Some former Komen supporters can't forgive, forget

By JOCELYN NOVECK   Sunday, Feb. 5, 2012
ADVERTISEMENT
 

PhotoVideo


In this Saturday, Oct. 16, 2010 file photo, some of an estimated 45,000 people participate in the Susan B. Komen Race for the Cure in Little Rock, Ark. After watching The Susan G. Komen for the Cure announce plans to cut funding to Planned Parenthood on Tuesday, Jan. 31, 2012, then abandon those plans days later amid a public furor, many longtime Komen supporters were feeling conflicted at week's end.

In this Saturday, Oct. 16, 2010 file photo, some of an estimated 45,000 people participate in the Susan B. Komen Race for the Cure in Little Rock, Ark. After watching The Susan G. Komen for the Cure announce plans to cut funding to Planned Parenthood on Tuesday, Jan. 31, 2012, then abandon those plans days later amid a public furor, many longtime Komen supporters were feeling conflicted at week's end.

— When Dorothy Twinney first saw a Race for the Cure walk for breast cancer — "a sea of pink" traveling through her hometown of Plymouth, Mich. — she was so moved she sat in her car and wept.

This week, after watching The Susan G. Komen for the Cure breast cancer charity announce plans to cut funding to Planned Parenthood, then abandon those plans amid a public furor, Twinney decided she was done with the organization for which she raised thousands of dollars on three-day, 60-mile walks that left her feet bloodied and blistered, but her spirits high.

"It just feels like it's all tarnished now," the 41-year-old mother of two said. "Honestly, I'm not sure what they can do to change that."

At week's end, many longtime Komen supporters were feeling similarly conflicted. Some, depending on where they stood on the hot-button issue of abortion, called it more of a betrayal. Those who supported Komen's grants to Planned Parenthood for breast-cancer screenings called the initial move to cut them politically motivated; those opposed to the grants said the same thing about the reversal.

The outrage clearly stunned Komen, the country's most widely known breast cancer organization. "I think (Komen) has been horrified to be so caught up in this culture war," said Eric Scheidler, executive director of the Chicago-based Pro-Life Action League.

Many women described feeling caught in the middle when The Associated Press first reported on Tuesday that Komen had adopted criteria excluding Planned Parenthood from future breast screening grants because it was the subject of an investigation launched by a Florida congressman at the urging of anti-abortion groups. The grants totaled $680,000 in 2011.

Alyce Lee-Walker was one of them. A longtime Komen supporter, she'd never given money to Planned Parenthood. But when she learned of the funding cut, she immediately went online to donate $188 — the 88 signifying good luck in Chinese.

She didn't stop there. The small business owner from Pinehurst, N.C., went about removing all the pink-ribbon stickers, a Komen symbol, that she'd affixed to her belongings.

"I took them off my personal car, the business car, off the doors in the office," she said. And that pink chef's knife she bought at Williams-Sonoma, with some of the proceeds going to Komen? "I'm done with that, too," she said.

When she worked on Wall Street, Lee-Walker once prowled the trading floor soliciting donations "from anyone who loved a sister, mother, wife — or who was a fan of breasts," she quips. She raised $15,000. But now, Komen's reversal as well as its original move left her disgusted, she said: "It's all political."

Many shared that skepticism. "I'm wondering, is this really what they believe now, or is it just all the bad press that made them do it?" asked Mary Gauvin, a 27-year-old mother from Fort Drum, N.Y. "I doubt their motivation a bit."

Gauvin, a supporter in the past of both Planned Parenthood and Komen, said that now, if a friend asked for sponsorship in a Race for the Cure event, she would offer to give money instead to the American Cancer Society.

Also switching allegiance was Suzanne Strempek Shea, a novelist and college writing teacher in Northampton, Mass. "If someone asks me to sponsor them," she said, "I'm going to say, 'I wish you well, but I'm going to give the amount I'd have given you to Rays of Hope," another breast cancer support group.

The issue was particularly painful to Shea, 51. She is a breast cancer survivor who discovered early warning signs at a Planned Parenthood breast screening (the group does screenings and refers some patients for mammograms).

"They found the cysts that led to the diagnosis. I don't think people realize all the good they do," Shea said. Horrified that a crucial women's health issue had become entwined with the abortion debate, she said that despite the reversal, "I'm still angry."

Even angrier about the reversal were anti-abortion advocates who'd applauded Komen's original move.

"We were very happy to see (Komen) discontinue funding to Planned Parenthood," said Tony Lauinger, state chairman for Oklahomans For Life. "For an entity ... that's trying to prevent breast cancer across the world, it's directly counterproductive that the organization would be giving funds to Planned Parenthood, which is the largest provider of abortions in the country."

Scheidler, of the Pro-Life Action League, sent out emails and social media messages Friday aimed at "tens of thousands" of abortion foes, urging them to withhold donations to Komen. Days earlier, when the original decision was reported, he'd urged people to donate to Komen.

Renee Wiesner, a mother of nine who opposes abortion, said she had been encouraged by Komen's original decision.

"I had known about the grants, and that's why I had avoided supporting Komen in the past," said Wiesner, of Aurora, Ill. Now, she said, she will wait for the furor to die down before deciding where to contribute.

She said she suspected the reversal was simply a PR move by Komen: "They need to keep a good public image if they want to be as successful as they've been."

Not everyone was beating up on Komen. "They made a bad call, but they rethought their position," said Katie Ferdinand, 46, of Basking Ridge, N.J. "I'd consider supporting them going forward."

Before the reversal, Ferdinand had gone on Facebook and urged friends to join her in contributing to Planned Parenthood. The organization said it received $3 million between Tuesday evening and Friday afternoon, funds it said would be used to expand its breast health services, which now provide nearly 750,000 breast exams each year.

That made Planned Parenthood supporter Cindy Froggatt happy. "I am grateful to Komen for the unintended consequence of their misguided decision," said Froggatt, of Philadelphia. She especially admired the actions of New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who himself made a $250,000 gift.

The controversy was rawest, it seemed, for breast cancer survivors, especially those, like Joyce Miller, who'd donated many hours of time to Komen. After her first breast cancer treatment, Miller spent an hour a day manning Komen's phone lines, for nearly two years.

"I do not forgive them," the 70-year-old Dallas woman said Friday, after the reversal. She said she was also thinking of her daughter, Twinney, the Michigan woman, who spent years on the breast cancer walks. "Those bloody feet," Miller said. "The aching back!"

As for Twinney, she didn't try to hold back the tears as she spoke of the years of fundraising, which included bartending stints to get cash together, and the three-day walks, buoyed by supporters including her two sons, who even agreed to dress in pink.

"Those weekends, on those walks, were some of the most special times of my life, next to the birth of my children," she said. "You met the best people in the world. This organization began for such a special reason. And I am just so disappointed right now."

___

Associated Press writers Carla K. Johnson in Chicago and Justin V. Juozapavicius in Tulsa, Okla., contributed to this report.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(13)
ms_sassy_wi
Feb 8, 2012 at 10:08 p.m.
Suggest removal

I have nothing to base this on, but I wouldn't be ALL that surprised if there isn't some hidden cure already discovered, but the pharmaceutical companies know that they wouldn't be able to keep us over the barrel, so to speak...it's been rumored to be there, but nothing has leaked out yet. I would bet the key word in that sentence is "yet". Medicine is HUGE business. You don't have to look too far until you discover a survivor (or victim) of cancer. Sounds crass, but why find a cure when they can stay in everyone's pockets to the degree that they are??? https://www.inspire.com/groups/ovarian-c... Not really on topic, sorry....but I don't think legalized abortion is the reason our country is in its current state, nor do I believe "unwanted" babies (that is: crack addicted, fetal alcohol syndrome affected, etc) would have the opportunity to go to college, earn a doctorate, have "lab time" or be given the encouragement necessary to not be a burden on society, let alone find the cure for cancer or HIV. And as long as a woman has the uterus, woman shall decide what is best for that uterus (and all that enters and exits). Furthermore, I think men who are fighting that women have this right need to sit back and think of all the ways this is "a man's world"...this should not be an issue that YOU get to control for ME. Thanks.

WalterReuther
Feb 5, 2012 at 9:52 p.m.
Suggest removal

Roe v. Wade 1973
18 years later crime begins to take a sharp dive.
Unwanted pregnancies often led to unwanted children who were much more apt to commit crime. Legalized abortion led to a significant decrease that began in the early 90's, the time when the babies that would have been born had abortion remained illegal would have been entering their peak crime committing years.
A massive crime boom had been predicted throughout the mid to late 1980's because of the upward trend in gang activity and other crime related to the crack epidemic of the 80s. That massive crime boom never happened. The opposite happened, and crime has remained at the lower levels ever since. Right or wrong, legalized abortion led to lower crime rates.

nemesis
Feb 5, 2012 at 7:55 p.m.
Suggest removal

Using your logic, smallbizowner, how do you know that we haven't already aborted the doctor who could have developed the cure for cancer or HIV...?

smallBIZowner
Feb 5, 2012 at 7:12 p.m.
Suggest removal

To a certain extent, you should be in favor of abortions if you want to lower the unemployment rate for future generations.

justBnice
Feb 5, 2012 at 6:45 p.m.
Suggest removal

I rotate my charitable contributions every year. I hope my charities don't bad-mouth me for giving one year then not giving the next year.

studs
Feb 5, 2012 at 6:30 p.m.
Suggest removal

Women have the uteruses, so they have the choice. And, I don't see the right wing offering to give them reasonably priced health care; in fact, Romney doesn't care about the poor.

ImJustSayin
Feb 5, 2012 at 4:30 p.m.
Suggest removal

I'm glad there was so much backlash, and PPOA now has more money then ever. I made my first contribution last week, and I'll continue to donate each year along with The Freedom From Religion Association, and the Nation Center for Science Education. I fight religiosity wherever I smell it festering.

nemesis
Feb 5, 2012 at 4:07 p.m.
Suggest removal

MS SASSY - it's ironic that you use the term "chance at life" because when an abortion procedure is used someone gets that life denied. Oh yeah PP also hands out birth control pills and free condoms.
http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2011...

ms_sassy_wi
Feb 5, 2012 at 3:44 p.m.
Suggest removal

here here, WalterReuther! PP does SO much more for women than "do abortions"...btw: women who can't afford insurance because it is too expensive get a chance at life. Isn't that what all the "pro-lifers" want????????????????????????

WalterReuther
Feb 5, 2012 at 3:18 p.m.
Suggest removal

Many people that scream against PP and any group that contributes money to PP because of abortion services provided are the same people that scream for defunding of social programs that provide for the welfare of children. I guess some people are concerned for a child as long as it's in the womb, but once it's out, all bets are off.
As for SGK, they should take some time to figure out what they really stand for as an organization: women's health or petty partisan politics.

poorrichard
Feb 5, 2012 at 2:44 p.m.
Suggest removal

How many women who might get breast cancer in the future won't get it now because they will have been aborted by PP with the cash from SGK.
I guess thats one way to do it.

nemesis
Feb 5, 2012 at 12:21 p.m.
Suggest removal

I guess bullying from the advocates of PP in the media and from those in the left wing government does work. But remember, PP does breast exams - nowhere in this story do they say they do mammograms. Oh, yeah and they do abortions.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT