Legislature should restore funding to Focus on Energy
In spring 2011, Gov. Scott Walker and legislative leaders significantly cut funding to Focus on Energy, the energy efficiency program that helps residents and businesses lower energy bills. A recent legislative audit demonstrates that the benefits of Focus on Energy more than double the program’s costs, and legislators should quickly restore lost funding in order to maximize the program’s cost-saving potential.
Focus on Energy was created in 2001 to help homeowners and businesses reduce energy costs. More than 2 million Wisconsin residents and businesses have participated in the program.
The statewide program helps keep energy bills affordable for all Wisconsinites by reducing energy use and preventing the need to build expensive new power plants and transmission lines that we all pay for with increased electricity bills.
In addition, Focus on Energy helps reduce the amount of money we spend to fuel our power plants. Wisconsin spends $12.5 billion every year on imported electricity and dirty, out-of-state fossil fuels. Much of that is spent on coal, oil and natural gas to generate electricity and heat our homes. Investing in energy efficiency is the No. 1 way we can reduce that and keep money circulating within our own economy.
The audit released by the bipartisan Legislative Audit Bureau confirms that Focus on Energy successfully lowers energy bills and provides environmental and economic benefits that far outweigh program costs. For every $1 invested, residents and businesses save more than $2 on energy bills, according to the audit. This helped save more than $264 million on energy bills in 2010 alone. Since its inception, Focus on Energy has helped residents and businesses save more than $2 billion.
That’s a lot of money and reason enough to increase investment in the program, but it’s not the program’s only benefit. By reducing the need for coal-fired power plants, Focus on Energy helps improve air quality and protect our health. In fact, reduced power plant emissions resulted in more than $17 million in environmental benefits in 2010, according to the audit.
Finally, the audit acknowledges that Focus on Energy helps create jobs and increase business sales. An earlier study estimated that the funding cut from the program would create 7,000 to 9,000 new jobs in Wisconsin.
By voting to significantly cut funding for Focus on Energy last spring, legislators turned their backs on an opportunity to lower energy bills, reduce pollution and spur job creation. With the recent audit in hand, they now have the opportunity to remedy this mistake.
Legislators have begun circulating a bill that would restore the Public Service Commission’s ability to reinstate Focus on Energy funding. This bill is the first step on the path toward lower energy bills, and it deserves the support of our leaders.
By working to restore funding cut from Focus on Energy, our elected leaders can help residents and businesses save money, improve the quality of our environment and create more jobs. That’s something that deserves support from legislators on both sides of the aisle.
Keith Reopelle is senior policy director at Clean Wisconsin, the state’s largest environmental advocacy organization. Contact him at kreopelle@cleanwisconsin.org. Charlie Higley is executive director of the Citizens Utility Board of Wisconsin. Contact him at higley@wiscub.org.

Jan 29, 2012 at 4:36 a.m.
Suggest removal
With the EPA's new rules going into effect about the old out dated coal fired plants being closed down, people will be forced to conserve energy when their monthly energy bill goes up.
Wisconsin has three
coal-fired plants in Wisconsin at which federal regulators allege violations of the Clean Air Act but state regulators do not.
The EPA lists nine coal-fired power plants in Wisconsin as being "high-priority violators" of the Clean Air Act — sites that regulators believe are in urgent need of attention.
Retired/lower income Wisconsin citizens will need help paying their heat bills.
We all want clean air, but I need heat in the winter, and electricity that is affordable.
http://host.madison.com/ct/news/local/en...
Jan 27, 2012 at 11:06 a.m.
Suggest removal
Panama..you would think the article would have included some detail.
Jan 26, 2012 at 1:30 p.m.
Suggest removal
What, the Heritage Foundation website doesn't have that information donnaw?
Jan 25, 2012 at 6:58 a.m.
Suggest removal
What was the previous amount for this program and how much was cut?
Jan 25, 2012 at 2:30 a.m.
Suggest removal
The most important new source of energy is conservation. Focus on Energy actually saves us from building new power plants, which means we don't have to find coal or gas to run them (whether here or in Canada). Cutting funding for this program guarantees that Wisconsinites will be paying more for energy needs in the future.
Jan 24, 2012 at 10:41 a.m.
Suggest removal
Restore enery by not killing jobs with Keystone.
Even foreign countries are calling Obama a bone head. The Ultimate partisan one term confirmation move.
Good thing for us they have a plan around Obama's ideology.
Jan 24, 2012 at 10:33 a.m.
Suggest removal
Come on, Walker and fellow CONS, do the right thing for Wisconsin: Restore this funding.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.