Fiscal cliff efforts ongoing, Boehner offers plan
Photo
WASHINGTON President Barack Obama and House Speaker John Boehner pushed ahead on negotiating a broad deal to avert the "fiscal cliff," even as the GOP leader readied a backup plan Tuesday to pressure the White House with little time left to avoid a double hit on the economy.
With exactly two weeks to automatic tax hikes and spending cuts, Boehner offered a measure, dubbed "plan B," that would cancel tax increases due to take effect Jan. 1 on everyone earning $1 million or less, while allowing tax increases on those earning more than that amount.
Boehner insisted that his plan would address the burgeoning deficits and that the president has failed to produce a balance plan in weeks of post-election negotiations.
But the speaker's alternative was a non-starter with the White House and Democrats, and perhaps more damaging to its prospects, got a frosty reception from rank-and-file House Republicans in a morning closed-door meeting.
"The president is willing to continue to work with Republicans to reach a bipartisan solution that averts the fiscal cliff, protects the middle class, helps the economy, and puts our nation on a fiscally sustainable path," White House spokesman Jay Carney said. "But he is not willing to accept a deal that doesn't ask enough of the very wealthiest in taxes and instead shifts the burden to the middle class and seniors."
GOP aides said the leadership strategy is to pass the alternative plan in the House and send it to the Senate. There, Republicans would use their clout to block Democratic alternatives.
Even as he offered his alternative plan, Boehner indicated that negotiations with Obama continue on avoiding the fiscal cliff. Economists inside and outside the government have warned that the combination of spending cuts and tax hikes could stall a weak recovery and threaten a new recession.
"I continue to have hope that we can reach a broader agreement with the White House" that would cancel the tax increases and spending cuts now poised to begin in early January, Boehner, R-Ohio, told reporters.
But he said when it comes to offering a package that balances tax increases with spending cuts, "The president is not there yet."
Boehner presented his alternative to his GOP caucus, which reacted coolly to any plan that includes an increase in the tax rate. Conservatives and tea partyers signaled that Boehner faces a tough time rounding up the votes.
"I think it's a terrible idea," said Rep. Raul Labrador, R-Idaho. "For a lot of reasons."
When asked whether there was enough support among fellow Republicans to pass it, Labrador said, "I do not."
Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, said he is in favor of preventing tax hikes for as many taxpayers as possible, but he's not ready to support Boehner's plan.
"I didn't see enough specificity to support it," Chaffetz said.
Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio, the outgoing chairman of the conservative Republican Study Committee, said, "I'm not doing cartwheels over it, that's for sure."
Jordan said Boehner's plan crosses a dangerous line by enacting higher tax rates for anyone.
"I think it's a mistake for the Republican Party, so that's what I think a lot of members are struggling with," said the Ohio Republican.
In the Senate, Democratic Leader Harry Reid said the Boehner plan could not pass and urged the speaker to work out an agreement with the president.
"Now is the time to show leadership, not kick the can down the road," Reid said. "Speaker Boehner should focus his energy on forging a large-scale deficit reduction agreement. It would be a shame if Republicans abandoned productive negotiations due to pressure from the tea party, as they have time and again."
In addition to allowing a tax increase for million-dollar earners, the Boehner plan would prevent an expansion of the alternative minimum tax that would otherwise hit 28 million middle- and upper-class Americans with an average $3,700 increase on their 2012 tax returns.
The plan also would extend the current maximum 35 percent tax rate on inheritance, exempting the first $5 million. That tax rate is slated to rise to 55 percent on Jan. 1, with only a $1 million exemption.
Under the plan, the automatic, across-the-board spending cuts of $1.09 trillion to domestic and defense programs would go into effect.
Boehner said GOP efforts to cull savings from Medicare by increasing the eligibility age from 65 to 67 could wait until next year. That source of savings had been an important demand from Republicans earlier in Boehner's negotiations with the White House.
Boehner aides said the call for a separate tax bill does not mean the Republican is cutting off negotiations with Obama on averting the full slate of tax hikes and spending cuts due to take effect next year. Obama and Boehner have each made significant concessions in recent days, signaling a new stage in the negotiations.
Boehner's latest move is an attempt to give Republicans political cover if Washington fails to reach a deal before the end of the year and taxes increase on all income earners.
In the negotiations, the president has dropped his long-held insistence that taxes rise on individuals earning more than $200,000 and families making more than $250,000. He is now offering a new threshold of $400,000 and lowering his 10-year tax revenue goals from the $1.6 trillion he had argued for a few weeks ago.
Obama and Boehner met privately at the White House on Monday, and then spoke again on the phone later that night. Boehner huddled with House GOP members on Capitol Hill Tuesday morning to discuss the status of the talks and review Obama's latest offer.
"We have to stop whatever tax rate increases we can," Boehner said in the meeting, according to prepared remarks released by an aide. "In the absence of an alternative, as of this morning, a "modified Plan B" is the plan."
Unless Congress acts, tax rates will increase on all income earners on Jan. 1. Boehner first opposed raising rates on any income earners, including the wealthiest Americans, but agreed on Friday to accept an increase in tax rates for taxpayers who earn more than $1 million. Boehner's plan would raise about $1 trillion in taxes over 10 years.
In return, Obama also abandoned his demand for permanent borrowing authority. Instead, he is now asking for a new debt limit that would last two years, putting its renewal beyond the politics of a 2014 midterm election.
And in a move sure to create heartburn among some congressional Democrats, Obama is proposing lower cost-of-living increases for Social Security beneficiaries, employing an inflation index that would have far-reaching consequences, including pushing more people into higher income tax brackets.
Those changes, as well as Obama's decision not to seek an extension of a temporary payroll tax cut, would force higher tax payments on the middle class, a wide swath of the population that Obama has repeatedly said he wanted to protect from tax increases.
As public posturing has given way to pragmatism, both sides still seem willing to lock in on a substantial agreement rather than just putting off a fiscal day of reckoning. To that end, Obama has conceded that a big bargain would require giving up some of his proposals.
"I understand that I don't expect the Republicans simply to adopt my budget," he said during his post-election news conference last month. "That's not realistic. So, I recognize we're going to have to compromise."
Despite signs of progress, there are still plenty of disputes to iron out. And people familiar with Obama's proposal were careful not to describe it as his final offer.
The Obama plan seeks $1.2 trillion in revenue over 10 years and $1.2 trillion in 10-year spending reductions. Boehner aides say the revenue is closer to $1.3 trillion if revenue triggered by the new inflation index is counted, and they say the spending reductions are closer to $930 billion if one discounts about $290 billion in lower estimated debt interest.
Associated Press writers Alan Fram, Andrew Taylor, Stephen Ohlemacher and Donna Cassata contributed to this report.

Dec 20, 2012 at 9:22 a.m.
Suggest removal
fordfan, if you really think that tax cuts across the board put us in this boat you really need to open your eyes. The prosperity of the 90's had little to do with the tax rates, we had a huge growth in many private sectors of the economy which were not dependent on government assistance. The very fact that Clinton and GOP congress were able to balance the budget and work together rather than display the behavior the current crop of clowns has also contributed to the 90's prosperity. Until they are willing to seriously look at spending and working on bringing the debt down, throwing out the tax 'reason' will always grab enough casual observers to garner support. When you are spending 43% of all revenue just to maintain the debt that is a losing situation, one that taking more money out of the private sector will never cure.
Dec 20, 2012 at 8:56 a.m.
Suggest removal
for all of the people wanting to go over the fiscal cliff.....I guess you now realize that the Bush tax cuts were a BAD thing since this will put us back into the Clinton tax rates. Finally some roundabout logic from the right......well, maybe not.
Dec 20, 2012 at 8:23 a.m.
Suggest removal
westorbust..I'll try to be charitable by just saying the density of folks like you is just incomprehensible. 16 TRILLION DOLLARS!!.."we don't have a debt problem..outdated economic system.." The arrogance of those statements are mind-boggling..what will economic "experts" like you say when our entire federal budget is consumed by interest on our debt?Nothing left for your beloved social programs..or defense of our country.
Once again, we have a financial cancer growing on our country..and the greedy and arrogant mindset of you and your liberal ilk are feeding it and nourishing it. God help us.
Dec 19, 2012 at 9:32 p.m.
Suggest removal
Actually donnaw, going over the "fiscal cliff" will solve our deficit program, but will do so through austerity. The fact is, we don't have a debt problem, we have an unemployment problem. Tax receipts are low and unemployment is high, but austerity measures will not grow the economy. It hasn't worked in Europe, it won't work here. It never has.
Franky, the idea that our tax revenue needs to match our spending is based on out dated economic systems, like the gold standard. We have a fiat system, and as such, does not apply, but I know that doesn't stoke the fires of paranoia and collapse. We have some serious issues, that is certain, but they are all fixable.
Dec 19, 2012 at 6:19 a.m.
Suggest removal
Those people in D C # 1 Have to stop giving money to other countrys # 2 cut their own wages & benefits along with all the perks I do not think they can see past their own pockets
They really do not care about us
That is both partys
Dec 19, 2012 at 5:57 a.m.
Suggest removal
I know I posted this on another article but it makes me sick. Congress is working on a bill to send aid to the victims of Sandy but a great part of the bill is funding for pork projects that have nothing to do with Sandy victims! Fisheries in Alaska, etc. So you see the problem? "What's in it for me!" Attitude. We are in a deep deep hole and they still keep spending! Obama has never had a budget passed by his guys in the senate! For every $1 we take in, we spend $2.06. We can't keep going like this. Govt is too big. I hope we go over the cliff to get some sense knocked into our congress and admin.
Dec 19, 2012 at 3:08 a.m.
Suggest removal
The problem is Reid. He stops everything before it goes to the Senate floor. The House has given the Senate many bills but Reid stops it so it can't be discussed by the Senate. He's the problem and needs to retire. Obama needs to shove his arrogance and ego where the sun doesn't shine and get serious!! If Obama doesn't stop all his spending, all the tax increases in the world will not put a dent in the debt or deficit. Obama is clueless when it comes to finances. I bet he can't even balance his checkbook. Republicans have given Obama "Plan B" and he scoffs at it. What kind of leader is that?? Answer: A Very Poor One!!!
Dec 19, 2012 at 1:19 a.m.
Suggest removal
I believe I called this outcome well over a month ago. Much like Obama's re-election I will be proven correct on this. In that a meaningless compromise will be made. The spineless pukes of the GOP will of course FOLD. A token will be passed, where both claim it has flaws, but all will pad each other on the back for "saving" America from total devastation, LOL. Theses self glorifying, wind bags, will all run out claiming what great work they did for the American people to save them from the cliff...All the while the deficits and debt CONTINUES to EXPLODE, and the total economic implosion is just kicked a ways down the road....YET AGAIN
Dec 18, 2012 at 11:05 p.m.
Suggest removal
Only delusionists think raising taxes will fix this nation's problems. For those not schooled in our nation's history in the late 50's and early 60's the highest tax rates were OVER 90%. During that time our nation still had a deficit and increased the national debt. The last time the national debt went DOWN was the mid 50's...over 60 years ago.
For over 6 decades we have been kicking the can down the road while expanding entitlements....all increasing spending. Doing more of the same is not a fix.
Dec 18, 2012 at 10:41 p.m.
Suggest removal
Our illustrious government will at the last minute, kick the can down the road. Both side will claim victory for their sides. Then we will spend the next 12 months listening to the blame and shame game, nothing gets done and we just go deeper in debt. We elected cowards to Congress. We expected them to do the job. They are more worried about getting re-elected then resolving any problems for once a problem is solved they have to create another problem to replace it.
Dec 18, 2012 at 7:37 p.m.
Suggest removal
We are increasing our debt by 6 Billion dollars per day...6 BILLION PER DAY!!!
We are hurtling toward the point where interest on our national debt will consume our gross domestic output.
This is a financial cancer on our counry...and liberal democrats are nourishing and feeding it.
Dec 18, 2012 at 7:20 p.m.
Suggest removal
916WI - Yep! Over 50% of the population is drinking the Kool Aid and doesn't want to face the facts that we continue to spend money we don't have and as long as we get 1+ whatever Trillion over the next ten years in tax increases everything will be just fine because they said so!
Dec 18, 2012 at 6:44 p.m.
Suggest removal
This country needs to go over the cliff. Tax increases across the board with serious cuts necessary to finally start dealing with reality. As it stands now, we can correlate this situation to someone with wages of $100,000 a year, who spends $200,000 year, jumping up and down saying now everything is alright because they received an $8,000/yr raise! Are the American people really stupid enough to buy into this?
Dec 18, 2012 at 5:35 p.m.
Suggest removal
Republicans and Democrats are the problem, until we can get rid of them, forget it.
Dec 18, 2012 at 5:29 p.m.
Suggest removal
It's nice to see the level headed folks are already surfacing after they read their book!
Dec 18, 2012 at 5:13 p.m.
Dec 18, 2012 at 5:06 p.m.
Suggest removal
Are you kidding GoodAmerican, at least the Tea party people would actually cut spending which is what the real problem is. This is all just phony non sense, we will be way over 20 trillion in debt when Obama leaves office.
Dec 18, 2012 at 4:38 p.m.
Suggest removal
America is not learning anything by watching Europe. We are headed to problems like Greece.
Dec 18, 2012 at 4:14 p.m.
Suggest removal
Let's call this what it is... kicking the can down the road... again. $1.2 trillion over 10 years on both revenue and cuts? that is laughable. We are screwed, the quicker we all face it and prepare the better we will be, good thing government keeps getting bigger, the people running it are so wise and intelligent.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.