Boehner: 'Serious differences' remain in talks
Photo
This Nov. 16, 2012 file photo shows President Barack Obama, accompanied by House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio, speaking to reporters in the Roosevelt Room of the White House in Washington. Even if Congress and the White House fail to strike a budget deal by New Year's Day, reality may be a lot less bleak then the scenario that's been spooking employers and investors and slowing the U.S. Economy. The tax increases and spending cuts could be retroactively repealed after Jan.
WASHINGTON House Speaker John Boehner said Wednesday that "serious differences" remain between him and President Barack Obama in negotiations on averting automatic spending cuts and tax increases that economists say could send the U.S. economy over a "fiscal cliff."
Boehner's comments came as top Democrats pushed back on GOP demands for tough steps such as raising the Medicare eligibility age and curbing the cost-of-living adjustment for Social Security.
Boehner and Obama spoke on the phone Tuesday, a day after the president offered to reduce his initial demand for $1.6 trillion in higher tax revenue over a decade to $1.4 trillion. But Obama continues to insist that much of the revenue come from raising top tax rates on the wealthy.
Boehner countered later Tuesday with another offer that GOP aides said stuck close to a document delivered to the White House a week ago. A top White House aide, Rob Nabors, came to the Capitol to respond. A Democratic official said Boehner's counter-offer included permanent extension of Bush-era tax rates for all taxpayers including the top 2 percent of earners, the same as his earlier proposal. Boehner offers $800 billion in new revenues through a tax reform measure next year. The officials spoke only on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to describe the private talks.
Boehner on Wednesday offered a sour assessment less than three weeks before the cliff deadline. The changes would strike the economy with $500 billion worth of spending cuts and higher tax rates if left in place through September.
"There were some offers that were exchanged back and forth yesterday and the president and I had pretty frank conversations about just how far apart we are," the Ohio Republican said after a closed-door meeting with fellow GOP lawmakers in which he advised them not to make plans for the week after Christmas.
Leading lawmakers expressed pessimism that a deal was close, despite increasing angst about a Dec. 31 deadline to stop the expiration of Bush-era tax cuts and separate across-the-board spending cuts that are the result of Washington's failure to complete a deficit-reduction deal last year.
"I think it's getting worse, not better," House GOP Whip Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., said.
Obama met Wednesday with nine mayors from around the country and spoke to more on a conference call about the fiscal cliff. Following the meeting, the mayors said it was important for Congress to come to agreement with the White House on a "balanced approach."
Columbus, Ohio, Mayor Michael Coleman said he did not "detect frustration" in Obama during the meeting. "But I can tell you that we're frustrated, and I think America is becoming frustrated. I think those in Ohio are becoming frustrated and those in Columbus are becoming frustrated because it seems this can be done, that we can forge an agreement with Congress that will result in tax cuts for the middle class."
The Boehner camp again said it's up to the White House to proffer additional spending cuts to programs like Medicare. The White House countered that Republicans still need to cave on raising tax rates for the rich.
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, meanwhile, warned Republicans against insisting on raising the Medicare eligibility age as part of any deal.
"One of the things that we object to is raising the Medicare age," Pelosi said on "CBS This Morning." ''Don't go there."
Pelosi said raising the retirement age wouldn't contribute much savings toward an agreement, adding "Is it just a trophy that the Republicans want to take home?"
Raising the Medicare age from 65 to 67 could cut Medicare costs by $162 billion over a decade, according to a Congressional Budget Office estimate last year. But by 2035, it would cut Medicare's projected budget by 7 percent.
Democrats also pushed back against a GOP plan to reduce Social Security COLAs. That's a step back from talks between Obama and Boehner 18 month ago in which Obama considered the lower COLA.
"Quite frankly, Social Security is off the table," said Rep. Joe Crowley, D-N.Y.
But in an ABC interview Tuesday, Obama did not reject a Republican call to raise the age of Medicare eligibility from 65 to 67, a proposal many Democrats strongly oppose.
The proposal is "something that's been floated," Obama said, not mentioning that he had tacitly agreed to it in deficit-reduction talks with Boehner more than a year ago that ended in failure.
"When you look at the evidence, it's not clear that it actually saves a lot of money," Obama said. "But what I've said is, let's look at every avenue, because what is true is we need to strengthen Social Security, we need to strengthen Medicare for future generations, the current path is not sustainable because we've got an aging population and health care costs are shooting up so quickly."
The White House, for its part, detailed numerous proposals Obama has made to cut spending, including recommendations to cull $340 billion from Medicare over a decade and an additional $250 billion from other government benefit programs.
Obama remains determined that tax rates rise on family income exceeding $250,000, a move Republicans say would strike many small businesses that are engines of new jobs and file as individuals when paying their taxes.
Two weeks before the year-end holidays, time to find agreement was short, but not prohibitively so.
"I think it's going to be extremely difficult to get it done before Christmas, but it could be done," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said.
Democrats have watched with satisfaction in recent days as Republicans struggle with Obama's demands to raise taxes, but Reid privately has told his rank and file they could soon be feeling the same distress if discussions grow serious on cuts to benefit programs.
Obama's plan would raise $1.6 trillion in revenue in part by raising tax rates on incomes over $200,000 for individuals and $250,000 for couples. He has recommended $400 billion in spending cuts over a decade.
He also is seeking extension of the Social Security payroll tax cut due to expire Jan. 1, a continuation in long-term unemployment benefits and steps to help hard-pressed homeowners and doctors who treat Medicare patients.
The White House summary noted that Obama last year signed legislation to cut more than $1 trillion from government programs over a decade, and was proposing $600 billion in additional savings from benefit programs.
Boehner's plan, in addition to calling for $800 billion in new revenue, envisions $600 billion in savings over a decade from Medicare, Medicaid and other government health programs, as well as $300 billion from other benefit programs and another $300 billion from other domestic programs.

Dec 13, 2012 at 9:14 a.m.
Suggest removal
Kio -- on the taxing and accounting avoidance. I totally agree. Dems and far left liberals react -- they do what feels and looks right without thinking it through. If they think for a minute, that the people with money will just pay more, they are complete idiots. It has been like this for many many years and it will not change. The only people that get hurt are teh very ones the left says they are helping. The cry to the government -- PLEASE QUIT HELPING ME -- IT HURTS TOO MUCH.
Dec 13, 2012 at 6:22 a.m.
Suggest removal
The minute someone says something is "off the table", they should be "out the door". Get a grip, people! There are no "sacred cows" here anymore. Everything is fair game and should be so.
Dec 13, 2012 at 6:12 a.m.
Suggest removal
The Republicans are once AGAIN acting like a bunch of crying babies that don't have a clue. Especially the fake tears of one...
"JOHN BOEHNER'S BABY MAMAS"
http://www.laprogressive.com/john-boehne...
"THE TEARS OF JOHN BOEHNER ARE LIKE ACID TO FREEDOM"
http://reason.com/blog/2010/11/04/the-te...
Dec 13, 2012 at 5:53 a.m.
Suggest removal
Other than raising taxes on the RICH what is the additional "revenue" for? Its not to reduce the deficit - its not to pay down our debt - its for Obama to spend more on government give-aways. Where is Obama's budget plan? He doesn't have one. He hasn't had one in four years.
Dec 13, 2012 at 3:53 a.m.
Suggest removal
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/15/world/...
I'll find the link w/bbc which talks about how they're making their way from their to Afghanistan. This upsets me we're so broke but yet we give all this money to other countries. Stop the spending already!!
Dec 13, 2012 at 3:49 a.m.
Suggest removal
"19 days and counting this one will come down to the wire any bets this wont get done."
.
The markets are betting HEAVILY that it will get done. It's why you see all US markets going up the last few weeks. The majority of the public thinks nothing will get done, but the people with real $$, and LOTS of it, are betting it will get done. As I have said for weeks, there will be a totally meaningless compromise soon. Minor tax increases on the upper income earners, minor spending cuts in some areas, all which do NOTHING to reduce the accumulation of debt. It will end up being the SAME thing we have done for years now.
.
The last election saw NOTHING CHANGE. President was re-elected, all of congress stayed pretty much the same (dem vs rep seats). Consequently the out come of this will remain the SAME. In that we just continue to borrow and print $$, and KICK THE CAN DOWN THE ROAD, and or let the fed solve it through monetary creationism. This should be a very easy game theory type analysis.
Dec 13, 2012 at 3:49 a.m.
Suggest removal
That is link for one shipment to libya looking for link to most recent one to syria..
Dec 13, 2012 at 3:46 a.m.
Suggest removal
here is article:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/06/world/...
I saw it on 12/4 issue ny times front page lower right hand corner. And to think democrats criticized Bush for this back in 90's. Isn't it interesting how the most appealing stories get hidden while we hear about space launches, dirty cities, romney lie of the year, etc..
Dec 13, 2012 at 3:40 a.m.
Suggest removal
Mouse:
That is a funy post. What you fail to realize is that guys like that don't even have income. Much of what they have is wealth, which has all ready been taxed. What they make upon that wealth is capital gains, which of course is taxed at a far less rate (15% right now). The left, of course says, to simply raise capital gains. An idea which would hit them, but also many smaller, retired people, who live on fixed incomes. While anytime you do tax the like you speak of, with some crazy idea, all they do is find a way around it. The whole industry of accounting is yet ANOTHER multi BILLION $$ government welfare industry. As good accountants make millions for finding ways around government loop holes in the THOUSANDS of pages of tax code. The only people who truly get hit by higher rates are those who can't afford a multi million $ tax accountant.
Dec 13, 2012 at 3:31 a.m.
Suggest removal
@helge AMEN! I saw on New York Times front page last week a bunch of arms intended for rebels in Syria were taken by terrorists. On Thursday I shared a flight to San Diego with a platoon full of Marines. It's nice to know all those weapons which came from our tax dollars will be aimed at them!
Dec 13, 2012 at 1:27 a.m.
Suggest removal
Of course liberal Americans will blame the Republicans because the mainstream media doesn't report on how the president and/or Democrats are not offering substantial spending cuts. All the mainstream media does is bash the Republicans and how they won't compromise. Democrats need to compromise too. You can tax the wealthy until your blue in the face but if you do not have comparable spending cuts, you still have financial chaos. People need to understand they won't get the correct information from the mainstream media because they're in the tank for Obama. Obama should be on Sen. Reid's case for stopping every House bill from going to the Senate floor for debate. But no, he won't do that to his own party. Leadership? Non-existent.
Dec 12, 2012 at 10:37 p.m.
Suggest removal
The problem here is neither side wants to bend because of the politics of the republican and democratic parties. Each time this has happened the middle class always got screwed while our politicians sit on their ***** and continue to argue back and fourth. I for one am sick and tired of it. If this is not done in 19 days a lot of good middle and poor class people will be ruined and it will be no one's fault other than the politicians of BOTH parties.
Dec 12, 2012 at 9:21 p.m.
Suggest removal
The serious differences is, Congress has no specified plan. Boehner has no control over the the circus.
Dec 12, 2012 at 8:36 p.m.
Suggest removal
The "serious differences" are named Mitch McConnell, John Boehner, Lindsay Graham and Paul Ryan. Call or email them to tell them to get this done.
Dec 12, 2012 at 7:50 p.m.
Suggest removal
Some insiders are saying that if Boehner doesn't get his House in order, the President will start to punish him for dragging his heels and the next offer will have even higher rates for those that earn $1 million/year (42%) and $10 million/year (45%). I say let's do this. The Republicans want to talk about how they're going to force the country to default on it's debt during the next debt ceiling debate if they have to give on taxes now. Please. They'll cave on the cliff AND the debt ceiling just like they did before.
Dec 12, 2012 at 4:46 p.m.
Suggest removal
Sure would be nice if those in washington could see that giving all those other countrys money is what needs to stop
Before they take away from us
Dec 12, 2012 at 4:04 p.m.
Suggest removal
19 days and counting this one will come down to the wire any bets this wont get done.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.