all as an annual salary, to pay a higher rate he could, or he could voluntarily pay more. But again he decided to take the route he does because it costs him less. Is he following the law, yes. Is it wrong, legally no. But his and the often used talking point around the issue is very disingenuous.

Feduptaxpayer
Jan 27, 2012 at 7:56 p.m.
Suggest removal

Gag me with a spoon. He hasn't done anything but campaign and play golf and travel on luxury vacations for the past 3 years, and that is all he would do for another 4. Take that back, he would also most likely be successful in destroying our country.

theone
Jan 27, 2012 at 6:28 p.m.
Suggest removal

kaysbrew wrote..."The average federal government employee receives a salary of around $75,000 per year. With present and future fringe benefits equal to about 76 percent of salaries, that makes for total annual compensation of around $133,000."

Source please.

Ezoner
Jan 27, 2012 at 3:48 p.m.
Suggest removal

Dems are on a 4 yr vacation. You wont see this in the lame stream media..... where dems are on a 3 day vacation, while people are suffering, no jobs, no hope for businesses. I hope you are all proud of those dem leaders taking a break, while the people look for jobs.

cnw1313
Jan 27, 2012 at 3:06 p.m.
Suggest removal

Another one of Scotty Angus' "unbiased" AP articles?????

germancaveguy
Jan 27, 2012 at 1:49 p.m.
Suggest removal

kaysbrew -- The Warren Buffet scenario, as much as it gets portrayed as class warfare, isn't necessarily meant to be an attack on the rich. Too many people fail to see what a statement like Buffet's is trying to illustrate.

He isn't saying that the rich need to pay more in taxes. Instead, he is trying to point out that he is taxed less than most people because he is an investor. The key point here is that he gets treated preferentially because of his job title.

Many investors, like Warren Buffet, spend much of their time each day working. For this type of investor, their income isn't passive. They must take an active role, many times working more hours than others, to secure the returns they earn. In this regard, they are working for what they earn.

However, they are not taxed as if they are working. This is the problem Mr. Buffet speaks of. People with this type of occupation are taxed less then people with other occupations. Essentially, they get a break because of their job description.

A simple raise on the capital gains tax is likely not the solution. However, developing a way to differentiate those who invest passively from those who make a career out of it needs to happen. To not do so asks everyone else to contribute more simply because they have a different job description.

saxcat70
Jan 27, 2012 at 1:47 p.m.
Suggest removal

Carlitosway...find a different tree to bark up.

batmanb4robin
Jan 27, 2012 at 1:09 p.m.
Suggest removal

I almost feel like i'm living that stupid, "Dumb & dumber" movie.. or could it be the "Dumb leading the blind".. Was that ever a movie?... I don't know..

kaysbrew
Jan 27, 2012 at 12:14 p.m.
Suggest removal

The average federal government employee receives a salary of around $75,000 per year. With present and future fringe benefits equal to about 76 percent of salaries, that makes for total annual compensation of around $133,000. How does this match up to the private sector?

CNN Money has a nice survey of the 25 highest paying companies in the country, outlining the average total compensation per employee in each one. According to CNN, the closest match to federal employment is Microsoft, whose average employee compensation is 133,023 per year, making it the 17th highest paying company in the country.

Warren Buffet's secretary has two homes. And yet it's the liberal puppets that keep eating up the spoon fed class warfare slop

carlitosway
Jan 27, 2012 at 11:13 a.m.
Suggest removal

saxcat without unity it would be total insanity and to UNITE as the DEMs are is great as soon the puppets of the GOP that have heart will follow. OBAMA 2012..... His message was awesome and the 99% heard him

donnaw
Jan 27, 2012 at 11:03 a.m.
Suggest removal

A little biased reporting AP? Put your pom poms down!

saxcat70
Jan 27, 2012 at 10:35 a.m.
Suggest removal

a political party is unified. now that's news. I'd rather hear that they are not unified, as they would at least be thinking for themselves.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT