Rock County considers change to slow/no wake levels on Rock River
IF YOU GO
What: The Rock County Public Safety and Justice Committee will review and hear public comments on a resolution that would set a countywide standard for water levels for slow/no-wake on the Rock River and Lake Koshkonong.
When: 4 p.m. today
Where: Rock County Courthouse, 51 S. Main St., Janesville.
JANESVILLE A Rock County Board committee is considering changes to slow/no-wake standards on the Rock River.
Just how big a change is unclear.
At a meeting today, the Rock County Public Safety and Justice Committee will take up a resolution for an ordinance that would set objective standards for the water levels at which the county would set and enforce slow/no-wake orders on the Rock River.
The ordinance would split the Rock River in Rock County into north and south halves, using the Indianford dam as the dividing line.
But a draft ordinance leaves blank exactly what water level the county would use to establish slow/no-wake standards for either part of the river.
“We’re trying to draft one (slow/no-wake ordinance) that will work for all sides,” Ivan Collins, public safety and justice committee chairman, said in an interview over the weekend.
Collins said “all sides” include:
-- The Rock-Koshkonong Lake District, which has petitioned the county, asking it to set a uniform slow/no-wake standard at flood action stage along parts of the Rock River in Rock County.
-- Rock County residents who have property along the Rock River, some of whom have said they’d oppose boats cruising the river at flood action stage over concerns about possible property damage and shoreline erosion, officials said.
-- Officials from townships in the Rock River basin, which already have slow/no-wake standards set by their own ordinances.
Collins said the committee hopes to draw input today from all three groups. He said the committee could make a recommendation as early as today on suggested water levels in the slow/no-wake ordinance, but it would need final approval by the county board.
Slow/no-wake orders on the river are now based on standards set in town and municipal ordinances and are enforced by the Rock County Sheriff’s Office.
But the Rock-Koshkonong Lake District last year filed a petition with the county requesting a countywide slow/no-wake ordinance with an “objective numerical standard” for water levels.
The lake district wants the county to use flood action stage as that standard, said its chairman, Brian Christianson.
Flood action stage is a foot below true flood stage.
Christianson has said having the standard at action stage would shorten the time slow/no-wake orders stay in effect during spring and early summer, when it typically takes the river longer to recede than rise. He has said that would be a boon to recreational boaters.
Christianson also has said it would give the lake district a buffer for water levels and would allow the lake district to use the Indianford dam to raise water levels on Lake Koshkonong without affecting boat traffic on the river.
The lake district’s plan to raise water levels using the dam is tied up in a suit against the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, which is headed to the state Supreme Court.
At Lake Koshkonong, flood action stage is 9 feet. That’s 1½ feet higher than the town of Fulton’s slow/no-wake recommendation of 7½ feet.
Town of Fulton Chairman Evan Sayre said he plans to attend Monday’s committee meeting.
Sayre said he’s heard from a half-dozen residents who live along the river in Fulton Township who say they don’t want boats cutting wakes while the river’s at flood action stage. Sayre said those residents built piers and seawalls at levels based on a 7½-foot slow/no-wake standard. He said the residents are concerned that if boats are allowed to cruise at higher water levels, it could damage their property and cause shoreline erosion.
“There’s no reason why you’d want to be tearing around in March and April with a $50,000 boat when people’s piers are still under water,” Sayre said. “It (slow/no-wake) needs to be put on and taken off in an orderly manner.”
Sayre said the Fulton Town Board decided earlier this year it wants to keep its slow/no-wake standard at 7½ feet or “some realistic, manageable number.”
“If somebody’s going to be happy with it at 7.62 (feet) or something like that, I’m not going to file a lawsuit over it or anything,” he said.

Sep 20, 2011 at 1:58 p.m.
Suggest removal
@intrigued: so let's see, I should take my boat off my lift where I live, proceed to a landing at SNW. Then load up my boat and try to find a nearer landing to the lake?
Sep 20, 2011 at 1:27 p.m.
Suggest removal
I'm not anti-boater, just for helping the water quality on the Rock. I live on the river in Fort where there is a slow/no wake ordinance in effect all summer through the city of Fort Atkinson. I think of it as a joke since there is no enforcement.
I suppose it's possible that big boats make a bigger wake when they go slower but I can tell you that they sure do make one when they go fast. I'm not worried about my shoreline but across the river from me is basically farmland. Every wave washing upon that shore is washing more fertilizer, herbicides and pesticides into the river. Mmm yum, that makes for great fishing and recreation for everyone, don't you think?
And if it takes too long for boaters to get where they are going at the SNW speed then drive your boat to a closer boat landing and get in there.
Sep 20, 2011 at 12:12 p.m.
Suggest removal
JCK not every year.
Sep 20, 2011 at 11:47 a.m.
Suggest removal
If my memory serves me correctly the Aqua Jays did cancel shows when no wake rules were in effect due to high water levels.
Sep 20, 2011 at 11:45 a.m.
Suggest removal
The antiboaters were out in full force at the hearing last nite. Seems as though they had prior notice of the meeting that was not posted until Monday am in the gazette. Also convenient that the meeting was not called until after all the summer residents on the river from kosh to Indianford were gone for the season. This proposal had been in the works for over a year. Lot of wetlands people that do not have a dog in the fight had been recruited to attend. Very few wetlands from the lake to Newville. Hmmmm! People do not realize that at SNW (2.5mph)it takes over 1hr 15min to get to the lake from just the railroad bridge and that is each way.
Sep 20, 2011 at 11:13 a.m.
Suggest removal
I agree that the Aqua Jays should have to abide by the same rules as the rest of us boaters. Also, being a life-long boater myself I'm sick of people complaining about the "big boats" throwing all this wake when they fly by...just an fyi: the faster these "big boats" go, the less wake they throw. If you would prefer they plow by slowly, I'll let them know and then you can complain about your shoreline being destroyed. Just sayin'
Sep 19, 2011 at 6:22 p.m.
Suggest removal
But---The Aqua Jays are the most important thing to EVER happen to the Rock River!!! They deserve FULL control over any and all of the river!!! They should be able to make as many waves as they want, as to entertain the masses in Riverside Park.
Or not.
Sep 19, 2011 at 4:31 p.m.
Suggest removal
HAHAHA good one BBB. Having my Aunt live on the river all of her life I had the privilege of getting to know that the Rock Aqua Jays thought they ruled the river up to the first park of Riverside. What they failed to realize is that the Rock River is a navigable river and that not even the Rock county sheriff could force anyone from any parts of the river. Yes, the Agua Jays were given due courtesy just a little past the Memorial bridge but after that the river was open in our rights to use.
Sep 19, 2011 at 4:25 p.m.
Suggest removal
Does this mean the Rock AquaJays will have to obey the law.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.