Milton could OK ordinance fines for run-down rental properties
Photo 
Tom Chesmore
MILTON An ordinance under review tonight by the Milton City Council would allow the city to issue landlords ordinance tickets of at least $300 for failing to maintain safe, livable conditions in residential rental properties.
In June, the city’s public safety committee introduced a draft ordinance that would allow city code enforcers to hand out citations for failing to make timely, adequate repairs to residential rental properties.
Rather than going through circuit court, the ordinance would allow the citations to be handled locally, in city court.
City officials say the ordinance would force landlords to maintain amenities spelled out in lease agreements and would give renters a way to handle maintenance problems faster than filing a complaint in circuit court. It also would help landlords to force repairs when tenants damage rental properties.
The ordinance has been under review since June, when the council approved a first read on it. In a city memo, Municipal Judge Kris Koeffler is asking the city council to approve the following fines for noncompliance, which would be tied to the ordinance:
-- $300 plus fees for a first offense.
-- $600 plus fees for a second offense.
-- $1,000 plus fees for a third offense.
Mayor Tom Chesmore, who supports the measure, Monday said the council could waive a third reading and adopt the ordinance as early as tonight, although he expects some local landlords could turn out give the council feedback.
Chesmore pointed out that the ordinance mirrors state statutes on rental property maintenance.
“I’d like to hear what they (landlords) want on this,” Chesmore said. “I’m not asking them to jump through a hoop of fire. This is no different than what’s required of them already at the state level.”
Chesmore said he believes Koeffler’s suggested fines for noncompliance are “sufficient.” Meanwhile, he said local renters have thanked him and some city council members for their work on the ordinance.
“They’ve said they’re so glad the city’s finally trying to do something,” Chesmore said.
Alderwoman Nancy Lader, who owns eight rental properties in Milton, in June voted against approving a first draft of the ordinance.
At the time, Lader said she had no problem with renters getting help with problems at rental properties, but she said she believed the ordinance could put undue pressure on landlords.
Lader asked the city’s legal staff to analyze the ordinance to ensure it went no further than rental property maintenance requirements spelled out in state statutes.
She argued it’s not always possible to do work such as furnace repairs as quickly as renters would like. For instance, sometimes a repairman can’t get to a job right away, she said, even though the landlord makes an order for parts and repairs.
Lader also argued that private homeowners with run-down properties in Milton should have to meet the same property maintenance standards as landlords.

Jul 20, 2011 at 1:24 p.m.
Suggest removal
Do we have this in Janesville? If not we need it, if we do then they need to work harder. There are so many properties that should be torn down for blight in this city. They can start with the nasty Kellogg apartments and work their way around town from there.
Jul 20, 2011 at 8:53 a.m.
Suggest removal
Janesville could use a little help in this area too........
Jul 20, 2011 at 8:24 a.m.
Suggest removal
I agree that Ms. Lader should abstain from voting on this issue. I also agree that the ordinance should cover private homeowners as well.
Jul 20, 2011 at 7:56 a.m.
Suggest removal
As a rental property owner within the city limits, Ms. Lader should have, and really must, abstain from any and all votes that relate to this ordinance.
WW
Jul 19, 2011 at 11:56 p.m.
Suggest removal
Riverrat-
I suppose I should first take into consideration your name. Second I should probably consider that you may be a riverrat before I personally insult your lack of intelligence.
Lastly, I'll point out to you that what Mayor Chesmore has pointed out is again said OVERDUE! This is something that should have been YEARS ago by previous Mayor Nate Bruce. Just because he found poor living conditions while searching for places to rent for his daughter does not mean his decision to come forward with this was directly based off of what he experienced. If you're so deeply concerned that he based his recommendations off of such an experience maybe you should contact him or other city officials and take action of your so called 'beliefs'. Those who argue with the passing of this ordinance are likely the "SLUMLORDS" who would rather not take care of their properties or have it so good they don't care what other people suffer through when landlords choose not to keep their properties that residents pay money for updated and suitable. Just my opinion!
Jul 19, 2011 at 10:22 p.m.
Suggest removal
This is something that has been long over due, and I agree with Nancy lader there are alot of run down properties in Milton in need of repair make sure they get a notice to repair as well.
Jul 19, 2011 at 7:54 p.m.
Suggest removal
Chesmore is at it again--take his daughter looking for cheap apartments. Finds poor conditions according to him--now he pushes an ordinance that will raise rents. But I bet he gets a sweet deal for his daughter.
My kids rented places in milton that were very nice, clean, maintained--but--they paid a fair price.
If you want cheap I would recommend Janesville or Beloit!
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.