Whitewater OKs concealed carry rule

By KEVIN HOFFMAN   Wednesday, Sept. 28, 2011
ADVERTISEMENT
 

— Gun owners hoping to take advantage of the state’s concealed carry law this fall could face hefty fines if caught bringing firearms into Whitewater’s public buildings.

The city council passed an ordinance Tuesday banning guns inside a number of buildings in an effort to “promote the health, safety and general welfare” of the community. It also heard the first draft of an amendment that would levy fines of up to $300 against anyone violating the ordinance.

Penalties could escalate to $400 for a second offense within one year and $600 for a third, according to the proposal. The council supported the fines and could approve them next month.

City Attorney Wallace McDonell said the penalties weren’t compared with what other communities have done.

The Wisconsin Legislature in June passed the concealed carry bill, which will take effect Nov. 1. Several communities across the state are implementing their own restrictions, including Elkhorn, where the legislative and regulatory committee Thursday plans to discuss a potential ban.

Universities are considering their own options. The Royal Purple, UW-Whitewater’s student newspaper, reported the university will institute some sort of ban, though officials have yet to release details.

Limits can be placed on buildings, but licensed students would be free to carry firearms throughout campus.

Among the city’s restricted areas are the public library, park buildings, the lakefront center and the armory. State law requires signs to be posted at every entrance to each building where weapons are restricted.

Javonni Butler was the only councilman to oppose the ordinance during its first reading. He was absent during Tuesday’s meeting.

Alderman Lynn Binnie early in the process suggested the board keep an open mind about concealed carry, but he ultimately agreed with certain restrictions.

“When it’s all said and done, I’m not convinced that our citizens would be any safer if they or other law-abiding citizens were carrying a concealed weapons (in) the unthinkable event that there should be an armed perpetrator in one of our municipal buildings,” he said during a meeting earlier this month.

“I really dislike the fact that if this ordinance is passed, all our buildings will have to have signs posted prohibiting weapons, but after researching the subject, I feel that’s what we should do.”

Also during Tuesday’s meeting, Lisa Otterbacher was sworn in as the city’s new police chief, replacing Jim Coan after he left in March to accept a job in Minnesota.

A four-year agreement was unanimously approved by the city council. Otterbacher, who served as interim chief for the last six months, will earn $87,000 annually in her new role.

Other terms include $2,500 for moving expenses. Otterbacher lives just outside city limits, and the police chief is required to live within the city.

She was given one year to move, but an extension could be approved if Otterbacher has difficulties selling her home.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(6)
SwissChick
Sep 29, 2011 at 8:36 a.m.
Suggest removal

fbcoach66: How many years ago was that? First offenders get over $700.00 in fines plus another couple hundred in assessment costs. Just wondering . . .

UDubDub10
Sep 29, 2011 at 6:29 a.m.
Suggest removal

badgerboy - from my attendance at a couple council meetings, I believe they require certain city staff to live within the city limits (maybe management positions?). It's quite archaic, especially considering what little there is in that town. Any substantial shopping or dining requires a 20+ minute drive in any direction, the lakes are filthy and don't promote recreate with no-wake on all of them, and the way the city earn revenue through petty parking tickets on people's on property is disturbing. I'm glad I'm done here next semester.

fbcoach66
Sep 28, 2011 at 10:43 p.m.
Suggest removal

I think the fines for violating the conceal carry ordinance is a little stiff. I've seen drunk drivers in the paper with .25 blood alcohol levels getting $200 to $250 fines, that is a LOT more dangerous than trained person obeying the state law!

ImJustSayin
Sep 28, 2011 at 7:04 p.m.
Suggest removal

It's funny how different levels of government go in opposite directions sometimes.
I'm just sayin'...

badgerboy
Sep 28, 2011 at 6:15 p.m.
Suggest removal

Requiring a police chief to live in the municipality is a bit archaic these days. The article says she lives just outside the city limits. How far, five or ten minutes away? Will that make any substantial difference to a police response? C'mon Whitewater, get with the modern times. Take away the university, you're just another small town in Wisconsin.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT