Wis. Assembly begins debate of Walker’s budget

By ASSOCIATED PRESS   Wednesday, June 15, 2011
ADVERTISEMENT
 

Reader pollAudio

Now that the budget repair bill has become law, has your opinion on the matter changed?

  

See the results and comments

Reader pollAudio

Do you agree with the State Supreme Court ruling on whether the legislature followed open meetings law?

  

See the results and comments

PhotoVideo


Josh Reed, a teacher from Williams Bay, Wis., holds an American flag during a rally at the state Capitol in Madison, Wis., Tuesday afternoon, June 14, 2011.

Josh Reed, a teacher from Williams Bay, Wis., holds an American flag during a rally at the state Capitol in Madison, Wis., Tuesday afternoon, June 14, 2011.

— Democrats assailed Republican Gov. Scott Walker’s budget Wednesday in the opening minutes of debate on his plan to balance a projected $3 billion shortfall by making deep cuts to education and other programs.

The $66 billion budget, which does not include any widespread tax increases, will be devastating to the middle class and doesn’t spread the burden in plugging the shortfall, said Democratic Minority Leader Peter Barca. He cited cuts to higher education, public schools, the University of Wisconsin and programs benefiting the poor.

“I can’t believe this is what you think your constituents sent you here to do,” Barca said. “Your values do not size up to the heritage of this great state.”

Rep. Robin Vos, the Republican co-chair of the budget committee, defended the plan as making the cuts necessary to balance the budget while also spurring economic growth through a new manufacturing tax credit and other incentives.

“We said it’s time for government to go on a diet and that’s exactly what happens in this budget,” Vos said. “This budget has so many good things in it. ... This is something all of us can be proud of.”

There are no general sales or income tax increases in the budget, which would also hold property tax increases to about $50 for the average home over two years. At the same time, it would reduce tax breaks for some who qualify for the federal Earned Income Tax Credit and poor homeowners and renters.

The budget cuts public education funding by $800 million over two years and reduces the ability of local school districts to make it up through property tax increases. It also cuts UW funding by $250 million, calls for $500 million cuts in Medicaid and puts an enrollment cap on a popular program designed to keep senior citizens out of nursing homes.

Democrats planned to offer a series of changes that are expected to be rejected by the Republican majority. Once the Assembly passes the budget, expected later Wednesday, it will head to the Senate and debate there that is expected to begin Thursday morning. Both houses must pass an identical version before it goes to Walker. The budget would take effect July 1.

Republicans plan to offer a number of changes to the plan that was worked on for months in the GOP-controlled Joint Finance Committee. Among them, removing a provision that would allow voucher schools in Green Bay as part of an expansion of an existing program.

The Assembly also was expected to allow the University of Wisconsin to continue to receive about $40 million in federal money to pay for making broadband Internet access available in rural areas, reversing a change made by the budget committee.

It was also expected to revisit a proposal that would require local governments use private contractors for certain public works projects and add transit workers to those who are exempt from Walker’s divisive law taking away union bargaining rights from public workers.

Expanding the voucher program has long been a Republican priority. But Jim Bender, a lobbyist for the pro-voucher group School Choice Wisconsin, said allowing vouchers in Green Bay was being taken out as part of a “path to finding resolution” to the budget.

“The conversation regarding school vouchers in Green Bay doesn’t end here,” Bender said.

School vouchers, in which public money is used to pay for students to attend private or religious schools, is currently only allowed in the city of Milwaukee. Walker proposed in his budget allowing Milwaukee students to also attend private and religious schools in Milwaukee County.

The Joint Finance Committee voted first to expand vouchers to Racine and then, in one of its last votes on June 3, extended the program to Green Bay. The expansion to Racine and Milwaukee County will remain, Bender said.

Allowing vouchers in Green Bay caught school officials there by surprise and they blasted the last-minute addition. State Superintendent Tony Evers also criticized the expansion of voucher programs at a time when Walker’s budget proposes cutting public education funding by $800 million and reduces how much money schools can raise through property taxes.

The state budget would also loosen the income requirement to participate in the voucher program. To qualify, a family must currently earn less than 175 percent of the federal poverty level, or $39,630 for a family of four.

A protester in the Assembly gallery interrupted Vos when he made his first speech on the budget. State patrol officers carried the person away as she shouted “Shame!” and read a prepared statement in opposition to the budget.

About 100 people were watching the debate and about 2,500 protesters gathered at the Capitol on Tuesday, the day the Assembly was to have begun the budget debate.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(5)
dtb
Jun 15, 2011 at 11:35 p.m.
Suggest removal

I very much disagree with the health insurance (NOT health care) law AND the way it was written and passed. I'm no fan of Obama or Doyle and of his shenanigans (he was perhaps our most corrupt Gov. ever-jury is still out on the current one).
.
The truth is ALL pols are for sale to the highest bidder - D & R just have different bidders - and no one seems to really be acting in the best interests of the "average" American.
.
We can't really move forward until people realize this and get past all the partisan bickering and name calling and force the people who are supposed to represent us to actually do that. I'm not sure how that is accomplished when everything is driven by Big Money, and most of us have none.
.
We can agree to disagree on walker - I don't believe he is acting in the best interest of our state by trying to dismantle public education while he continues to build billion dollar roads and giving corporate welfare to those who don't need it. 20 years from now the roads will need to be rebuilt again, but the lack of a quality education will stay with the students for a lifetime.
.
You can vote them all out and start over, but that guarantees nothing since the new boss will be the same as the old boss (as the song says). We're between a rock and a hard place.

doc0430
Jun 15, 2011 at 10:19 p.m.
Suggest removal

dtb~Kind of like the Democrats did with the health care bill? I recall when asked what was in the bill Nancy Pelosi said "we have to approve it to find out". What would happen in the real world if business was done in such a way?
Nevermind, I realize after months of debating this subject that some of you are just unable or unwilling to see this for what it actually is, and that is a budget REPAIR bill, the budget is broken and is in need of repairs and that is what our elected Governor Scott Walker is trying to do!
I know that your opinions will never change on this topic and that is the reason why I have no longer been weighing in here with my opinions since they really are unnecessary since the budget will move on just as it should.

soup2k10
Jun 15, 2011 at 7:53 p.m.
Suggest removal

FINALLY!!

dtb
Jun 15, 2011 at 6:30 p.m.
Suggest removal

Thanks to their "extraordinary session", they'll ram this through before anyone has a chance to see what's in it.

dtb
Jun 15, 2011 at 6:28 p.m.
Suggest removal

"it would reduce tax breaks for some"
.
Isn't that the same as a tax increase?

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT